Silencing of the Escherichia coli bgl promoter: effects of template supercoiling and cell extracts on promoter activity in vitro.

Regulation of the Escherichia coli bgl promoter involves the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) and silencer elements that are located upstream and downstream of the promoter and its CAP binding site. The promoter is kept in a repressed state by the silencer elements and other normally active CAP-dependent or -independent promoters are repressed as well when flanked by these elements. To assess the mechanism of promoter repression, single round in vitro transcription was carried out with plasmids bearing either the wild-type bgl promoter or one of two derivatives that escape repression in vivo by different mechanisms: C234 by improving the CAP binding site of the promoter and delta1 by a deletion within the upstream silencer sequence. Repression of the bgl promoter in vitro was shown to depend on template topology and the presence of cellular factors. With negatively supercoiled templates, all three promoters are transcribed to similar extents by purified E. coli RNA polymerase and no CAP dependence is apparent; with relaxed templates, transcription is CAP dependent, but the levels of transcription of the three promoters are comparable. Addition of crude cell extract to the simple transcription system leads to repression of all three promoter alleles in the absence of CAP. Repression of the mutant alleles but not of the wild-type promoter is completely relieved in the presence of the CAP-cAMP complex. The topology of the DNA template is also important in the differential regulation of these promoters. In the case of C234, repression by cell extract is completely relieved by CAP-cAMP on relaxed or negatively supercoiled templates, while complete derepression of delta1 by CAP-cAMP occurs on negatively supercoiled templates only. Repression by cell extract requires the presence of the histone-like protein H-NS. However, H-NS alone does not appear to be sufficient for specific silencing of the wild-type promoter, since repression of all three promoter alleles caused by purified H-NS protein is completely relieved by the CAP-cAMP complex. These data suggest that template topology, H-NS and other cellular factors are involved in the formation of a specific nucleoprotein structure in the bgl promoter-silencer region; the formation of this nucleoprotein structure keeps an otherwise active promoter in an inactive state.

[1]  A. S. Lynch,et al.  Regulation of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 1996, Springer US.

[2]  M. Mukerji,et al.  Transcriptional activation of the Escherichia coli bgl operon: negative regulation by DNA structural elements near the promoter , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  K. Schnetz,et al.  Silencing of Escherichia coli bgl promoter by flanking sequence elements. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[4]  J. Wang,et al.  SopB protein-mediated silencing of genes linked to the sopC locus of Escherichia coli F plasmid. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  H. Buc,et al.  Modulated expression of promoters containing upstream curved DNA sequences by the Escherichia coli nucleoid protein H‐NS , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[6]  E. Bremer,et al.  Synthesis of the Escherichia coli K‐12 nucleoid‐associated DNA‐binding protein H‐NS is subjected to growth‐phase control and autoregulation , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  C. Higgins,et al.  The chromatin-associated protein H-NS interacts with curved DNA to influence DNA topology and gene expression , 1992, Cell.

[8]  B. Uhlin,et al.  Antirepression function in Escherichia coli for the cAMP-cAMP receptor protein transcriptional activator. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  B. Rak,et al.  IS5: a mobile enhancer of transcription in Escherichia coli. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Higgins,et al.  Protein H1: a role for chromatin structure in the regulation of bacterial gene expression and virulence? , 1990, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  R. Patient,et al.  A simplified method for in vivo footprinting using DMS. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  O. Amster-Choder,et al.  Regulation of activity of a transcriptional anti-terminator in E. coli by phosphorylation in vivo. , 1990, Science.

[13]  B. Rak,et al.  Beta-glucoside permease represses the bgl operon of Escherichia coli by phosphorylation of the antiterminator protein and also interacts with glucose-specific enzyme III, the key element in catabolite control. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Protein phosphorylation regulates transcription of the β-glucoside utilization operon in E. coli , 1989, Cell.

[15]  B. Rak,et al.  Regulation of the bgl operon of Escherichia coli by transcriptional antitermination. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[16]  Ian R. Booth,et al.  A physiological role for DNA supercoiling in the osmotic regulation of gene expression in S. typhimurium and E. coli , 1988, Cell.

[17]  J. Wang,et al.  Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A Wright,et al.  Positive and negative regulation of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli , 1987, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  B. Rak,et al.  Beta-glucoside (bgl) operon of Escherichia coli K-12: nucleotide sequence, genetic organization, and possible evolutionary relationship to regulatory components of two Bacillus subtilis genes , 1987, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  S. LeGrice,et al.  Enhancement of bacterial gene expression by insertion elements or by mutation in a CAP-cAMP binding site. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  H. Fritz,et al.  The gapped duplex DNA approach to oligonucleotide-directed mutation construction. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  D. C. Wood,et al.  Effect of supercoiling on the abortive initiation kinetics of the RNA-I promoter of ColE1 plasmid DNA. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  R. Sternglanz,et al.  Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants have compensatory mutations in DNA gyrase genes , 1982, Cell.

[24]  A. Wright,et al.  Insertion of DNA activates the cryptic bgl operon in E. coli K12 , 1981, Nature.

[25]  G. Wilson,et al.  High-frequency generalised transduction by bacteriophage T4 , 1979, Nature.

[26]  M. Casadaban,et al.  Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  S. Schaefler,et al.  Regulation of the β-Glucoside System in Escherchia coli K-12 , 1974 .

[28]  S. Schaefler.  Inducible System for the Utilization of β-Glucosides in Escherichia coli I. Active Transport and Utilization of β-Glucosides , 1967 .

[29]  C. Higgins.  Protein H-NS (H1a), Chromatin Structure, and Gene Expression , 1992 .

[30]  J. Messing.  [2] New M13 vectors for cloning , 1983 .

[31]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[32]  G. Zubay,et al.  In vitro synthesis of protein in microbial systems. , 1973, Annual review of genetics.