Norms for 204 Literary and 260 Nonliterary Metaphors on 10 Psychological Dimensions

Norms on 464 metaphors are presented for 10 dimensions representing ratings of comprehensibility, some perceived metaphoric qualities, imagery values, familiarity, and tenor-vehicle relatedness. The items were either literary metaphors selected from works of poetry (N = 204) or nonliterary metaphors generated by the experimenters (N = 260). Analyses of the normative data indicated that (a) the mean ratings of the metaphors were reliable (average Cronbach alpha = 0.88); (b) even so, individuals varied in their reactions to the metaphors; (c) the 10 dimensions correlated substantially with one another; and (d) literary and nonliterary metaphors showed similar patterns for the descriptive and relational statistics examined. These data demonstrate the need for metaphor researchers to consider multiple attributes if they are to achieve less confounded or factorial variation of theoretically motivated variables. The normative data provided here exhibit sufficient variation among items and independence among sca...

[1]  Archer Taylor,et al.  The Oxford dictionary of English proverbs , 1937 .

[2]  Richard P. Honeck.  Interpretive versus structural effects on semantic memory , 1973 .

[3]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Understanding and appreciating metaphors , 1982, Cognition.

[4]  Memory for literary metaphors , 1979 .

[5]  Allyssa McCabe,et al.  Conceptual similarity and the quality of metaphor in isolated sentences versus extended contexts , 1983 .

[6]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The Structure of Analogical Models in Science. , 1980 .

[7]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Poetic comparisons: Psychological dimensions of metaphoric processing , 1985 .

[8]  C. Noble.  An analysis of meaning. , 1952, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dimensions of metaphor , 1983 .

[10]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms: Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93. , 1978 .

[11]  S. Kemper.  Comprehension and the interpretation of proverbs , 1981 .

[12]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Aptness in metaphor , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  L. Trick,et al.  The Domain Interaction Approach to Metaphor Processing: Relating Individual Differences and Metaphor Characteristics , 1986 .

[14]  J. Hobbs.  Metaphor Interpretation as Selective Inferencing: Cognitive Processes in Understanding Metaphor (Part 1) , 1983 .

[15]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  A. Katz.  Metaphoric relationships: The role of feature saliency , 1982 .

[17]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  A Functional Approach to Levels of Processing. , 1978 .

[18]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  On memory for metaphor , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[19]  B. A. Levy.  Proofreading familiar text: Constraints on visual processing , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[20]  R. Verbrugge,et al.  Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Richard P. Honeck,et al.  The conceptual base view of categorization , 1985 .

[23]  A. Ortony.  Beyond Literal Similarity , 1979 .