Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Reis,et al. Influence of Conditioning Time of Universal Adhesives on Adhesive Properties and Enamel-Etching Pattern. , 2016, Operative dentistry.
[2] A. Loguercio,et al. Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. , 2015, Operative dentistry.
[3] J. Perdigão,et al. Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? , 2015, Journal of dentistry.
[4] A. Reis,et al. Effect of enamel bevel on retention of cervical composite resin restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.
[5] V. Rousson,et al. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[6] M. Peumans,et al. Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[7] Zhengmei Lin,et al. Clinical effectiveness of self-etching adhesives with or without selective enamel etching in noncarious cervical lesions: A systematic review , 2014 .
[8] M. Peumans,et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[9] R. Nagpal,et al. In vitro bonding effectiveness of three different one-step self-etch adhesives with additional enamel etching. , 2014, Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry.
[10] N. Pandis,et al. Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: common pitfalls and how to avoid them. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.
[11] Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.
[12] J. Costella,et al. Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions—a systematic review , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[13] J. Perdigão,et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. , 2014, Operative dentistry.
[14] M. Soyman,et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[15] F. G. Oliveira. Análise clínica e clínica/digital de restaurações de lesões cervicais não cariosas: efeitos dos sistemas adesivos e tempos de análise , 2013 .
[16] M. Forghani,et al. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. , 2013, Operative dentistry.
[17] J. Perdigão,et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. , 2013, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].
[18] V. Rousson,et al. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. , 2012, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[19] J. Perdigão,et al. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. , 2012, Operative dentistry.
[20] C. R. Perez,et al. Restoration of Noncarious Cervical Lesions: When, Why, and How , 2011, International journal of dentistry.
[21] J. Sterne,et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[22] J. Attal,et al. Effectiveness of a new one-step self-etch adhesive in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled practice-based study. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[23] P. Lambrechts,et al. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[24] R. Frankenberger,et al. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. , 2010, European journal of oral sciences.
[25] Stephen Bayne,et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[26] E. Ozel,et al. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions. , 2010, Australian dental journal.
[27] A. Mine,et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[28] E. Lesaffre,et al. The design and analysis of split‐mouth studies: What statisticians and clinicians should know , 2009, Statistics in medicine.
[29] Nicole S. Kimmes,et al. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[30] V. Arana-Chavez,et al. BOND STRENGTH AND MORPHOLOGY OF ENAMEL USING SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT ACIDITIES , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.
[31] G. Townsend,et al. Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. , 2009, Australian dental journal.
[32] Sally Hopewell,et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[33] R. Frankenberger,et al. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[34] L. Baratieri,et al. Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[35] Stephen Bayne,et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[36] F. García-Godoy,et al. Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.
[37] L. Baratieri,et al. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[38] D. Mercante,et al. Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives. , 2006, Operative dentistry.
[39] A. Reis,et al. Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[40] Y. Hayashi,et al. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.
[41] H. Sano. Microtensile Testing, Nanoleakage, and Biodegradation of Resin-Dentin Bonds , 2006, Journal of dental research.
[42] P. Lambrechts,et al. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.
[43] G. Schmalz,et al. Reprint of Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[44] P. Lambrechts,et al. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[45] J. Perdigão,et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.
[46] A. Reis,et al. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions , 2005, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.
[47] P. Lambrechts,et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.
[48] J. V. Dijken. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. , 2000 .
[49] P. Lambrechts,et al. An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[50] Yan Zhou,et al. Prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions and associated risk indicators in middle-aged and elderly populations in Southern China. , 2015, The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association.
[51] M. D. De Goes,et al. Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. , 2014, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[52] A. O. Afolabi,et al. Distribution and characteristics of non carious cervical lesions in an adult Nigerian population. , 2012, Nigerian quarterly journal of hospital medicine.
[53] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.
[54] J. Perdigão,et al. In vitro bonding performance of self-etch adhesives: II--ultramorphological evaluation. , 2008, Operative dentistry.
[55] Lorenzo Breschi,et al. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[56] L. S. Türkün. The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[57] J. Perdigão,et al. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. , 2003, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].
[58] S. Armstrong,et al. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. , 2002, The journal of adhesive dentistry.