Matching in community-based organizations

Using a rich dataset from West Africa, we examine the household characteristics associated with membership in community-based organizations (CBOs). We find that on average it is the more fortunate members of rural society who belong in CBOs. In Senegal, the dominant criterion is land ownership. In Burkina Faso it is age and family ties with village authorities. Ethnicity plays a role as well: CBO membership is less likely for ethnic groups that traditionally emphasize livestock raising. Next we look for evidence of assortative matching along multiple dimensions, using an original methodology based on dyadic regressions. We find robust evidence of positive assorting by physical and ethnic proximity as well as by wealth and household size. Along certain dimensions, donor-sponsored CBOs are less elitist and more inclusive. But the reverse is true for other dimensions, particularly in Burkina Faso.

[1]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Drought and Saving in West Africa: Are Livestock a Buffer Stock? , 1996 .

[2]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Non-parametric standard errors and tests for network statistics , 1999 .

[3]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  The formation of risk sharing networks , 2007 .

[4]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  What Makes You Click: An Empirical Analysis of Online Dating ⁄ , 2005 .

[5]  Stephen Coate,et al.  Centralized Versus Decentralized Provision of Local Public Goods: a Political Economy Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  G. Becker A Treatise on the Family , 1982 .

[7]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Multicollinearity Robust QAP for Multiple-Regression , 2003 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[9]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Group Formation in Risk-Sharing Arrangements , 2003 .

[10]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Decentralisation and Accountability in Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries , 2006 .

[11]  Christopher Udry,et al.  Consumption Smoothing? Livestock, Insurance and Drought in Rural Burkina Faso , 2004 .

[12]  V. Rao,et al.  THE POLITICS OF PUBLIC GOOD PROVISION: EVIDENCE FROM INDIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS , 2004 .

[13]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries , 2005 .

[14]  M. Belot,et al.  Can Anyone Be 'the' One? Evidence on Mate Selection from Speed Dating , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  T. Demuynck,et al.  Network Formation with Heterogeneous Agents and Absolute Friction , 2013 .

[16]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment , 2006 .

[17]  Jean-Philippe Platteau,et al.  The Risk of Resource Misappropriation in Community-Driven Development , 2003 .

[18]  V. Rao,et al.  Community Based (and Driven) Development: A Critical Review , 2004 .

[19]  A. Barr,et al.  The formation of community based organizations in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of a quasi-experiment , 2010 .

[20]  Bruce I. Sacerdote Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates , 2001 .

[21]  Patrick Legros,et al.  Beauty is a Beast, Frog is a Prince: Assortative Matching with Nontransferabilities , 2006 .

[22]  Timothy G. Conley GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence , 1999 .

[23]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Pro-poor targeting and accountability of local governments in West Bengal , 2006 .

[24]  V. Rao,et al.  Community-Based and -Driven Development , 2012 .