What Image Properties Regulate Eye Growth?

The growth of the eye, unlike other parts of the body, is not ballistic. It is guided by visual feedback with the eventual aim being optimal focus of the retinal image or emmetropization . It has been shown in animal models that interference with the quality of the retinal image leads to a disruption to the normal growth pattern, resulting in the development of refractive errors and defocused retinal images . While it is clear that retinal images rich in pattern information are needed to control eye growth, it is unclear what particular aspect of image structure is relevant. Retinal images comprise a range of spatial frequencies at different absolute and relative contrasts and in different degrees of spatial alignment. Here we show, by using synthetic images, that it is not the local edge structure produced by relative spatial frequency alignments within an image but rather the spatial frequency composition per se that is used to regulate the growth of the eye. Furthermore, it is the absolute energy at high spatial frequencies regardless of the spectral slope that is most effective. Neither result would be expected from currently accepted ideas of how human observers judge the degree of image "blur" in a scene where both phase alignments and the relative energy distribution across spatial frequency (i.e., spectral slope) are important.

[1]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  C. Wildsoet,et al.  Stimulus requirements for the decoding of myopic and hyperopic defocus under single and competing defocus conditions in the chicken. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Frank Schaeffel,et al.  A simple mechanism for emmetropization without cues from accommodation or colour , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  K. Schmid,et al.  Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  F Schaeffel,et al.  Changes in contrast sensitivity induced by defocus and their possible relations to emmetropization in the chicken. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Malinda E.C. Fitzgerald,et al.  The relationship of choroidal blood flow and accommodation to the control of ocular growth , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  Katrina L Schmid,et al.  Assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the chick using an optokinetic nystagmus paradigm , 1998, Vision Research.

[9]  Katrina L. Schmid,et al.  The effect of manipulations to target contrast on emmetropization in chick , 2006, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Wallman,et al.  Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. , 1987, Current eye research.

[11]  J Turkel,et al.  Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. , 1978, Science.

[12]  W Hodos,et al.  Retinal-image degradation produces ocular enlargement in chicks. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  L N Piotrowski,et al.  A Demonstration of the Visual Importance and Flexibility of Spatial-Frequency Amplitude and Phase , 1982, Perception.

[14]  D. Field,et al.  Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  Frank Schaeffel,et al.  ZENK expression of retinal glucagon amacrine cells in chicks: The effect of defocus presented in vivo, in vitro and under anesthesia , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Ocular compensation for alternating myopic and hyperopic defocus , 2005, Vision Research.

[17]  Frank Schaeffel,et al.  The growing eye: an autofocus system that works on very poor images , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Chapter 6 Retinal control of eye growth and refraction , 1993 .

[19]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  E. Irving,et al.  Inducing Myopia, Hyperopia, and Astigmatism in Chicks , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Howard C. Howland,et al.  Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[24]  T T Norton,et al.  Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[25]  Katrina L Schmid,et al.  Emmetropization in chicks uses optical vergence and relative distance cues to decode defocus , 2001, Vision Research.

[26]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens , 1988, Vision Research.

[27]  R F Hess,et al.  How are spatial filters used in fovea and parafovea? , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Kainic acid-induced eye enlargement in chickens: differential effects on anterior and posterior segments. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.