Three-dimensional Volumetric Analysis of 3 Fat-Processing Techniques for Facial Fat Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Autologous fat grafting has revolutionized the field of facial soft-tissue augmentation, despite a lack of standardization. Objective data are needed to arrive at consensus regarding the best technique for optimal volume retention. Objective To compare 3 fat-processing techniques with 3-dimensional (3-D) technology to explore the optimal fat-processing technique for improving the volume retention of grafted fat. Design, Setting, and Participants From September 2015 to December 2016, patients with facial asymmetry were treated by initial facial fat grafting at the Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Sixty-three patients (21 per group) were randomized to 1 of 3 fat-processing techniques: sedimentation, centrifugation, and cotton pad filtration. Patients underwent 3-D scanning preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients who did not complete preoperative or postoperative follow-up and 3-D imaging were excluded from the analysis. Intervention Autologous fat grafting to correct facial asymmetry. Main Outcomes and Measures The percentage volume maintenance of each fat-processing technique was measured with 3-D software and analyzed with variance analysis. Results Of the 63 randomized patients, 30 (7 men, 23 women; mean [SD] age at surgery, 22.2 [8.0] years) completed follow-up. The mean (SD) percentage volume maintenance of the 3 groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was, respectively, 49% (4%), 45% (3%), 43% (3%), and 41% (3%) for the cotton pad filtration group; 41% (3%), 38% (4%), 36% (4%), and 34% (3%) for the centrifugation group; and 37% (4%), 34% (4%), 31% (3%), and 31% (3%) for sedimentation group. The variance analysis showed that the cotton pad filtration group demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage volume maintenance in comparison with the centrifugation and sedimentation groups. Conclusions and Relevance The use of 3-D technology provides an objective and accurate way to evaluate different fat-processing techniques. Autologous fat processed by cotton pad filtration had a significant higher volume retention than did that processed by centrifugation and sedimentation technique. Trial Registration chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-14005599 Level of Evidence 1.

[1]  Zuoliang Qi,et al.  Autologous Fat Grafting With Combined Three-Dimensional and Mirror-Image Analyses for Progressive Hemifacial Atrophy , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  M. Longaker,et al.  Autologous Fat Grafting: The Science Behind the Surgery. , 2016, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[3]  A. Vissink,et al.  What is the current optimal fat grafting processing technique? A systematic review. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[4]  Ye Zhang,et al.  Three-dimensional chest computed tomography analysis of thoracic deformities in patients with microtia. , 2015, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[5]  Rakesh K. Gupta,et al.  In Search of the Optimal Processing Technique for Fat Grafting , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[6]  Qingfeng Li,et al.  Lipotransfer: the potential from bench to bedside. , 2015, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  Robert A. Glasgold,et al.  Long-term volumetric retention of autologous fat grafting processed with closed-membrane filtration. , 2014, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[8]  S. D. Vecchio,et al.  The graft-to-capacity ratio: volumetric planning in large-volume fat transplantation. , 2014 .

[9]  D. D. Del Vecchio,et al.  The Graft-to-Capacity Ratio: Volumetric Planning in Large-Volume Fat Transplantation , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  P. Vogt,et al.  The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  Ron D. Shippert,et al.  Comparison of Harvest and Processing Techniques for Fat Grafting and Adipose Stem Cell Isolation , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  M. Vazquez,et al.  Fat graft transfer in children's facial malformations: a prospective three-dimensional evaluation. , 2013, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[13]  Min Zhu,et al.  Comparison of Three Different Fat Graft Preparation Methods: Gravity Separation, Centrifugation, and Simultaneous Washing with Filtration in a Closed System , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  P. Vogt,et al.  Autologous Fat Transplantation: Volumetric Tools for Estimation of Volume Survival. A Systematic Review , 2013, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[15]  L. Bucky,et al.  Fat grafting's past, present, and future: why adipose tissue is emerging as a critical link to the advancement of regenerative medicine. , 2012, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[16]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Fat Grafting: Evidence-Based Review on Autologous Fat Harvesting, Processing, Reinjection, and Storage , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  Lee L Q Pu,et al.  Towards more rationalized approach to autologous fat grafting. , 2012, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[18]  P. Vogt,et al.  [BEAULI™--a new and easy method for large-volume fat grafts]. , 2010, Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V....

[19]  I. Pitanguy,et al.  Influence of decantation, washing and centrifugation on adipocyte and mesenchymal stem cell content of aspirated adipose tissue: a comparative study. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[20]  D. Chung,et al.  Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  Hak Chang,et al.  Effects of Fat Preparation Methods on the Viabilities of Autologous Fat Grafts , 2010, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[22]  M. Klinger,et al.  Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS Fat Graft Task Force. , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  K. Gutowski Current Applications and Safety of Autologous Fat Grafts: A Report of the ASPS Fat Graft Task Force , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[24]  R. Glasgold,et al.  Autologous fat grafting: long-term evidence of its efficacy in midfacial rejuvenation. , 2009, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[25]  Keming Qi,et al.  Sonographic assessment on breast augmentation after autologous fat graft. , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  S. Richmond,et al.  Three‐dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[27]  Timothy A. Miller,et al.  Autologous Fat Transfer National Consensus Survey: Trends in Techniques for Harvest, Preparation, and Application, and Perception of Short- and Long-Term Results , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[28]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Autologous Human Fat Grafting: Effect of Harvesting and Preparation Techniques on Adipocyte Graft Survival , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  N. Carmi,et al.  Enhancing the Take of Injected Adipose Tissue by a Simple Method for Concentrating Fat Cells , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[30]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  In Search of Improved Fat Transfer Viability: A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Centrifugation and Harvest Site , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[31]  S. Coleman Hand rejuvenation with structural fat grafting. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[32]  E. Biemer,et al.  Technique for Liposuction Fat Reimplantation and Long‐Term Volume Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1991, Annals of plastic surgery.