Effects of Acoustic Gradient Noise from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Auditory Processing as Reflected by Event-Related Brain Potentials

The processing of sound changes and involuntary attention to them has been widely studied with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Recently, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been applied to determine the neural mechanisms of involuntary attention and the sources of the corresponding ERP components. The gradient-coil switching noise from the MRI scanner, however, is a challenge to any experimental design using auditory stimuli. In the present study, the effects of MRI noise on ERPs associated with preattentive processing of sound changes and involuntary switching of attention to them were investigated. Auditory stimuli consisted of frequently presented "standard" sounds, infrequent, slightly higher "deviant" sounds, and infrequent natural "novel" sounds. The standard and deviant sounds were either sinusoidal tones or musical chords, in separate stimulus sequences. The mismatch negativity (MMN) ERP associated with preattentive sound change detection was elicited by the deviant and novel sounds and was not affected by the prerecorded background MRI noise (in comparison with the condition with no background noise). The succeeding positive P3a ERP responses associated with involuntary attention switching elicited by novel sounds were also not affected by the MRI noise. However, in ERPs to standard tones and chords, the P1, N1, and P2 peak latencies were significantly prolonged by the MRI noise. Moreover, the amplitude of the subsequent "exogenous" N2 to the standard sounds was significantly attenuated by the presence of MRI noise. In conclusion, the present results suggest that in fMRI the background noise does not interfere with the imaging of auditory processing related to involuntary attention.

[1]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Human auditory-cortex mechanisms of preattentive sound discrimination , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R Hari,et al.  Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  F. Chollet,et al.  Differential fMRI Responses in the Left Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus and Left Supramarginal Gyrus to Habituation and Change Detection in Syllables and Tones , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Friederici,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  B B Biswal,et al.  Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attention and brain function in Alzheimer's disease: A review. , 1993 .

[10]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  M Huotilainen,et al.  Harmonic partials facilitate pitch discrimination in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  C. Erwin.  Event-related potentials: basic issues and applications , 1994 .

[14]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  V M Haughton,et al.  Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  S Martinkauppi,et al.  Working memory of auditory localization. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[18]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[19]  P. Gott,et al.  Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  E Borg,et al.  MRI acoustic noise: Sound pressure and frequency analysis , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  V M Haughton,et al.  Functional MR of the primary auditory cortex: an analysis of pure tone activation and tone discrimination. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  R E Brummett,et al.  Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[24]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  D Atkinson,et al.  Determination of gradient magnetic field‐induced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar and three‐dimensional, fast spin echo techniques , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  D. Woods.  The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. , 1990 .

[27]  N. Kiang,et al.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  D. Lim,et al.  Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: A study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[30]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[31]  M. Buonocore,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging depicts the brain in action , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[32]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Localization of brain function using magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  R T Knight,et al.  Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[34]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Cortical Excitability and Connectivity Reflected in fMRI, MEG, EEG, and TMS , 2000 .

[35]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  B. Rosen,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Science.