Research article titles in written feedback on English as a second language writing

The titles of articles investigating written feedback on English as a second language writing are crucial to inform and attract the intended audience to read, download, and possibly cite the article in an increasingly crowded marketplace of research. The present study constituted a descriptive and regression analysis of 372 research article titles in order to generate insights into the title writing practices of authors in a narrow sub-disciplinary research concern and whether particular norms cohere with scholarly impact. It was found written feedback scholars opted for titles that emphasised informativeness, evinced through lengthy titles, uni-head nominal structures involving comprehensive pre-modification, and compound structures that juxtaposed a range of elaborated concerns (e.g., scope, description, methodology) with the research topic. Stepwise regression analysis revealed the use of non-alphanumeric characters negatively predicted the article’s age-weighted citation rate, while the syntactic/functional pattern effect  +  prepositional group was a significant positive indicator of citation rates. The results vary from previous findings at the disciplinary level of linguistics, indicating there is value in future studies of research article titles at the sub-disciplinary level. Written feedback researchers can utilise the findings to generate field-acceptable titles and possibly enhance their prospects of citations.

[1]  Shaofeng Li The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in SLA: A Meta-Analysis. , 2010 .

[2]  Hanna Pulaczewska,et al.  ‘I Bet They Are Going to Read It’: Reported Direct Speech in Titles of Research Papers in Linguistic Pragmatics , 2009 .

[3]  D. Ferris The ‘‘Grammar Correction’ ’ Debate in L2 Writing: , 2022 .

[4]  Izabela Uscinski L2 Learners’ Engagement with Direct Written Corrective Feedback in First-Year Composition Courses , 2017 .

[5]  Cuiqin Xu,et al.  Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008) , 2009 .

[6]  Luke D Plonsky,et al.  An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research , 2013 .

[7]  Allison Caras Written Corrective Feedback in Compositions and the Role of Depth of Processing , 2019 .

[8]  Michael Gibbert,et al.  What makes a ‘good’ title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science , 2016, Scientometrics.

[9]  V. Soler Writing Titles in Science: An Exploratory Study. , 2007 .

[10]  C. Paiva,et al.  Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often , 2012, Clinics.

[11]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context , 2008 .

[12]  Mohammad Reza Falahati Qadimi Fumani,et al.  The impact of title length and punctuation marks on article citations , 2015 .

[13]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners , 2013, Scientometrics.

[14]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[15]  Dardo de Vecchi,et al.  What do “They” Mean by That? , 2013 .

[16]  Chih-Hua Kuo,et al.  Research article titles in applied linguistics , 2012 .

[17]  Volker Hegelheimer,et al.  Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction , 2015 .

[18]  HarzingAnne-Wil A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013 , 2014 .

[19]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  R. Ellis EPILOGUE: A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback , 2010 .

[21]  Iman Tahamtan,et al.  Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature , 2016, Scientometrics.

[22]  David Wright,et al.  Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners , 2009 .

[23]  Olle Persson,et al.  The DCI index: Discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  ZhaoHong Han,et al.  The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis , 2015 .

[25]  Rahman Sahragard,et al.  A diachronic study on the information provided by the research titles of applied linguistics journals , 2016, Scientometrics.

[26]  Alan L. Mackay,et al.  Publish or perish , 1974, Nature.

[27]  Sally Wyatt,et al.  What a difference a colon makes: how superficial factors influence subsequent citation , 2013, Scientometrics.

[28]  Paul Wouters,et al.  Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories , 2019, SAGE Open.

[30]  D. Ferris The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .

[31]  Bhaskar Mukherjee,et al.  Short and amusing: The relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Investigating Teachers' Written Corrective Feedback Practices in a Saudi EFL Context: How Do They Align with Their Beliefs, Institutional Guidelines, and Students' Preferences?. , 2014 .

[33]  J. Bitchener Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development: Current Knowledge and Future Research , 2012 .

[34]  K. James Hartshorn,et al.  Written Corrective Feedback: Practitioners' Perspectives. , 2010 .

