Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mental Models Approach for Improving Occupational Chemical Risk Protection

Chemical risk protection in the workplace relies partly on informing workers about possible risks using material safety data sheets (MSDS). This article reports on phase 2 of a project (phase 1 reported in Cox et al.), which employed a mental models approach to improve on data sheets as communicative interventions for perchloroethylene in dry cleaning and rosin-based solder flux in the electronics industry within small businesses in the United Kingdom (small enterprises (SEs) < 25 employees in the workplace). It focuses on the efficacy of a multimethod evaluation strategy to assess (1) the capacity of a mental models approach to yield contextually relevant data for intervention design and (2) the effectiveness of the strategy itself in validating the mental models data. The evaluation was conducted using postal questionnaires and semi-structured verbal protocols to provide responses to the alternative intervention content and to prioritize risk messages. User discussion groups were then employed, particularly as a means of establishing whether contextual information could be obtained that would differ qualitatively from the kind elicited through individual (semi) structured methods. We conclude that the mental models approach as part of an iterative process including systematic multimethod evaluation is successful in supporting the design of relevant communications to the users of chemicals. The overall viability of communicative interventions in the context of health and safety in small businesses remains in question. Future research might aim to develop a more holistic approach to interventions in complex occupational contexts.

[1]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Thinking aloud: Telling a story about a story , 1996 .

[2]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[3]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Evidence that perceived behavioural control is a multidimensional construct: perceived control and perceived difficulty. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Evaluating risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part II. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Ann Bostrom,et al.  Communicating Risk: Wireless and Hardwired , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Karen A. Schriver Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Methods. Technical Report No. 41. , 1989 .

[7]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models , 1994 .

[8]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Designing risk communications , 1994 .

[9]  M. Crang,et al.  Software for Qualitative Research: 1. Prospectus and Overview , 1997 .

[10]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[11]  Donna Riley,et al.  The Use of Mental Models in Chemical Risk Protection: Developing a Generic Workplace Methodology , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Simon Gerrard,et al.  Evaluating Contact Techniques: Assessing the Impact of a Regulator’s Intervention on the Health and Safety Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses , 1998 .

[13]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Characterizing Mental Models of Hazardous Processes: A Methodology and an Application to Radon , 1992 .

[14]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[15]  H. Jungermann,et al.  Mental models in risk assessment: informing people about drugs. , 1988, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  A. Bandura,et al.  The anatomy of stages of change. , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.