Electrophysiological and behavioral indicants of selective attention to multifeature gratings

The mechanisms underlying selective attention to gratings consisting of a particular conjunction of spatial frequency and orientation were investigated by means of both visual evoked potential (VEP) and behavioral measures. The effects of selective attention upon the VEP indicated two general types of selection processes: one which is specific to the features contained in the relevant gratings and is most pronounced approximately 225 msec post-stimulation, and another which is specific to the conjunction of features defining the relevant grating and is most pronounced 250–375 msec following the presentation of the stimulus. The behavioral responses primarily reflected this latter, or grating-specific, attentional process. The results are discussed in terms of the role of sensory feature channels in mediating selective attention to visual stimuli and are related to various information processing models of visual pattern selection.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[2]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  Introduction to human information processing , 1977 .

[3]  Arjun Sahgal,et al.  Categorization and retrieval after selective inferotemporal lesions in monkeys , 1978, Brain Research.

[4]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[5]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Size and orientation specificity of transient visual evoked potentials in man , 1978, Vision Research.

[7]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Binocular interaction of orientation and spatial frequency channels: Evoked potentials and observer sensitivity , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  G. Keren Some considerations of two alleged kinds of selective attention. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  V. Towle,et al.  Size specificity and interocular suppression: Monocular evoked potentials and reaction times , 1976, Vision Research.

[10]  F H Previc,et al.  Size-specific information channels and selective attention: visual evoked potential and behavioral measures. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .

[12]  G. Lockhead Processing dimensional stimuli: a note. , 1972, Psychological review.

[13]  M R Harter,et al.  Intra-modality selective attention and evoked cortical potentials to randomly presented patterns. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Hans-Lukas Teuberi THE BRAIN AND HUMAN BEHAVIOUR , 1958, Ulster medical journal.

[15]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Cortical Visual Areas and Their Interactions , 1972 .

[16]  V. Towle,et al.  Orientation-specific and luminance effects: interocular suppression of visual evoked potentials in man. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Esther Saraga,et al.  Parallel processing of the attributes of single stimuli , 1973 .

[18]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space , 1977 .

[19]  C J Aine,et al.  Event‐Related Potentials to Stroop Stimuli , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  M. Russell Harter,et al.  Effects of attention and arousal on visually evoked cortical potentials and reaction time in man , 1969 .

[21]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Attention to pattern orientation: negative cortical potentials, reaction time, and the selection process. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.