[35]  Philippa Mungra Metaphors among titles of medical publications: an observational study , 2007 .

[36]  Shaofeng Li,et al.  Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System , 2019, System.

[37]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[38]  Lynn M. Goldstein Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together , 2004 .

[39]  Sandra J. Savignon,et al.  Face-to-face and Computer-mediated Peer Review in EFL Writing , 2013 .

[40]  James Hartley,et al.  What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons , 2005, Scientometrics.

[41]  Jieru Xie,et al.  Accessibility and Update Status of Published Software: Benefits and Missed Opportunities , 2017, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..

[42]  Rod Ellis,et al.  A typology of written corrective feedback types , 2008 .

[43]  Hossein Nassaji,et al.  The effects of written corrective feedback , 2019, Instructed Second Language Acquisition.

[44]  Ken Hyland,et al.  What do they mean? Questions in academic writing , 2002 .

[45]  Neomy Storch,et al.  LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING , 2010, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[46]  Dan Brown,et al.  Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing , 2015 .

[47]  John Bitchener,et al.  Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. , 2008 .

[48]  Shulin Yu,et al.  Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students , 2018, Assessing Writing.

[49]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[50]  Rafael Ball,et al.  Scholarly communication in transition: The use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005 , 2009, Scientometrics.

[51]  Luke Plonsky,et al.  STUDY QUALITY IN SLA , 2013, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[52]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices , 2014 .

[53]  Sally Ashton-Hay Book review: Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills , 2014 .

[54]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners written accuracy , 2008 .

[55]  Staša Milojević,et al.  The Length and Semantic Structure of Article Titles—Evolving Disciplinary Practices and Correlations with Impact , 2017, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..

[56]  Omer Hassan Ali Mahfoodh “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback , 2017 .

[57]  Klaus Wohlrabe,et al.  Title characteristics and citations in economics , 2016, Scientometrics.

[58]  Rosa M. Manchón,et al.  What Do Learners Notice While Processing Written Corrective Feedback , 2019 .

[59]  Zhijun LI,et al.  The evolution of research article titles: the case of Journal of Pragmatics 1978–2018 , 2019, Scientometrics.

[60]  TahamtanIman,et al.  Factors affecting number of citations , 2016 .

[61]  Laurence Anthony,et al.  Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science , 2001 .

[62]  Yeu-Ting Liu,et al.  Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation , 2018 .

[63]  Rosa M. Manchón Chapter 1. Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing , 2011 .

[64]  T. Jacques,et al.  The impact of article titles on citation hits: an analysis of general and specialist medical journals , 2010, JRSM short reports.

[65]  Ye Han Written corrective feedback from an ecological perspective: The interaction between the context and individual learners , 2019, System.

[66]  F. Hyland,et al.  Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom , 2015 .

[67]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse , 2012 .

[68]  Estela Ene,et al.  Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition , 2018, Journal of Second Language Writing.

[69]  Yan Wang,et al.  A Corpus-Based Syntactic Study of Medical Research Article Titles. , 2007 .

[70]  R. Nagano,et al.  Conventions: A Corpus Study of Eight Disciplines , 2015 .

[71]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations , 2011, Scientometrics.

[72]  Huang Shi-xiang Academic Objections in EAP Writing——A Textual Analysis of "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes" , 2006 .

[73]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[74]  M. Haggan Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: dimensions of attraction , 2004 .

[75]  Peter Crosthwaite,et al.  Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice , 2019, Journal of Second Language Writing.

[76]  James Hartley,et al.  To Attract or to Inform: What are Titles for? , 2005 .

[77]  J. Hartley Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles , 2007 .

[78]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Methods and methodologies in second language writing research , 2016 .

[79]  D. Ferris THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[80]  Christoph Kueffer,et al.  Responsible Use of Language in Scientific Writing and Science Communication , 2014 .

[81]  John Bitchener,et al.  Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies , 2011, Language Teaching.

[82]  Sara Gesuato,et al.  Encoding of Information in Titles: Academic Pratices across Four Genres in Linguistics , 2008 .

[83]  J. Truscott The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .