Open Education is a movement that was born with the purpose of bringing knowledge to disadvantaged sectors and opening the doors to better education opportunities for all. Open Educational Resources (OER) such as Open CourseWare (OCW) has become support resources in the educational environment. For this reason, the quality of the repositories is highlighted by the quality of their metadata. The metadata is one characteristic of the repositories, that facilitates the search and discovery tasks of educational resources, in this way ensures their reuse. Consequently, to assure universal access to quality knowledge there are some metrics of metadata quality to evaluate OCW repository metadata: completeness, consistency, coherence, accuracy, provenance, and accessibility. In this study, accuracy and provenance are prioritized as quality metrics for metadata quality evaluation because they support potential users in the search and selection of OCW resources. This paper uses a set of data from the repository of semantic search engine Serendipity in order to evaluate the selected quality metadata metrics, applying cosine distance technique and calculation of completeness of provenance metadata because it is an important aspect of validating quality criteria for ICT tools. When the corresponding values of the study metrics are obtained, the analysis of the obtained results is performed. Two important findings are identified. First, the cosine technique is an important tool to find the semantic distance between the resource and its metadata. Second, the PAV ontology provides provenance properties of an OCW that helps in obtaining the provenance quality of a resource. This paper is limited to the dataset available in Serendipity semantic search engine, however, it is considered that the interpretation of the findings does not vary if we use a specific repository.
[1]
Néstor Darío Duque Méndez,et al.
Web service to support recovery of learning objects in repositories and federations
,
2016
.
[2]
Audrey Romero Pelaez,et al.
Quality model proposal for educational material production in OCW sites
,
2011,
2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
[3]
Hinrich Schütze,et al.
Introduction to information retrieval
,
2008
.
[4]
Anne M Arendt.
Using Open Educational Resources in the Basic Composition Classroom
,
2009
.
[5]
Javiera Atenas,et al.
Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources: a literature review
,
2014
.
[6]
Edmundo Tovar Caro,et al.
Guidelines to producing structured interoperable data from Open Access Repositories
,
2016,
2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
[7]
Stian Soiland-Reyes,et al.
PAV ontology: provenance, authoring and versioning
,
2013,
J. Biomed. Semant..
[8]
Nathan R. Yergler.
Search and Discovery: OER's Open Loop
,
2010
.
[9]
Erik Duval,et al.
Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories
,
2009,
International Journal on Digital Libraries.
[10]
Fernando de la Prieta,et al.
A model for multi-label classification and ranking of learning objects
,
2012,
Expert Syst. Appl..
[11]
Audrey Romero Pelaez,et al.
Metadata Quality Assessment Metrics into OCW Repositories
,
2017,
ICETC.