How to assess non-target effects of polyphagous biological control agents: Trichogramma brassicae as a case study.

We show key elements of the risk assessment conducted for Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid which is successfully used for control of the European corn borer in European countries. The main factors that we addressed in this study were: the potential of establishment; acceptance and parasitism of non-target butterflies under laboratory, field-cage and field conditions; the searching efficiency in non-target habitats; the dispersal capacities; and the potential for effects on other natural enemies in maize. Although high parasitism of non-target butterflies and other natural enemies were observed under laboratory conditions, very few eggs of the non-target species were attacked in the field. These findings may be explained by a low host searching efficiency and the observation that female T. brassicae do disperse only a few meters per day. We conclude that the possibility of using invertebrate agents with a broad host range in inundative biological control should not a priori be excluded, however, a thorough environmental risk assessment should be performed prior to release.

[1]  Franz Bigler,et al.  Environmental Impact of Invertebrates for Biological Control of Arthropods: Methods and Risk Assessment , 2006 .

[2]  F. Bigler,et al.  Methods Used to Assess Non-target Effects of Invertebrate Biological Control Agents of Arthropod Pests , 2005, BioControl.

[3]  P. Edwards,et al.  Parasitism of non-target lepidoptera by mass released Trichogramma brassicae and its implication for the larval parasitoid Lydella thompsoni , 2004, BioControl.

[4]  F. Bigler,et al.  Non‐target habitat exploitation by Trichogramma brassicae (Hym. Trichogrammatidae): what are the risks for endemic butterflies? , 2003 .

[5]  F. Bigler,et al.  Effects of mass releases of Trichogramma brassicae on predatory insects in maize , 2003 .

[6]  F. Bigler,et al.  Overwintering of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma brassicae in Northern Switzerland , 2003, BioControl.

[7]  P. Edwards,et al.  Dispersal and persistence of mass released Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in non-target habitats , 2003 .

[8]  F. Bigler,et al.  Non-target host acceptance and parasitism by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in the laboratory , 2003 .

[9]  F. Bigler,et al.  Parasitism of non-target butterflies by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under field cage and field conditions , 2003 .

[10]  M. Hochberg,et al.  THE RISKS OF BIOCONTROL: TRANSIENT IMPACTS AND MINIMUM NONTARGET DENSITIES , 2002 .

[11]  R. Stinner,et al.  TRICHOGRAMMA SPP. (HYMENOPTERA: TRICHOGRAMMATIDAE): FIELD HOSTS AND MULTIPLE PARASITISM IN NORTH CAROLINA , 1989 .

[12]  J. V. Lenteren,et al.  Host specificity in arthropod biological control, methods for testing and interpretation of the data , 2006 .

[13]  J. V. Lenteren,et al.  Guidance for information requirements for regulation of invertebrates as biological control agents (IBCAs) , 2004 .

[14]  D. Landis,et al.  Trichogramma Nontarget Impacts: A Method for Biological Control Risk Assessment , 2000 .

[15]  Jian J. Duan,et al.  Nontarget Effects of Biological Control , 2000, Springer US.

[16]  D. Andow,et al.  Biological Control: Use of Trichogramma in Maize – Estimating Environmental Risks , 1995 .