Feasibility of 2 °C as a post-2020 warming threshold via input-constrained optimal control

Governments around the world have committed to urgent reductions in anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in order to limit the increase in global average temperature to less than 2 °C relative to pre-industrial levels, a warming level recognized as a key threshold for dangerous climate change. In the lead-up to a key United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) meeting in Paris in late 2015, countries have begun to announce GHG emission reduction pledges for the period beyond 2020. In this paper, we investigate feasibility of 2 °C as a post-2020 warming threshold via the solution of an input-constrained optimal control problem in which the control inputs to be optimized are the emissions reduction rate, and the fraction of net economic output invested in capital. Using the DICE (Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and the Economy) integrated assessment model (IAM), we show that rapid emissions reductions are necessary to reach global net zero emissions by mid-century and so restrict warming to 2 °C. Attempts to limit warming to 2 °C by constraining either the absolute rate, or rate of growth, in emissions reductions effort in a global post-2020 mitigation scheme are achievable only with appreciable loss of economic output, with total emissions falling sharply as a consequence. The results of this paper underscore the importance of recognizing the interdependence of geophysical and economic dynamics in attempting to stay below the 2 °C warming threshold.

[1]  Steven R. Weller,et al.  A receding horizon control approach to estimating the social cost of carbon in the presence of emissions and temperature uncertainty , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  W. Nordhaus Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon: Concepts and Results from the DICE-2013R Model and Alternative Approaches , 2014, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[3]  Delavane B. Diaz,et al.  Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy , 2015 .

[4]  Lars Grüne,et al.  Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Dynamic Decision Problems in Economics , 2015 .

[5]  Kenneth L. Judd,et al.  Continuous-Time Methods for Integrated Assessment Models , 2012 .

[6]  F. Ramsey,et al.  THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF SAVING , 1928 .

[7]  W. Nordhaus An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases , 1992, Science.

[8]  B. Kouvaritakis,et al.  LTV models in MPC for sustainable development , 2006 .

[9]  S. Randalls History of the 2°C climate target , 2010 .

[10]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Emission pathways consistent with a 2[thinsp][deg]C global temperature limit , 2011 .

[11]  Steven Clark,et al.  General Algebraic Modeling System , 2014 .

[12]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets , 2013 .

[13]  Alain Haurie,et al.  A stochastic control model for optimal timing of climate policies , 2007, Autom..

[14]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[15]  Basil Kouvaritakis,et al.  MPC as a tool for sustainable development integrated policy assessment , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Basil Kouvaritakis,et al.  Recent developments in stochastic MPC and sustainable development , 2004, Annu. Rev. Control..

[17]  Thomas Bruckner,et al.  Inverse Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: the Guard-rail Approach , 2008 .

[18]  Bing Chu,et al.  Using economic Model Predictive Control to design sustainable policies for mitigating climate change , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[19]  Ric D. Herbert,et al.  Constrained macroeconomic policy development with a separate predictive model , 2004, Math. Comput. Simul..

[20]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry , 2010, Nature.

[21]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[22]  N. Stern,et al.  Endogenous Growth, Convexity of Damages and Climate Risk: How Nordhaus' Framework Supports Deep Cuts in Carbon Emissions , 2014 .

[23]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne , 2009, Nature.

[24]  Benjamin Crost,et al.  Optimal climate policy: Uncertainty versus Monte Carlo ☆ , 2013 .

[25]  T. Stocker,et al.  The Closing Door of Climate Targets , 2013, Science.

[26]  Michael R. Bussieck,et al.  General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) , 2004 .

[27]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Emission pathways consistent with a 2 ◦ C global temperature limit , 2011 .

[29]  Antonis Papachristodoulou,et al.  Analysis and control design of sustainable policies for greenhouse gas emissions , 2013 .