Conjugated equine estrogens and coronary heart disease: the Women's Health Initiative.

BACKGROUND In recent randomized trials, conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) with continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate provided no protection against coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women and may have increased cardiac risk. These trials did not address the role of unopposed estrogen for coronary protection. METHODS A total of 10 739 women aged 50 to 79 years at baseline (mean age, 63.6 years) who had previously undergone hysterectomy were randomized to receive CEE, 0.625 mg/d, or placebo at 40 US clinical centers beginning in 1993. The trial was terminated early after 6.8 years of follow-up (planned duration, 8.5 years). This report includes final, centrally adjudicated results for the primary efficacy outcome (myocardial infarction or coronary death), secondary coronary outcomes, and subgroup analyses. RESULTS During the active intervention period, 201 coronary events were confirmed among women assigned to receive CEE compared with 217 events among women assigned to receive placebo (hazard ratio, 0.95; nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.16). Among women aged 50 to 59 years at baseline, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 0.63 (nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.08). In that age group, coronary revascularization was less frequent among women assigned to receive CEE (hazard ratio, 0.55; nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.86), as were several composite outcomes, which included the primary outcome and coronary revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.66; nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.97). CONCLUSIONS Conjugated equine estrogens provided no overall protection against myocardial infarction or coronary death in generally healthy postmenopausal women during a 7-year period of use. There was a suggestion of lower coronary heart disease risk with CEE among women 50 to 59 years of age at baseline.

[1]  D. Reboussin,et al.  Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Manson,et al.  Risk of Cardiovascular Disease by Hysterectomy Status, With and Without Oophorectomy: The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study , 2005, Circulation.

[3]  Mary Cushman,et al.  Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Chin,et al.  Achieving a New Standard in Primary Care for Low-Income Populations: Case Study 2: Advanced Access Learning , 2004 .

[5]  R. Stafford,et al.  National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence. , 2004, JAMA.

[6]  Charles Kooperberg,et al.  Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  H. Taylor,et al.  The Women's Health Initiative could not have detected cardioprotective effects of starting hormone therapy during the menopausal transition. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  Susan R. Johnson,et al.  The Women's Health Initiative postmenopausal hormone trials: overview and baseline characteristics of participants. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[9]  J. Hsia,et al.  Effects of hormone replacement therapy and antioxidant vitamin supplements on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[10]  T. Clarkson,et al.  MPA and postmenopausal coronary artery atherosclerosis revisited , 2003, Steroids.

[11]  A. Lemay The relevance of the Women's Health Initiative results on combined hormone replacement therapy in clinical practice. , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[12]  Susan R. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Estrogen or Estrogen/ Progestin Regimens on Heart Disease Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women: The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial , 1995 .

[13]  K. Koh,et al.  Should progestins be blamed for the failure of hormone replacement therapy to reduce cardiovascular events in randomized controlled trials? , 2004, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[14]  JoAnn E. Manson,et al.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[15]  D. Schoenfeld The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions , 1981 .

[16]  S. Azen,et al.  Hormone Therapy and the Progression of Coronary-Artery Atherosclerosis in Postmenopausal Women , 2003 .

[17]  C. Kooperberg,et al.  Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[18]  Bruce Landon,et al.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement. , 2004, Health affairs.

[19]  J. Manson,et al.  Understanding the divergent data on postmenopausal hormone therapy. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  John Robbins,et al.  National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Scott Davis,et al.  Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[22]  Garnet L Anderson,et al.  The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[23]  S Hulley,et al.  Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. , 1998, JAMA.

[24]  A. LaCroix,et al.  Predictors of angina pectoris versus myocardial infarction from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Effect of postmenopausal hormones on inflammation-sensitive proteins: the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Study. , 1999, Circulation.

[26]  J. Hsia,et al.  Usefulness of prior hysterectomy as an independent predictor of Framingham risk score (The Women's Health Initiative). , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.