Students’ Energy Understanding Across Biology, Chemistry, and Physics Contexts

Energy is considered both as a disciplinary core idea and as a concept cutting across science disciplines. Most previous approaches studied progressing energy understanding in specific disciplinary contexts, while disregarding the relation of understanding across them. Hence, this study provides a systematic analysis of cross-disciplinary energy learning. On the basis of a cross-sectional study with n = 742 students from grades 6, 8, and 10, we analyze students’ progression in understanding energy across biology, chemistry, and physics contexts. The study is guided by three hypothetical scenarios that describe how the connection between energy understanding in the three disciplinary contexts changes across grade levels. These scenarios are compared using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results suggest that, from grade 6 to grade 10, energy understanding in the three disciplinary contexts is highly interrelated, thus indicating a parallel progression of energy understanding in the three disciplinary contexts. In our study, students from grade 6 onwards appeared to have few problems to apply one energy understanding across the three disciplinary contexts. These findings were unexpected, as previous research concluded that students likely face difficulties in connecting energy learning across disciplinary boundaries. Potential reasons for these results and the characteristics of the observed cross-disciplinary energy understanding are discussed in the light of earlier findings and implications for future research, and the teaching of energy as a core idea and a crosscutting concept are addressed.

[1]  David Fortus,et al.  The IQWST Experience: Using Coherence as a Design Principle for a Middle School Science Curriculum , 2008, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Jennifer M Claesgens,et al.  Launching the Space Shuttle by Making Water: The Chemist’s View of Energy , 2014 .

[3]  D. M. Watts,et al.  Some alternative views of energy , 1983 .

[4]  Anne McKeough,et al.  Developmental growth in students' concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database , 2005 .

[5]  Constantinos P. Constantinou,et al.  Teaching and learning about energy in middle school: an argument for an epistemic approach , 2012 .

[6]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[7]  Ricardo Trumper.  Applying Conceptual Conflict Strategies in the Learning of the Energy Concept , 1997 .

[8]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[9]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective , 2010 .

[10]  Ricardo Trumper,et al.  Teaching of Energy Issues: A Debate Proposal for a Global Reorientation , 2007 .

[11]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  A learning progression for water in socio‐ecological systems , 2012 .

[12]  M. Kurnaz,et al.  A Thematic Review of Some Studies Investigating Students’ Alternative Conceptions About Energy , 2011 .

[13]  Energy in Chemical Systems: An Integrated Approach , 2014 .

[14]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[15]  J. Hox,et al.  A checklist for testing measurement invariance , 2012 .

[16]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Measuring Knowledge Integration Learning of Energy Topics: A two-year longitudinal study , 2015 .

[17]  Arthur Eisenkraft,et al.  Introduction: Why Focus on Energy Instruction? , 2014 .

[18]  M. Stanisstreet,et al.  Misconceptions in First-Year Undergraduate Science Students about Energy Sources for Living Organisms. , 1991 .

[19]  Beth A. Lindsey,et al.  Student use of energy concepts from physics in chemistry courses , 2015 .

[20]  M. Linn,et al.  Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge? , 2000 .

[21]  Colin Boylan,et al.  Exploring elementary students' understanding of energy and climate change , 2008 .

[22]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Student understanding of energy: Difficulties related to systems , 2012 .

[23]  Knut Neumann,et al.  Students’ Energy Concepts at the Transition Between Primary and Secondary School , 2015 .

[24]  Sara Lacy,et al.  Looking Through the Energy Lens: A Proposed Learning Progression for Energy in Grades 3–5 , 2014 .

[25]  R. Driver,et al.  Students' use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations , 1985 .

[26]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective , 2005 .

[27]  S. Messick.  Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[28]  Julia Schwanewedel,et al.  Wie wird Energie im Biologieschulbuch dargestellt? – Entwicklung eines Kategoriensystems und exemplarische Anwendung auf eine Schulbuchreihe , 2016 .

[29]  Judith Barak,et al.  Understanding of energy in biology and vitalistic conceptions , 1997 .

[30]  Arthur Eisenkraft,et al.  Teaching and Learning of Energy in K-12 Education , 2014 .

[31]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Results and Implications of a 12-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning , 2005 .

[32]  Frackson Mumba,et al.  DIAGNOSING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF ENERGY AND ITS RELATED CONCEPTS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTEXT , 2012 .

[33]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Using Data Mining to Predict K-12 Students' Performance on Large-Scale Assessment Items Related to Energy. , 2008 .

[34]  R. Duschl.  The Second Dimension-Crosscutting Concepts: Understanding a Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2012 .

[35]  Knut Neumann,et al.  Towards a learning progression of energy , 2013 .

[36]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Curriculum Coherence and Learning Progressions , 2012 .

[37]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[38]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[39]  C. Fox,et al.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2001 .

[40]  R. Driver,et al.  Making sense of secondary science , 1994 .

[41]  J. Hox,et al.  A checklist for testing measurement invariance , 2012 .

[42]  Conclusion and Summary Comments: Teaching Energy and Associated Research Efforts , 2014 .

[43]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Student views of macroscopic and microscopic energy in physics and biology , 2012 .

[44]  L. Tang,et al.  The Progression of Students’ Conceptions of Energy: A Cross-Grade, Cross-Cultural Study , 2004 .

[45]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. , 2011 .

[46]  Rachael Lancor,et al.  Using Student-Generated Analogies to Investigate Conceptions of Energy: A multidisciplinary study , 2014 .

[47]  Erich Thies,et al.  Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland , 2000 .

[48]  David Fortus,et al.  Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy , 2015 .

[49]  R. Kirk.  Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come , 1996 .

[50]  Stephen J. Hook,et al.  Lift, squeeze, stretch, and twist: Research-based Inquiry Physics Experiences (RIPE) of energy for kindergartners , 2008 .

[51]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Assessing Understanding of the Energy Concept in Different Science Disciplines , 2016 .

[52]  L. Angeles.  Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes , 2002 .

[53]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing for Knowledge Integration: The Impact of Instructional Time , 2003 .

[54]  Amelia Wenk Gotwals,et al.  Learning progressions in science : current challenges and future directions , 2012 .

[55]  An Analysis of Metaphors Used by Students to Describe Energy in an Interdisciplinary General Science Course , 2015 .

[56]  Patrick L. Brown,et al.  Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) , 2018 .

[57]  Jeffrey Nordine,et al.  Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning , 2011 .

[58]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Conservation of Energy: An Analytical Tool for Student Accounts of Carbon-Transforming Processes , 2014 .