Factors affecting technology transfer offices' performance in the Italian food context

In recent years, growing attention has been devoted to the commercialisation of knowledge and technologies developed by universities and public research institutions. A central role in this particular process is played by the technology transfer offices (TTOs), which are on the one hand in charge of promoting the transfer of knowledge and technology to external companies, and on the other hand are also responsible for protecting and licensing the intellectual property of the research organisation. This paper is focused on a TTO operating in the food context, with the specific objectives of identifying the performance indicators and the main factors affecting its performance and, finally, analysing the relationships among these factors. Results highlighted the importance of both external and internal factors for the performance of a TTO operating in this context. In addition, we found both direct and indirect relations within these factors.

[1]  Firms’ R&D Activity and Intensity and the University–Enterprise Partnerships , 1998 .

[2]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Virtual Worlds as Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[4]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[5]  Lita Nelsen.  The Rise of Intellectual Property Protection in The American University , 1998, Science.

[6]  Alan Gibbons,et al.  Managing collaborative R&D projects development of a practical management tool , 2006 .

[7]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[8]  Marianna Succurro,et al.  Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy , 2013 .

[9]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[10]  Rod Taber,et al.  Knowledge processing with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1991 .

[11]  Jie Wu,et al.  Technological collaboration in product innovation: The role of market competition and sectoral technological intensity , 2012 .

[12]  Shigeo Abe,et al.  Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[13]  Barbara Bigliardi,et al.  Models of adoption of open innovation within the food industry , 2013 .

[14]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising , 2007 .

[15]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[16]  Jacques Viaene,et al.  Determinants of product and process innovation in small food manufacturing firms , 2004 .

[17]  Albert N. Link,et al.  University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence , 2005 .

[18]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Conjoint analysis of R&D contract agreements for industry-funded university research , 2012 .

[19]  R. Whitley.  Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks , 2002 .

[20]  O. Maietta,et al.  THE DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATION IN THE ITALIAN FOOD INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF R&D NETWORKING , 2008 .

[21]  M. Fritz,et al.  System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2010 , 2010 .

[22]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[23]  Lara Penco,et al.  Assisted technology transfer to SMEs: lessons from an exemplary case , 2001 .

[24]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[25]  Jiho Choi,et al.  Using fuzzy cognitive map for the relationship management in airline service , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[27]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[28]  Roger Sørheim,et al.  How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for university spin-offs: proof-of-concept, pre-seed, and seed funding , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[29]  Donato Iacobucci,et al.  Designing and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at Regional Level: Some Open Questions , 2014 .

[30]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[31]  Wim M.F. Jongen,et al.  New insights into consumer-led food product development , 2006 .

[32]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Licensing of University Inventions: The Role of a Technology Transfer Office , 2007 .

[33]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  The skills base of technology transfer professionals , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[34]  Anna Nosella,et al.  University-level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: an analysis of Italian academic spin-offs , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[35]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[36]  Ruth Rama,et al.  Empirical study on sources of innovation in international food and beverage industry , 1996 .

[37]  Olivier Debande,et al.  Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis , 2010 .

[38]  Ugo Rizzo,et al.  The determinants of academic patenting by Italian universities , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[40]  Gianluca Nardone,et al.  The determinants of university–industry collaboration in food science in Italy , 2012 .

[41]  Claudio Pizzi,et al.  Boundary spanning between industry and university: the role of Technology Transfer Centres , 2012 .

[42]  A. Link,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices : An Exploratory Study # , 1999 .

[43]  Seda Yanik Ugurlu,et al.  Evaluating the performance of technology transfer offices , 2011, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[44]  Mike Wright,et al.  Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[45]  Koenraad Debackere.  The TTO: a university engine transforming science into innovation , 2012 .

[46]  Massimo Bertolini,et al.  Assessment of human reliability factors: A fuzzy cognitive maps approach , 2007 .

[47]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[48]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The engaged university , 2012 .

[49]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[50]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. , 2002 .

[51]  Alp Üstündag,et al.  Evaluating Radio Frequency Identification Investments Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 2006, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[52]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[53]  Ruth Rama,et al.  Innovation in the European food products and beverages industry: Industry studies of innovation using C.I.S. data. European Information Monitoring System (EIMS). EIMS Publication No. 35 , 1996 .

[54]  Giuseppe Piroli,et al.  Efficiency and evaluation analysis of a network of technology transfer brokers , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[55]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[56]  Jonathan Simões Freitas,et al.  Structuration aspects in academic spin-off emergence: A roadmap-based analysis , 2013 .

[57]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi: A brief look backward and forward , 2011 .

[58]  Robert K. Carr.  Menu of best practices in technology transfer (Part 2) , 1992 .

[59]  Hsin-mei Lin,et al.  How technology policy facilitates technology diffusion and improves firm capability: a dynamic survey from a network perspective , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[60]  Marian Garcia Martinez,et al.  INNOVATION IN THE SPANISH FOOD AND DRINK INDUSTRY , 2000 .

[61]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Weiping Wu,et al.  Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities , 2010 .

[63]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[64]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  A framework for analysing innovation in the food sector. , 1997 .