Neurophysiological correlates of word recognition in dyslexia

Summary.The neurobiological basis of learning word spellings and recognition of recently learned words was assessed in a learning experiment in 9 dyslexics and 9 controls male adolescents. In a recognition paradigm previously learned pseudowords and graphic symbols were presented 50 times each interspersed pseudo-randomly between 3 unlearned items which were repeated 50 times and 150 filler pseudowords. The electrophysiological correlate of recognition of learned pseudowords and graphic symbols was a positivity around 600 ms. For pseudowords the amplitude of this ERP component was significantly attenuated in the dyslexic group, no differences between the groups were found for recognition of graphic material. These data suggest that dyslexic children are able to learn the spelling of simple words, however, the neurophysiological correlate of recognition of these learned words is significantly attenuated. This result strengthens the view that dyslexic children are not generally impaired in recognition memory but specific for linguistic material like words.

[1]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  S. Graham,et al.  The Spelling for Writing List , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[4]  S. Graham.  The Directed Spelling Thinking Activity: Application with High-Frequency Words. , 1996 .

[5]  Lois G. Dreyer,et al.  Children’s Acquisition and Retention of Word Spellings , 1995 .

[6]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[7]  G. Schulte-Körne,et al.  Das Marburger Rechtschreib-Training - Ergebnisse einer Kurzzeit-Intervention , 2001 .

[8]  R. Weiß,et al.  Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 CFT 20 , 1998 .

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[10]  R. Stelmack,et al.  The effect of picture priming on event-related potentials of normal and disabled readers during a word recognition memory task. , 1990, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[11]  F. Ramus,et al.  Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  T. Münte,et al.  Recognition memory for unfamiliar faces does not differ for adult normal and dyslexic readers: an event-related brain potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Schulte-Körne,et al.  Nachuntersuchung einer Stichprobe von lese-rechtschreibgestörten Kindern im Erwachsenenalter , 2003 .

[14]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[15]  Maureen W. Lovett,et al.  Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children : treatment and transfer effects , 1990 .

[16]  E L Wilding,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[17]  S. Graham,et al.  Spelling Instruction , 1990 .

[18]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[19]  S. Graham.  Handwriting and Spelling Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review , 1999 .

[20]  C. M. Scott.  Principles and Methods of Spelling Instruction: Applications for Poor Spellers , 2000 .

[21]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recollection of associative information. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  G. Schulte-Körne,et al.  Zur Diagnostik der Lese- Rechtschreibstörung , 2001 .

[23]  Michael E. Smith.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  K. Campbell,et al.  Recognition memory for words and event-related potentials: a comparison of normal and disabled readers. , 1988, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[25]  G. Schulte-Körne,et al.  Annotation: Genetics of reading and spelling disorder. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[26]  David R. Shanks,et al.  Abstractionist and Processing Accounts of Implicit Learning , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  F. Ramus,et al.  Developmental dyslexia : specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction ? , 2003 .

[28]  H Remschmidt,et al.  Familial aggregation of spelling disability. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[29]  H. Remschmidt,et al.  [Diagnosis of reading and spelling disorder]. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

[30]  G. Mangun,et al.  Brain potentials in developmental dyslexia: differential effects of word frequency in human subjects , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  M. Habib,et al.  The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: an overview and working hypothesis. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  T. Curran,et al.  The electrophysiology of incidental and intentionalretrieval: erp old⧸new effects in lexical decision andrecognition memory , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Merav Ahissar,et al.  Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  R. Abbott,et al.  Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. , 1998 .

[36]  M. Rugg.  Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.