Geometric effects on phase split at a large diameter T-junction

The separation of gas-liquid flows is a necessary part of many industrial processes. Thus, it has received much attention over the years with the ultimate aim of reducing equipment costs whilst maintaining or improving efficiency. Traditionally, the Petroleum Industry has relied heavily on conventional vessel separators which are bulky, expensive and have a high inventory. Research has indicated that a cheap alternative may be a simple pipe junction. It has been shown that gas-liquid flows can be divided at pipe junctions in such a manner that there is a partial separation of the phases. The result is two streams - one richer in gas than the initial feed and the other richer in liquid. If the phases can be separated, albeit partially, at a simple pipe junction then the need for a large separator is diminished. Within this thesis the use of a simple T-junction is considered as a continuous, compact, economical partial phase separator with a minimal inventory for use within the oil industry. The main objective was to gain a better understanding of how a gas-liquid flow is divided at a large diameter T-junction and how the flow split is affected by T-junction geometry. Firstly, the orientation of the side arm from the horizontal was considered with both a regular (inlet arm diameter == branch arm diameter = 0.127m) T-junction and a reduced (branch arm to inlet diameter ratio = 0.6) T-junction. The side arm was placed horizontally (0'), vertically upwards (+90') and vertically downwards (-90') and the phase split of air water annular and stratified flows were investigated. To improve the phase separation characteristics of the regular T-junction, inserts protruding from the side arm into the main pipe were considered and for the junction with a vertically downwards side arm a U-bend was used to reduce the fraction of gas pulled through. The experimental investigation was expanded to incorporate the effect of placing two regular T-junctions in series. With the branch arm of the first placed vertically upwards (+90'). and the second vertically downwards (-90') a pure gas stream and a liquid rich stream were created from the multi-phase inlet. Reducing the sidearm diameter of the second junction lowered the fraction of gas drawn off in the liquid rich stream. The physical separation distance the T-junctions was found to have little effect on phase split. The interaction of the two junctions are interdependent and the phase split results from the two junction system was found to be more complex than simply considering the results of two individual T-junctions. Being able to predict the phase split at a junction is vital if they are to be considered seriously within industrial settings. The case of a regular T-junction with a vertically downwards (-90') side arm has received little specific attention. From the linear nature of the phase split results it was determined that if two key points could be accurately predicted then the phase split results can be determined. The "onset of gas take off', the fraction of liquid diverted down the branch arm when the first fraction of gas is pulled through, was successfully related to the bubble rise velocity of the gas entrained in the liquid column trapped in the branch arm. The "critical gas take off”, the fraction of gas diverted when all the liquid is drawn down the branch arm, was determined by relating the fluid flow to the motion of a failing particle.

[1]  J.M.H. Fortuin,et al.  A model for predicting liquid route preference during gas—liquid flow through horizontal branched pipelines , 1991 .

[2]  R. Issa,et al.  NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF PHASE SEPARATION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW THROUGH T-JUNCTIONS , 1994 .

[3]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  A unified model for stratified-wavy two-phase flow splitting at a reduced T-junction with an inclined branch arm , 1997 .

[4]  J. Henry,et al.  DIVIDING ANNULAR FLOW IN A HORIZONTAL TEE , 1981 .

[5]  G. A. Gregory,et al.  An analysis of horizontal stratified two phase flow in pipes , 1973 .

[6]  Barry J. Azzopardi,et al.  Plant Application of a T-Junction as a Partial Phase Separator , 2002 .

[7]  K. Aziz,et al.  A flow pattern map for gas—liquid flow in horizontal pipes , 1974 .

[8]  A. Dukler,et al.  A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas‐liquid flow , 1976 .

[9]  Barry J. Azzopardi,et al.  PHASE SEPARATION AT T JUNCTIONS , 1994 .

[10]  John S. McNown,et al.  Mechanics of Manifold Flow , 1954 .

[11]  Gunol Kojasoy,et al.  Local studies in horizontal gas–liquid slug flow , 1998 .

[12]  Nusrat Habib The prediction of flow patterns, liquid holdup and pressure losses occurring during continuous two-phase flow in horizontal pipelines , 1977 .

[13]  Barry J. Azzopardi,et al.  TWO-PHASE FLOW SPLIT AT T JUNCTIONS: EFFECT OF SIDE ARM ORIENTATION AND DOWNSTREAM GEOMETRY , 1992 .

[14]  B. J. Azzopardi,et al.  The effect of flow patterns on two-phase flow in a T junction , 1982 .

[15]  D. Barnea Stability analysis of annular flow structure, using a discrete form of the “two-fluid model” , 1991 .

[16]  Richard T. Lahey,et al.  Phase separation in dividing two-phase flows , 1988 .

[17]  Richard T. Lahey Current understanding of phase separation mechanisms in branching conduits , 1986 .

[18]  Giuseppe Conte An experimental study for the characterisation of gas/liquid flow splitting at T-junctions , 2000 .

[19]  G. Evans,et al.  Hydrodynamics of a Plunging Liquid Jet Bubble-Column , 1996 .

[20]  K. C. Hong Two-Phase Flow Splitting at a Pipe Tee , 1978 .

[21]  C. Smoglie,et al.  Two phase flow through small breaks in a horizontal pipe with stratified flow , 1987 .

[22]  Gian Piero Celata,et al.  Terminal velocity of single bubbles in surface tension force dominant regime , 2002 .

[23]  M. Shoukri,et al.  Effect of Branch Orientation on Annular Two-Phase Flow in T-Junctions , 1996 .

[24]  J. Reimann,et al.  Flow through a Small Break at the Bottom of a Large Pipe with Stratified Flow , 1984 .

[25]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Two-phase flow splitting in a horizontal reduced pipe tee , 1989 .

[26]  B. Azzopardi Measurements and observations of the split of annular flow at a vertical T-junction , 1988 .

[27]  T. Søntvedt,et al.  Velocity distribution in horizontal slug flow , 1984 .

[28]  Richard T. Lahey,et al.  The analysis of phase separation and phase distribution phenomena using two-fluid models , 1990 .

[29]  M. Shoukri,et al.  On the development of a model for predicting phase separation phenomena in dividing two-phase flow , 1990 .

[30]  Richard T. Lahey,et al.  The analysis of phase separation phenomena in branching conduits , 1983 .

[31]  B. J. Azzopardi The effect of the side arm diameter on the two-phase flow split at a «T» junction , 1984 .

[32]  Marcel Ottens,et al.  Effect of small branch inclination on gas–liquid flow separation in T junctions , 1999 .

[33]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Gas-liquid flow in inclined tubes: Flow pattern transitions for upward flow , 1985 .

[34]  J. R. Fryar Options are available for pipeline and compressor-station drip design , 1980 .