Investigating the image features landscape for the classification of breast microcalcifications

Computer aided diagnosis systems using machine learning techniques have been developed in order to assist radiologists' diagnosis and overcome inherent limitations of conventional mammography. Such systems base their diagnosis on image features extracted from mammograms, which are mainly related to the shape, the morphology, the texture and the position of the suspicious abnormality. Since the discrimination of malignant and benign lesions is a classification problem, a feature selection preprocessing step is needed in order to minimize the dimensionality of the features set by keeping the most significant between them. In this paper, we compare four feature selection methods all based on different approaches on ranking and selection and perform classification of data. Experiments were performed on cases containing clusters of microcalcifications, extracted from a large public mammography database. Our findings indicate that there are subsets of very small number of features that can provide a proper baseline classification.

[1]  M. Kallergi Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  M. Elter,et al.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[4]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  P. A. Ligomenides,et al.  A System for Computer Aided Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer based on Microcalcifications Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  THE DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY , 2007 .

[10]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments , 2004, FEBS letters.

[11]  Pedro Larrañaga,et al.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics , 2007, Bioinform..

[12]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[13]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[15]  J. C. Fu,et al.  Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[16]  Sergio Plata,et al.  A note on Fisher's correlation coefficient , 2006, Appl. Math. Lett..

[17]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  M. Giger,et al.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. , 2008, Medical physics.

[19]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  M Lanyi Microcalcifications in the breast--a blessing or a curse? A critical review. , 1985, Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine.

[21]  L. Costaridou,et al.  Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.