Does Geographical Proximity Enhance Knowledge Exchange? The Case of the Aerospace Industrial Cluster of Centre Italy

According to the dominant literature, spatial proximity matters for successful inter-firm collaboration for innovation and more generally for knowledge transfer. This assumption is based on the argument that the tacit character of complex knowledge makes repetitive face-to-face interactions and shared cognition necessary to capture new ideas and to exchange knowledge. In contrast with this assumption, another stream of literature supports the idea that innovating requires integrating 'global best' scientific discoveries and knowledge, despite the geographical position of potential partners. Based on field research in the aerospace cluster of Rome, this study offers empirical evidence for the assumption that geographical proximity matters for inter-firm innovation-related knowledge exchange. Although external innovation collaborations are more diffused than local ones, we found that local relationships are more effective as knowledge vehicles, because more knowledge is exchanged through local relationships than through external ties. Moreover, it is showed that the propensity to transfer more knowledge with co-located partners is accentuated for the most critical type of knowledge. Finally, it is demonstrated that the propensity to access external knowledge is unevenly distributed among cluster firms.

[1]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  The Biomedical Valley: structural, relational and cognitive aspects , 2003 .

[2]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[3]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Localized learning revisited , 2006 .

[4]  David J. Teece,et al.  Joint Ventures and Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1988 .

[5]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[6]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[7]  L. Biggiero,et al.  Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks , 2008 .

[8]  Frank Wilkinson,et al.  High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe , 2000 .

[9]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy , 2007 .

[10]  Rui Baptista,et al.  A comparison of clustering dynamics in the US and UK computer industries , 1999 .

[11]  Sören Eriksson,et al.  Technology spill-over from the aircraft industry: the case of Volvo Aero , 2000 .

[12]  Fiorenza Belussi,et al.  The generation of contextual knowledge through communication processes. The case of the packaging machinery industry in the Bologna district , 2003 .

[13]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[14]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster , 2001 .

[16]  D. Audretsch.  Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity , 1998 .

[17]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[18]  Rui Baptista,et al.  Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters , 2000 .

[19]  A. Amin,et al.  Learning and Adaptation in Decentralised Business Networks , 1999 .

[20]  G. D. Ottati.  Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district , 1994 .

[21]  Frank Wilkinson,et al.  Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe , 1999 .

[22]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage , 2004 .

[23]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  Industrial and knowledge relocation strategies under the challenges of globalization and digitalization: the move of small and medium enterprises among territorial systems , 2006 .

[24]  Fiorenza Belussi,et al.  Evolution and relocation in fashion-led Italian districts: evidence from two case-studies , 2006 .

[25]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[26]  Sören Eriksson.  Cluster creation and innovation within an emerging Taiwanese high-tech sector , 2006 .

[27]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Cultural Clusters, Global–Local Linkages and Spillovers: Theoretical and Empirical Insights from an Exploratory Study of Toronto's Film Cluster , 2007 .

[28]  Christian Longhi.  From exogenous to endogenous local developement: the cases of Toulouse and Sophia-Antipolis technopoles , 2002 .

[29]  Gerhard Schewe,et al.  Successful innovation management: An integrative perspective , 1994 .

[30]  A. Malmberg,et al.  (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? , 2005 .

[31]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation , 2005 .

[32]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[33]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[34]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[35]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[36]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[37]  Günter Küppers,et al.  Complexity, Self-Organisation and Innovation Networks: A New Theoretical Approach , 2002 .

[38]  S. Iammarino,et al.  The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers , 2006 .

[39]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Spatial Clustering, Local Accumulation of Knowledge and Firm Competitiveness , 1996 .

[40]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Roberta Capello,et al.  Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[42]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Towards a Knowledge‐based Theory of the Geographical Cluster , 2001 .

[43]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[44]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[45]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[46]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  The Location of Multinationals in Industrial Districts: Knowledge Transfer in Biomedicals , 2002 .

[47]  Louis A. Lefebvre,et al.  Global strategic benchmarking, critical capabilities and performance of aerospace subcontractors , 1998 .

[48]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[49]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[50]  Margherita Turvani,et al.  Cognitive economies and the "nature of the district" , 2003 .

[51]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[52]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[53]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[54]  E. Giuliani.  The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry , 2007 .

[55]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[56]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[57]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[58]  Ivana Paniccia,et al.  Industrial Districts: Evolution and Competitiveness in Italian Firms , 2002 .

[59]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[60]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Systems selling in the aircraft industry , 1993 .

[61]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[62]  Christian Longhi,et al.  A French revolution: technology management in the aerospace industry. The case of Toulouse , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[63]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[64]  Majlinda Zhegu,et al.  Aerospace Clusters: Local or Global Knowledge Spillovers? , 2005 .

[65]  P. McCann,et al.  Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development , 2005 .

[66]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[67]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis , 2006 .

[68]  A. Amin,et al.  Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities , 2004 .

[69]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  Social Identity and Identification Processes: Enriching Theoretical Tools to Study Industrial Districts , 2003 .

[70]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[71]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Strategic technology partnering during the 1980s: Trends, networks and corporate patterns in non-core technologies , 1995 .