Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

[1]  A. Reis,et al.  Influence of Conditioning Time of Universal Adhesives on Adhesive Properties and Enamel-Etching Pattern. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[2]  A. Loguercio,et al.  Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[3]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  A. Reis,et al.  Effect of enamel bevel on retention of cervical composite resin restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  V. Rousson,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  M. Peumans,et al.  Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  Zhengmei Lin,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of self-etching adhesives with or without selective enamel etching in noncarious cervical lesions: A systematic review , 2014 .

[8]  M. Peumans,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  R. Nagpal,et al.  In vitro bonding effectiveness of three different one-step self-etch adhesives with additional enamel etching. , 2014, Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry.

[10]  N. Pandis,et al.  Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: common pitfalls and how to avoid them. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al.  Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  J. Costella,et al.  Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions—a systematic review , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[13]  J. Perdigão,et al.  A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[14]  M. Soyman,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  F. G. Oliveira Análise clínica e clínica/digital de restaurações de lesões cervicais não cariosas: efeitos dos sistemas adesivos e tempos de análise , 2013 .

[16]  M. Forghani,et al.  The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. , 2013, Operative dentistry.

[17]  J. Perdigão,et al.  A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. , 2013, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[18]  V. Rousson,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. , 2012, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[19]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. , 2012, Operative dentistry.

[20]  C. R. Perez,et al.  Restoration of Noncarious Cervical Lesions: When, Why, and How , 2011, International journal of dentistry.

[21]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  J. Attal,et al.  Effectiveness of a new one-step self-etch adhesive in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled practice-based study. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. , 2010, European journal of oral sciences.

[25]  Stephen Bayne,et al.  FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[26]  E. Ozel,et al.  One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions. , 2010, Australian dental journal.

[27]  A. Mine,et al.  Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[28]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  The design and analysis of split‐mouth studies: What statisticians and clinicians should know , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  Nicole S. Kimmes,et al.  Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[30]  V. Arana-Chavez,et al.  BOND STRENGTH AND MORPHOLOGY OF ENAMEL USING SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT ACIDITIES , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[31]  G. Townsend,et al.  Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. , 2009, Australian dental journal.

[32]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[34]  L. Baratieri,et al.  Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[35]  Stephen Bayne,et al.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[36]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[37]  L. Baratieri,et al.  A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[38]  D. Mercante,et al.  Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[39]  A. Reis,et al.  Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[40]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[41]  H. Sano Microtensile Testing, Nanoleakage, and Biodegradation of Resin-Dentin Bonds , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[42]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[43]  G. Schmalz,et al.  Reprint of Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[44]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[45]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[46]  A. Reis,et al.  An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions , 2005, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[47]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[48]  J. V. Dijken Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. , 2000 .

[49]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[50]  Yan Zhou,et al.  Prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions and associated risk indicators in middle-aged and elderly populations in Southern China. , 2015, The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association.

[51]  M. D. De Goes,et al.  Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. , 2014, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[52]  A. O. Afolabi,et al.  Distribution and characteristics of non carious cervical lesions in an adult Nigerian population. , 2012, Nigerian quarterly journal of hospital medicine.

[53]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[54]  J. Perdigão,et al.  In vitro bonding performance of self-etch adhesives: II--ultramorphological evaluation. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[55]  Lorenzo Breschi,et al.  Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[56]  L. S. Türkün The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[57]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. , 2003, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[58]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. , 2002, The journal of adhesive dentistry.