Measuring the Performance of Wastewater Treatment in China

When a developing country is undergoing a rapid growth period, agricultural wastewater, domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, and organic matter content in chemical oxygen demand (COD) usually increase in great amounts, causing environmental pollution. Thus, this paper proposes a summary of factors to assess the performance of wastewater discharge costs. Total fixed assets, population growth, and wastewater treatment expenses in various regions of China were used as input factors, while gross regional product, discharged wastewater, and discharged COD were used as output factors. We employed the directional distance function (DDF) method to compare 31 regions of China between 2011 and 2015. The results showed that areas with leading economic development and areas with a small population and vast natural land have good wastewater treatment efficiency. In the past five years, economic development and wastewater treatment expense efficiency in Chongqing have been improving, such that by the end of 2015, this region efficiency was approaching frontier efficiency. We also found that the efficiency of wastewater treatment expense in many areas often falls below 0.6, which is still very low. There is, thus, a large gap between the regions and the leading frontier regions, meaning that the efficiency of wastewater treatment expense needs to be improved.

[1]  Deborah Panepinto,et al.  Modeling of Po River Water Quality in Torino (Italy) , 2010 .

[2]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[3]  R. Fuentes,et al.  Productivity of wastewater treatment plants in the Valencia Region of Spain , 2017 .

[4]  Dominic C.Y. Foo,et al.  Water footprint and water pinch analysis techniques for sustainable water management in the brick-manufacturing industry , 2018 .

[5]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Continuous Optimization Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002 .

[6]  D. Luenberger Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[7]  Silvia Fiore,et al.  Evaluation of the energy efficiency of a large wastewater treatment plant in Italy , 2016 .

[8]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Air emissions perspective on energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China's coastal areas , 2017 .

[9]  Weixin Yang,et al.  Efficiency Evaluation and Policy Analysis of Industrial Wastewater Control in China , 2017 .

[10]  Yung‐ho Chiu,et al.  Undesirable output in efficiency and productivity: Example of the G20 countries , 2016 .

[11]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[13]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Lactic acid extraction using environmentally benign Green emulsion ionic liquid membrane , 2018 .

[14]  Ching-Ren Chiu,et al.  Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output , 2012 .

[15]  Fernando Fdz-Polanco,et al.  Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review , 2015 .

[16]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants: A data envelopment analysis approach integrating technical, economic, and environmental issues. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  G. Szekely,et al.  Membrane-Grafted Asymmetric Organocatalyst for an Integrated Synthesis–Separation Platform , 2018, ACS Catalysis.

[19]  Xinmin Zhang,et al.  Measuring the Performance of Industrial Green Development Using a Non-Radial Directional Distance Function Approach: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province in China , 2017 .

[20]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  W. Law,et al.  Floating, highly efficient, and scalable graphene membranes for seawater desalination using solar energy , 2018 .

[22]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Sustainable wastewater treatment and recycling in membrane manufacturing , 2015 .

[23]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Os , 2011 .

[24]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .

[25]  M. Ashfaq,et al.  Monitoring, mass balance and fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in seven wastewater treatment plants in Xiamen City, China. , 2018, Journal of hazardous materials.

[26]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Occurrence, removal and risk of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants across China: Comparison of wastewater treatment processes. , 2018, Water research.

[28]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[29]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[31]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[32]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Giulia Romano,et al.  Energy Efficiency Drivers in Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Double Bootstrap DEA Analysis , 2017 .

[34]  R. F. Rea,et al.  Network DEA , 1999 .