Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis

This study aims to examine the literature related to the building life cycle assessment (LCA) that are published from 2000 to 2014 by means of bibliometric methods based on databases of the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index. Of 2025 retrieved publications, 95% were journal articles. The patterns of these articles were investigated such as subject categories, journals, countries, institutions, hot topics and the most highly cited articles. The results showed a rapid growth of building LCA related publications with the USA being the leading country in terms of contributing to the largest number of articles and possessing the greatest influence. Norwegian University Science and Technology is the leading university in terms of building LCA research, which is followed by University of California at Berkeley. All the top 15 institutions possess a favorable cooperative relationship with other institutions. Most journal articles were associated with energy (521 articles), followed by material (388), sustainability (304), carbon (299) and technology with 180. According to the comprehensive analysis of the keywords, it can be concluded that subtopics such as energy, materials, environmental impacts and sustainable development will be prominent directions of future building LCA research, while life cycle costing and life cycle inventory will continue to be the common research methods. These findings help to identify hotspots in the building LCA research. Similarly, this study provides useful inputs for the decision making on the subtopic selection and publication strategy in the building LCA research.

[1]  Peter Haddawy,et al.  A bibliometric study of the world’s research activity in sustainable development and its sub-areas using scientific literature , 2014, Scientometrics.

[2]  Lu Aye,et al.  Environmentally sustainable development: a life-cycle costing approach for a commercial office building in Melbourne, Australia , 2000 .

[3]  Gerd Wegener,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Floor Coverings - A Representative Study for the German Flooring Industry (11 pp) , 2006 .

[4]  Jun Guan,et al.  Quantification of building embodied energy in China using an input–output-based hybrid LCA model , 2016 .

[5]  Michela Robba,et al.  Optimal Planning of Sustainable Buildings: Integration of Life Cycle Assessment and Optimization in a Decision Support System (DSS) , 2016 .

[6]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Establishing environmental benchmarks to determine the environmental performance of elementary school buildings using LCA , 2016 .

[7]  J. Cagiao,et al.  Calculation of the corporate carbon footprint of the cement industry by the application of MC3 methodology , 2011 .

[8]  Carlo Ingrao,et al.  A comparative Life Cycle Assessment of external wall-compositions for cleaner construction solutions in buildings , 2016 .

[9]  Cheonghoon Baek,et al.  Life cycle CO2 evaluation on reinforced concrete structures with high-strength concrete , 2011 .

[10]  T. Muneer,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland , 2007 .

[11]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[12]  Na Li,et al.  A bibliographic analysis of recent solar energy literatures: The expansion and evolution of a research field , 2014 .

[13]  Marilyn A Brown,et al.  Expanding and shifting trends in carbon market research: a quantitative bibliometric study , 2015 .

[14]  J. Hirsch.  Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Barbara J. Lence,et al.  Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies for building projects , 2005 .

[16]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[17]  Umberto Arena,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building. , 2017, Waste management.

[18]  Yusuf Çay,et al.  Determination of optimum insulation thickness, energy savings, and environmental impact for different climatic regions of Turkey , 2013 .

[19]  M. Ilic,et al.  Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone , 2017 .

[20]  G. Treloar,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study , 2000 .

[21]  Yongjun Sun,et al.  Optimal scheduling of buildings with energy generation and thermal energy storage under dynamic electricity pricing using mixed-integer nonlinear programming , 2015 .

[22]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electrical and thermal energy systems for commercial buildings , 2007 .

[23]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  The importance of use and end-of-life phases to the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of concrete : a review , 2014 .

[24]  Matjaz Prek,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment of heating and air conditioning systems, a simplified case study , 2004 .

[25]  Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi,et al.  Optimum insulation thickness determination of a building wall using exergetic life cycle assessment , 2016 .

[26]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[27]  Federica Cucchiella,et al.  Estimation of the energetic and environmental impacts of a roof-mounted building-integrated photovoltaic systems , 2012 .

[28]  Flora Bougiatioti,et al.  The architectural integration of active solar systems. Building applications in the Eastern Mediterranean region , 2015 .

[29]  F. Benjamin Zhan,et al.  Twenty years of global groundwater research: A Science Citation Index Expanded-based bibliometric survey (1993–2012) , 2014 .

[30]  E. Holleris Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings , 2001 .

[31]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Sustainable development of the wind power industry in a complex environment: a flexibility study , 2014 .

[32]  Antonio Gagliano,et al.  Environmental impacts and thermal insulation performance of innovative composite solutions for building applications , 2014 .

[33]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Life cycle cost assessment of building integrated photovoltaic thermal (BIPVT) systems , 2010 .

[34]  A. Horvath.  CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[35]  Hannes Harter,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings and city quarters comparing demolition and reconstruction with refurbishment , 2017 .

[36]  S. Tae,et al.  Life cycle CO2 assessment of concrete by compressive strength on construction site in Korea , 2012 .

[37]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of a commercial office building in Thailand , 2008 .

[38]  Jayanta Deb Mondol,et al.  Modelling and simulation of Building-Integrated solar thermal systems: Behaviour of the coupled building/system configuration , 2015 .

[39]  Francesca Stazi,et al.  Life cycle assessment approach for the optimization of sustainable building envelopes: An application on solar wall systems , 2012 .

[40]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings , 2014 .

[41]  A. Sev.  How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework , 2009 .

[42]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[43]  Robert Le Roy,et al.  Reducing environmental impact by increasing the strength of concrete: quantification of the improvement to concrete bridges , 2012 .

[44]  Oliver Kornadt,et al.  Development of concepts for cost-optimal nearly zero-energy buildings for the industrial steel building sector , 2016 .

[45]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review , 2017 .

[46]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .

[47]  Seppo Junnila.  Life cycle assessment of environmentally significant aspects of an office building , 2004 .

[48]  Stephen Pullen,et al.  Sustainability policy of construction contractors: A review , 2012 .

[49]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory of Particleboard: A Case Study in the Wood Sector (8 pp) , 2006 .

[50]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy) , 2010 .

[51]  E. Sanyé-Mengual,et al.  Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[52]  Adem Atmaca,et al.  Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in south east of Turkey: part 1—review and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[53]  Ben Amor,et al.  Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review , 2017 .

[54]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Design optimization and optimal control of grid-connected and standalone nearly/net zero energy buildings , 2015 .

[55]  Jun Li,et al.  Towards a low-carbon future in China's building sector—A review of energy and climate models forecast , 2008 .

[56]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  Trends in research on global climate change: A Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis , 2011 .

[57]  DongHun Yeo,et al.  Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization , 2011 .