What Do Donors Discriminate On? Evidence From Kiva.org

The rapid expansion and adoption of internet-based microfinance platforms have provided an opportunity for individuals to direct philanthropy towards specific causes to a degree not previously possible. In this paper, we make use of rich, individual loan-level data from www.kiva.org, an internet website that facilitates philanthropic cash transfers from small scale individual donors to specific microfinance loan recipients, to examine whether, and what patterns of, discrimination exist based on the choices made by these donors. We exploit detailed information provided on each borrower though objective loan information, pictures and textual descriptions to investigate the determinants of individual charitable giving. We find that donors appear to discriminate in favor of more attractive, lighter-skinned, and less obese borrowers, even as donors appear to systematically favor regions of the world where lighter skin is less prevalent. These effects are statistically and quantitatively significant and robust across a variety of specifications. Discrimination on the basis of physical attraction and skin color appears to be heightened for female borrowers, while obesity matters more for male borrowers.

[1]  Rebecca M. Blank,et al.  Race and gender in the labor market , 1999 .

[2]  William G. Holliday What's in a Picture?. , 1975 .

[3]  G. Becker,et al.  The Economics of Discrimination. , 1957 .

[4]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Automatic Preference for White Americans: Eliminating the Familiarity Explanation , 2000 .

[6]  C. Judd,et al.  The automaticity of race and Afrocentric facial features in social judgments. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  James Andreoni,et al.  Beauty, gender and stereotypes : Evidence from laboratory experiments , 2008 .

[8]  Rebel A. Cole Availability of Credit to Small and Minority-Owned Businesses: Evidence from the 1993 National Survey of Small Business Finances * , 1999 .

[9]  K. Arrow The Theory of Discrimination , 1971 .

[10]  Do-Yeong Kim Voluntary Controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) , 2003 .

[11]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Beauty and the Labor Market , 1993 .

[12]  Ariane Szafarz,et al.  Microfinance and Gender: Is There a Glass Ceiling in Loan Size? , 2010 .

[13]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White , 2022 .

[14]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer,et al.  Screening in New Credit Markets: Can Individual Lenders Infer Borrower Creditworthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending? , 2009 .

[15]  A. Feingold Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[16]  W. Graziano,et al.  Physical Attractiveness, Sex Role Orientation, and the Evaluation of Adults and Children , 1987 .

[17]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. , 1994 .

[18]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[19]  J. Andreoni Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Enrichetta Ravina Love & Loans: The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit Markets , 2012 .

[21]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Devin G. Pope,et al.  What’s in a Picture? , 2011, The Journal of Human Resources.

[23]  M. Brewer,et al.  What are we really priming? Cue-based versus category-based processing of facial stimuli. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[25]  Charles M Judd,et al.  The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: judging by features and categories. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  John A. List,et al.  The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment , 2009 .

[27]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Evidence on Discrimination in Mortgage Lending , 1998 .

[28]  Aimée M. Surprenant,et al.  Implicit attitudes can be measured. , 2001 .

[29]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  M. R. Solomon,et al.  Thinking about Fashion Models' Looks: A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Perceived Physical Attractiveness , 1996 .

[31]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[32]  J. Andreoni IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[33]  Ulrich Kühnen,et al.  Meta-Cognition about Biological Sex and Gender-Stereotypic Physical Appearance: Consequences for the Assessment of Leadership Competence , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[34]  Tanya Rosenblat,et al.  Why Beauty Matters ∗ , 2005 .

[35]  G. L. Lorenzo,et al.  What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood , 2010, Psychological science.

[36]  Raj M. Desai,et al.  Do Philanthropic Citizens Behave Like Governments? Internet-Based Platforms and the Diffusion of International Private Aid , 2009 .

[37]  Pierre Ly,et al.  Individual Preferences Over NGO Projects: Evidence from Microlending on Kiva , 2010 .

[38]  I. Blair,et al.  Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. , 2001 .