Quantum mechanics-based signal and image denoising

Decomposition of digital signals and images into other basis or dictionaries than time or space domains is a very common approach in signal and image processing and analysis. Such a decomposition is commonly obtained using fixed transforms (e.g., Fourier or wavelet) or dictionaries learned from example databases or from the signal or image itself. In this work, we investigate in detail a new approach of constructing such a signal or image-dependent bases inspired by quantum mechanics tools, i.e., by considering the signal or image as a potential in the discretized Schroedinger equation. To illustrate the potential of the proposed decomposition, denoising results are reported in the case of Gaussian, Poisson and speckle noise and compared to state of the art algorithms based on wavelet shrinkage, total variation regularization or patch-wise sparse coding in learned dictionaries.

[1]  Moncef Gabbouj,et al.  Quantum mechanics in computer vision: Automatic object extraction , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Total variation based image restoration with free local constraints , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Gabriel Peyré,et al.  The Numerical Tours of Signal Processing , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[4]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing a Closed-form Approximation of the Exact Unbiased Inverse of the Anscombe Variance-stabilizing Transformation , 2022 .

[5]  Abdullah M. Iliyasu Towards Realising Secure and Efficient Image and Video Processing Applications on Quantum Computers , 2013, Entropy.

[6]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Eric Achten,et al.  Image denoising using the squared eigenfunctions of the Schrodinger operator , 2015 .

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Yonina C. Eldar Quantum signal processing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[10]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[11]  Kai Lu,et al.  NEQR: a novel enhanced quantum representation of digital images , 2013, Quantum Information Processing.

[12]  Adrian Basarab,et al.  Adaptive transform via quantum signal processing: application to signal and image denoising , 2018, 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[13]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Wavelet Shrinkage: Asymptopia? , 1995 .

[14]  Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati,et al.  Semi-classical signal analysis , 2010, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[15]  Eric Achten,et al.  Spectral data de‐noising using semi‐classical signal analysis: application to localized MRS , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Adrian Basarab,et al.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography contrast validation of an artificial periodontal phantom for use in endodontics , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[18]  P. Anderson Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices , 1958 .

[19]  T. Laleg‐Kirati,et al.  Image representation and denoising using squared eigenfunctions of Schrodinger operator , 2014, 1409.3720.

[20]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Restoration of Poissonian Images Using Alternating Direction Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.