The growing complexity in invention process

Technological and design process complexities may pose challenges to engineering design and related outcomes through invention. Understanding the trends related to the complexity of inventions and invention processes is crucial for informing engineering design research and education for invention, but has not been formally developed in the design literature. Herein, we utilize a set of patent-based metrics, drawn from complex systems research and engineering design research, to detect various aspects of the complexity in invention processes. By an analysis of U.S. patents from 1975 to 2011, our results suggest that technology inventions have been increasingly (1) requiring larger teams and more distant collaboration, (2) integrating a growing base of prior technologies, and (3) delivering more systemic and integrative new technologies. These trends may positively reinforce each other so as to contribute to a continual growth of the complexity in invention processes. Individual productivity for invention is also in decline, as we measured from the patent data. These findings suggest the increasing importance of research, education and application of complex system analysis methods and tools to control and manage the complexity in invention processes.

[1]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A functional approach for studying technological progress: Extension to energy technology , 2008 .

[2]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Measuring technological distance for patent mapping , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  A. Griffin The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[4]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Hierarchy in industry architecture : transaction strategy under technological constraints , 2010 .

[5]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Methods for Design of Engineering Systems , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[6]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[7]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Giorgio Triulzi,et al.  Mapping technology space by normalizing patent networks , 2015, Scientometrics.

[9]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[10]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management , 2011 .

[11]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[12]  R. Ackoff Towards a System of Systems Concepts , 1971 .

[13]  Davide Russo,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of patents and search for TRIZ contradictions , 2007 .

[14]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Discovering Structure in Design Databases Through Functional and Surface Based Mapping , 2013 .

[15]  Sougata Mukherjea,et al.  Information retrieval and knowledge discovery utilizing a biomedical patent semantic Web , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[16]  R. Badii,et al.  Complexity: Hierarchical Structures and Scaling in Physics , 1997 .

[17]  Cassandra Telenko,et al.  Designettes: New Approaches to Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Education , 2014 .

[18]  Derek Ruths,et al.  Control Profiles of Complex Networks , 2014, Science.

[19]  John E. Gaffney,et al.  Software Function, Source Lines of Code, and Development Effort Prediction: A Software Science Validation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[20]  K. Wood,et al.  Changing Conversations and Perceptions: The Research and Practice of Design Science , 2016 .

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[22]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[24]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[25]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Open Standards, Vertical Disintegration and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: How Vertically Specialised Firms Entered the U.S. Semiconductor Industry , 2015 .

[26]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[27]  Kaushik Sinha,et al.  Structural complexity: Quantification, validation and its systemic implications for engineered complex systems , 2013 .

[28]  John Deyst,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Metric of System Complexity With Application to Engineering System Design , 2012 .

[29]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[30]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products , 2007 .

[31]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[32]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Advances in product family and product platform design: Methods & applications , 2014 .

[33]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  The function-failure design method , 2005 .

[34]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[35]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[36]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[37]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  The Statistical Mechanics of Complex Product Development: Empirical and Analytical Results , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[38]  David A. Bearden,et al.  A complexity-based risk assessment of low-cost planetary missions: when is a mission too fast and too cheap? , 2003 .

[39]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[40]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Filtering patent maps for visualization of diversification paths of inventors and organizations , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[42]  The Sources of Invention. , 1958 .

[43]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[44]  Oded Maimon,et al.  The measurement of a design structural and functional complexity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[45]  Giorgio Triulzi,et al.  Mapping Technology Space by Normalizing Technology Relatedness Networks , 2015, ArXiv.

[46]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  A simulation-based method to evaluate the impact of product architecture on product evolvability , 2015 .

[47]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World , 2011 .

[48]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[49]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[50]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB , 2010 .

[51]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  A high-definition design structure matrix (HDDSM) for the quantitative assessment of product architecture , 2012 .

[52]  John L. Enos,et al.  Invention and Innovation in the Petroleum Refining Industry , 1962 .

[53]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Design Principles: Literature Review, Analysis, and Future Directions , 2016 .

[54]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Design-by-analogy: experimental evaluation of a functional analogy search methodology for concept generation improvement , 2015 .

[55]  Kevin Otto,et al.  An empirical foundation for product flexibility , 2005 .

[56]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  The united innovation process: integrating science, design, and entrepreneurship as sub-processes , 2015, Design Science.

[57]  Michel-Alexandre Cardin,et al.  Enabling Flexibility in Engineering Systems: A Taxonomy of Procedures and a Design Framework , 2014 .

[58]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Product development cycle time and commercial success , 1995 .

[59]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A functional approach for studying technological progress: Application to information technology ☆ , 2006 .

[60]  Joline Zepcevski,et al.  History of science and technology. , 2012 .

[61]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[62]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability , 2010 .

[63]  Hamdi A. Bashir,et al.  Estimating Design Complexity , 1999 .

[64]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  A Graph-Based Fault Identification and Propagation Framework for Functional Design of Complex Systems , 2008 .

[65]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Interorganizational transfer of knowledge: an analysis of patent citations of a defense firm , 1991 .

[66]  Gregory M. Mocko,et al.  Engineering design complexity: an investigation of methods and measures , 2008 .

[67]  Jonathan Huebner,et al.  A possible declining trend for worldwide innovation , 2005 .

[68]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Incorporating design effort complexity measures in product architectural design and assessment , 2005 .

[69]  Fabrice Alizon,et al.  Design Structure Matrix , 2006 .

[70]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Design Repositories: Engineering Design's New Knowledge Base , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[71]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Novelty, Conventionality, and Value of Invention , 2017 .

[72]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[73]  M. Newman Resource Letter CS-1: Complex Systems , 2011 .

[74]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Advancing Design Research: A “Big-D” Design Perspective , 2013 .

[75]  W. Arthur,et al.  Complexity and the economy , 2014, Science.

[76]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[77]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Identifying Patent Precedents for Engineering Design: An Iterative Heuristic Method of Mining Text, Citation and Inventor Information , 2017 .

[78]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[79]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[80]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The structure of invention , 2007 .

[81]  Alessandro Chessa,et al.  Is Europe Evolving Toward an Integrated Research Area? , 2013, Science.

[82]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[83]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[84]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Flexibility in Engineering Design , 2011 .

[85]  P. Murmann Expected development time reductions in the German mechanical engineering industry , 1994 .

[86]  R. S. Campbell,et al.  Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool , 1983 .

[87]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  The Nature of Technology , 2013 .