Intensive scaffolding in an intelligent tutoring system for the learning of algebraic word problem solving

The term intensive scaffolding refers to any set of conceptual scaffolding strategies that always allow the user to find the solution to a problem. Despite the many benefits of scaffolding, some negative effects have also been reported. These are mainly related to the possibility that a student solves the problems without actually engaging in their content. In this paper, we have used an intelligent tutoring system ( ITS) to analyze the effect that intensive scaffolding has on the learning of algebraic word problem solving ( AWPS). Two different versions of the ITS, which differ in the amount of scaffolding that they provide, have been created. These two versions were used by two groups of students in Secondary Education, in a quasi-experimental study. The comparison of pre- and posttest scores shows a significant increase of the competence in AWPS in the group that used the ITS with intensive scaffolding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  S. Puntambekar,et al.  Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? , 2005 .

[2]  Allan Collins,et al.  What is the most effective way to teach problem solving? A commentary on productive failure as a method of teaching , 2012 .

[3]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[4]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[5]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  Making the Case for the Use of Web-Based Portfolios in Support of Learning to Teach , 2002 .

[6]  K. VanLehn.  The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: a qualitative case study , 2011 .

[8]  David Arnau,et al.  Domain-specific knowledge representation and inference engine for an intelligent tutoring system , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[10]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning , 2001 .

[11]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation , 2001 .

[12]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors , 2007 .

[13]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[14]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[15]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Designing Knowledge Scaffolds to Support Mathematical Problem Solving , 2005 .

[16]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Scaffolding: An important teacher competency in online learning , 2003 .

[17]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Model-Based Diagnosis for Regulative Support in Inquiry Learning , 2013 .

[18]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[19]  David Arnau,et al.  Fundamentals of the design and the operation of an intelligent tutoring system for the learning of the arithmetical and algebraic way of solving word problems , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Detection and Analysis of Off-Task Gaming Behavior in Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.