Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors?

A recent phylogenomic study reported that the animal phylogeny was unresolved despite the use of 50 genes. This lack of resolution was interpreted as "a positive signature of closely spaced cladogenetic events." Here, we propose that this lack of resolution is rather due to the mutual cancellation of the phylogenetic signal (historical) and the nonphylogenetic signal (due to systematic errors) that results from inadequate taxon sampling and/or model of sequence evolution. Starting with a data set of comparable size, we use 3 different strategies to reduce the nonphylogenetic signal: 1) increasing the number of species; 2) replacing a fast-evolving species by a slowly evolving one; and 3) using a better model of sequence evolution. In all cases, the phylogenetic resolution is markedly improved, in agreement with our hypothesis that the originally reported lack of resolution was artifactual.

[1]  G. Olsen.  Earliest phylogenetic branchings: comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. , 1987, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[2]  Michael D. Hendy,et al.  A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees , 1989 .

[3]  M. Novacek,et al.  Extinction and phylogeny , 1992 .

[4]  H Philippe,et al.  Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. , 1993, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[5]  Z. Yang,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  M. Gouy,et al.  Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Phylogeny of whales: dependence of the inference on species sampling. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[8]  D. Hillis.  Inferring complex phytogenies , 1996, Nature.

[9]  D. Hillis.  Inferring complex phylogenies. , 1996, Nature.

[10]  R. Raff,et al.  Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals , 1997, Nature.

[11]  M. Steel,et al.  Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. , 1998, Mathematical biosciences.

[12]  A. Graybeal,et al.  Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? , 1998, Systematic biology.

[13]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  S. Whelan,et al.  A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  P. Lio’,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  Heresa,et al.  Perils of Paralogy : Using HSP 70 Genes for Inferring Organismal Phylogenies , 2002 .

[17]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Perils of paralogy: using HSP70 genes for inferring organismal phylogenies. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[18]  David T. Jones,et al.  Protein evolution with dependence among codons due to tertiary structure. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[20]  S. Ho,et al.  Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[21]  D. Penny.  Inferring Phylogenies.—Joseph Felsenstein. 2003. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. , 2004 .

[22]  H. Philippe,et al.  A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  K. Strimmer,et al.  TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[24]  H. Philippe,et al.  Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  Frédéric Delsuc,et al.  Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[26]  S. Carroll,et al.  Animal Evolution and the Molecular Signature of Radiations Compressed in Time , 2005, Science.

[27]  S. Carroll,et al.  More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  G. Gilbert,et al.  THE NEW VIEW OF ANIMAL PHYLOGENY , 2005 .

[29]  F. Delsuc,et al.  Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  Olivier Gascuel,et al.  Improving the efficiency of SPR moves in phylogenetic tree search methods based on maximum likelihood , 2005, Bioinform..

[31]  G. Serio,et al.  A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[32]  David Q. Matus,et al.  Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes , 2006, Current Biology.

[33]  H. Philippe,et al.  Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  J. Weissenbach,et al.  Chaetognath phylogenomics: a protostome with deuterostome-like development , 2006, Current Biology.

[35]  Nicolas Lartillot,et al.  A Bayesian compound stochastic process for modeling nonstationary and nonhomogeneous sequence evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  D. Hillis,et al.  Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[37]  F. Delsuc,et al.  Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates , 2006, Nature.

[38]  H. Philippe,et al.  Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.