Modulation of DNA Binding Protein Affinity Directly Affects Target Site Demethylation

ABSTRACT It has recently been shown that in Xenopus, DNA demethylation at promoter regions may involve protein-DNA interactions, based on the specificity of the demethylated sites. Utilizing a stable episomal system in human cells, we recently mapped the sites and dissected the steps of demethylation at oriP sites bound by EBNA1 protein. Although it is clear that protein binding is required for demethylation of the oriP sites, it is uncertain whether this is a unique feature of the replication origin or whether it is a general phenomenon for all DNA sequences to which sequence-specific proteins are bound. In the present study, we utilize the well-defined Escherichia coli lac repressor/operator system in human cells to determine whether protein binding to methylated DNA, in a region that is neither a replication origin nor a promoter, can also lead to demethylation of the binding sites. We found that demethylation specified by protein binding is not unique to the replication origin or to the promoter. We also found that transcriptional activity does not influence demethylation of thelac operator. Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), an inhibitor of the lac repressor, can prevent demethylation of thelac operator DNA sites and can modulate demethylation of the lac operator by affecting the binding affinity of thelac repressor. Using this system, a titration of protein binding can be done. This titration permits one to infer that protein binding site occupancy is the determinant of demethylation at DNA sites and permits a determination of how this process progresses over time.

[1]  C. Hsieh In Vivo Activity of Murine De Novo Methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  E. Ballestar,et al.  Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Paul Tempst,et al.  MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[4]  M. Szyf,et al.  A mammalian protein with specific demethylase activity for mCpG DNA , 1999, Nature.

[5]  C. Hsieh Evidence that Protein Binding Specifies Sites of DNA Demethylation , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  C. Walsh,et al.  Cytosine methylation and mammalian development. , 1999, Genes & development.

[7]  H. Cedar,et al.  Analysis of putative RNase sensitivity and protease insensitivity of demethylation activity in extracts from rat myoblasts. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  E. Li,et al.  Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[9]  J. Silke,et al.  An embryonic demethylation mechanism involving binding of transcription factors to replicating DNA , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[10]  C. Walsh,et al.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[11]  A. Razin,et al.  DNA Demethylation In Vitro: Involvement of RNA , 1996, Cell.

[12]  C. Hsieh,et al.  Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[13]  A. Razin,et al.  DNA methylation from embryo to adult. , 1994, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[14]  M. Vairapandi,et al.  Enzymic removal of 5-methylcytosine from DNA by a human DNA-glycosylase. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  J. Jost,et al.  Nuclear extracts of chicken embryos promote an active demethylation of DNA by excision repair of 5-methyldeoxycytidine. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. P. Jost,et al.  DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance , 1993 .

[17]  H. Leonhardt,et al.  Structure, function and regulation of mammalian DNA methyltransferase. , 1993, EXS.

[18]  M. Lieber,et al.  V(D)J recombination on minichromosomes is not affected by transcription. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  J. Short,et al.  Modifications of the E.coli Lac repressor for expression in eukaryotic cells: effects of nuclear signal sequences on protein activity and nuclear accumulation. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  J. Short,et al.  Analysis of inducers of the E.coli lac repressor system in mammalian cells and whole animals. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  E. Selker DNA methylation and chromatin structure: a view from below. , 1990, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[22]  C. J. Collins,et al.  Stringent regulation of stably integrated chloramphenicol acetyl transferase genes by E. coli lac repressor in monkey cells , 1988, Cell.

[23]  Myles A Brown,et al.  Lac repressor can regulate expression from a hybrid SV40 early promoter containing a lac operator in animal cells , 1987, Cell.

[24]  M. C. Hu,et al.  The inducible Iac operator-repressor system is functional in mammalian cells , 1987, Cell.

[25]  A. Bird CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation , 1986, Nature.

[26]  W. Doerfler,et al.  DNA methylation and gene activity. , 1983, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  M. Barkley,et al.  Repressor Recognition of Operator and Effectors , 1980 .

[28]  Tom Maniatis,et al.  Transformation of mammalian cells with genes from procaryotes and eucaryotes , 1979, Cell.

[29]  A. Riggs,et al.  lac repressor--operator interaction. II. Effect of galactosides and other ligands. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  A. Riggs,et al.  Lac repressor-operator interaction. I. Equilibrium studies. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  B. Hirt Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. , 1967, Journal of molecular biology.