Development of a Novel Automated Cell Isolation, Expansion, and Characterization Platform

Implementation of regenerative medicine in the clinical setting requires not only biological inventions, but also the development of reproducible and safe method for cell isolation and expansion. As the currently used manual techniques do not fulfill these requirements, there is a clear need to develop an adequate robotic platform for automated, large-scale production of cells or cell-based products. Here, we demonstrate an automated liquid-handling cell-culture platform that can be used to isolate, expand, and characterize human primary cells (e.g., from intervertebral disc tissue) with results that are comparable to the manual procedure. Specifically, no differences could be observed for cell yield, viability, aggregation rate, growth rate, and phenotype. Importantly, all steps-from the enzymatic isolation of cells through the biopsy to the final quality control-can be performed completely by the automated system because of novel tools that were incorporated into the platform. This automated cell-culture platform can therefore replace entirely manual processes in areas that require high throughput while maintaining stability and safety, such as clinical or industrial settings.

[1]  Anthony Ratcliffe,et al.  Bioreactors and Bioprocessing for Tissue Engineering , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Oliver Brüstle,et al.  Automated maintenance of embryonic stem cell cultures , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Richard Archer,et al.  Why tissue engineering needs process engineering , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  S Holm,et al.  Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: solute transport and metabolism. , 1981, Connective tissue research.

[5]  N. Boos,et al.  Age-Related Variation in Cell Density of Human Lumbar Intervertebral Disc , 2011, Spine.

[6]  David J. Williams,et al.  Manufacture of a human mesenchymal stem cell population using an automated cell culture platform , 2007, Cytotechnology.

[7]  David J. Williams,et al.  Automated, scalable culture of human embryonic stem cells in feeder‐free conditions , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  J. Mochida New strategies for disc repair: novel preclinical trials , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  David J. Williams,et al.  Human cell culture process capability: a comparison of manual and automated production , 2009, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[10]  L. Setton,et al.  Intervertebral Disc Cells Exhibit Differences in Gene Expression in Alginate and Monolayer Culture , 2001, Spine.

[11]  T. Niemeyer,et al.  Human Anulus Fibrosis and Nucleus Pulposus Cells of the Intervertebral Disc: Effect of Degeneration and Culture System on Cell Phenotype , 2005, Spine.

[12]  K. Lin,et al.  Characterization of adipose tissue-derived cells isolated with the Celution system. , 2008, Cytotherapy.

[13]  J E Prenosil,et al.  Computer Controlled Bioreactor for Large‐scale Production of Cultured Skin Grafts , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  S. Chandran,et al.  Automated Mechanical Passaging: A Novel and Efficient Method for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Expansion , 2006, Stem cells.

[15]  R. Deyo,et al.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. , 2008, JAMA.

[16]  J. O'Brien,et al.  1988 Volvo Award in Basic Science: Proteoglycan Synthesis in the Human Intervertebral Disc: Variation with Age, Region and Pathology , 1988, Spine.