Automatic real‐time calibration, assessment, and maintenance of generic Raman models for online monitoring of cell culture processes

Raman spectroscopy is a multipurpose analytical technology that has found great utility in real‐time monitoring and control of critical performance parameters of cell culture processes. As a process analytical technology (PAT) tool, the performance of Raman spectroscopy relies on chemometric models that correlate Raman signals to the parameters of interest. The current calibration techniques yield highly specific models that are reliable only on the operating conditions they are calibrated in. Furthermore, once models are calibrated, it is typical for the model performance to degrade over time due to various recipe changes, raw material variability, and process drifts. Maintaining the performance of industrial Raman models is further complicated due to the lack of a systematic approach to assessing the performance of Raman models. In this article, we propose a real‐time just‐in‐time learning (RT‐JITL) framework for automatic calibration, assessment, and maintenance of industrial Raman models. Unlike traditional models, RT‐JITL calibrates generic models that can be reliably deployed in cell culture experiments involving different modalities, cell lines, media compositions, and operating conditions. RT‐JITL is a first fully integrated and fully autonomous platform offering a self‐learning approach for calibrating and maintaining industrial Raman models. The efficacy of RT‐JITL is demonstrated on experimental studies involving real‐time predictions of various cell culture performance parameters, such as metabolite concentrations, viability, and viable cell density. RT‐JITL framework introduces a paradigm shift in the way industrial Raman models are calibrated, assessed, and maintained, which to the best of authors' knowledge, have not been done before.

[1]  Biao Huang,et al.  A switching strategy for adaptive state estimation , 2018, Signal Process..

[2]  Ludovic Duponchel,et al.  Developing global regression models for metabolite concentration prediction regardless of cell line , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  A. Kudelski Analytical applications of Raman spectroscopy. , 2008, Talanta.

[4]  Jean Paul Remon,et al.  Applications of Raman spectroscopy in pharmaceutical analysis , 2002 .

[5]  Rafael M Santos,et al.  Monitoring mAb cultivations with in‐situ raman spectroscopy: The influence of spectral selectivity on calibration models and industrial use as reliable PAT tool , 2018, Biotechnology progress.

[6]  Hamidreza Mehdizadeh,et al.  Generic Raman‐based calibration models enabling real‐time monitoring of cell culture bioreactors , 2015, Biotechnology progress.

[7]  M. Vossoughi,et al.  Designed Amino Acid Feed in Improvement of Production and Quality Targets of a Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  D. Kell,et al.  Noninvasive, On-Line Monitoring of the Biotransformation by Yeast of Glucose to Ethanol Using Dispersive Raman Spectroscopy and Chemometrics , 1999 .

[9]  Alan G. Ryder,et al.  Performance monitoring of a mammalian cell based bioprocess using Raman spectroscopy. , 2013, Analytica chimica acta.

[10]  Gyun Min Lee,et al.  CHO cells in biotechnology for production of recombinant proteins: current state and further potential , 2012, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  Biao Huang,et al.  Designing priors for robust Bayesian optimal experimental design , 2012 .

[12]  Terrence M. Dobrowsky,et al.  Quick generation of Raman spectroscopy based in‐process glucose control to influence biopharmaceutical protein product quality during mammalian cell culture , 2016, Biotechnology progress.

[13]  Aditya Tulsyan,et al.  Advances in industrial biopharmaceutical batch process monitoring: Machine‐learning methods for small data problems , 2018, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Nicholas R. Abu-Absi,et al.  Real time monitoring of multiple parameters in mammalian cell culture bioreactors using an in-line Raman spectroscopy probe. , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  M. Andersen,et al.  Amino acid and glucose metabolism in fed‐batch CHO cell culture affects antibody production and glycosylation , 2015, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Fei Liu,et al.  Estimation and identification in batch processes with particle filters , 2019, Journal of Process Control.

[17]  Colin Jaques,et al.  Development of generic raman models for a GS‐KOTM CHO platform process , 2018, Biotechnology progress.

[18]  Brian Glennon,et al.  In situ Raman spectroscopy for simultaneous monitoring of multiple process parameters in mammalian cell culture bioreactors , 2012, Biotechnology progress.

[19]  Cenk Undey,et al.  A machine‐learning approach to calibrate generic Raman models for real‐time monitoring of cell culture processes , 2019, Biotechnology and bioengineering.