Nonlinear system-identification of the filling phase of a wet-clutch system

The work presented illustrates how the choice of input perturbation signal and experimental design improves the derived model of a nonlinear system, in particular the dynamics of a wet-clutch system. The relationship between the applied input current signal and resulting output pressure in the filling phase of the clutch is established based on bandlimited periodic signals applied at different current operating points and signals approximating the desired filling current signal. A polynomial nonlinear state space model is estimated and validated over a range of measurements and yields better fits over a linear model, while the performance of either model depends on the perturbation signal used for model estimation.

[1]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Iterative learning control for the filling of wet clutches , 2010 .

[2]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Identification of nonlinear systems using Polynomial Nonlinear State Space models , 2010, Autom..

[3]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  From experiment design to closed-loop control , 2005, Autom..

[4]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Excitation design for FRF measurements in the presence of nonlinear distortions , 2002 .

[5]  Eduardo F. Camacho,et al.  Model predictive control techniques for hybrid systems , 2010, Annu. Rev. Control..

[6]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[7]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .

[8]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Variance analysis of frequency response function measurements using periodic excitations , 2004, IMTC 2004.

[9]  Tadeusz P. Dobrowiecki,et al.  Design of broadband excitation signals with a user imposed power spectrum and amplitude distribution , 1998, IMTC/98 Conference Proceedings. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Where Instrumentation is Going (Cat. No.98CH36222).

[10]  L. Ljung,et al.  Subspace-based multivariable system identification from frequency response data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Design of broadband excitation signals , 1993 .

[12]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Iterative optimization of the filling phase of wet clutches , 2010, 2010 11th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC).

[13]  M. Schetzen The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems , 1980 .

[14]  D. Rees,et al.  Nonlinear disturbance errors in system identification using multisine test signals , 1993, 1993 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[15]  David Rees,et al.  ic Signals for Measuring , 1996 .

[16]  Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes,et al.  Hybrid modeling and identification of dry friction systems, application to a clutch actuator , 2010 .

[17]  Keith R. Godfrey,et al.  Perturbation signals for system identification , 1993 .

[18]  David Rees,et al.  Probing signals for measuring nonlinear Volterra kernels , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference - IMTC '95.

[19]  Johan Schoukens,et al.  Least-squares periodic signal modeling using orbits of nonlinear ODEs and fully automated spectral analysis , 2005, Autom..

[20]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Perspectives on system identification , 2010, Annu. Rev. Control..

[21]  Gerd Vandersteen,et al.  Robustness Issues of the Best Linear Approximation of a Nonlinear System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.