A Study of the Minimum Safe Distance between Human Driven and Driverless Cars Using Safe Distance Model

When driving,it is vital to maintain the right following distance between the vehicles to avoid rear-end collisions. The minimum safe distance depends on many factors, however, in this study the safe distance between the human-driven vehicles and a fully autonomous vehicle at a sudden stop by an automatic emergency brake was studied based on the human driver ability to react in an accident, the vehicles' braking system performance, and the speed of vehicles. For this approach, a safe distance car-following model was proposed to describe the safe distance between vehicles on a single lane dry road under conditions where both vehicles keep moving at a constant speed, and a lead autonomous vehicle suddenly stops by automatic emergency braking at an imminent incident. The proposed model then finally was being tested using MATLAB simulation, and results showed that confirmed the effectiveness of this model and the influence of driving speed and inter-vehicle distance on the rear-end collision was also indicated as well compared with the two and three seconds rule of safe following distance. The three seconds safe distance following rules is safe to be applied for all speed limits; however, the two seconds can be used on speed limits up to 45 Km/hr. A noticeable increase in rear-end collision was observed according to the simulation results if a car follows a driverless vehicle with two seconds rule above 45 km/hr.

[1]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[2]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Vehicle automation and driving performance , 1998 .

[3]  Wuhong Wang,et al.  A simplified car-following model based on the artificial potential field , 2016 .

[4]  Akhilesh Kumar Maurya,et al.  Study of Deceleration Behaviour of Different Vehicle Types , 2012 .

[5]  Yuan-Lin Chen,et al.  Vehicle Safety Distance Warning System: A Novel Algorithm for Vehicle Safety Distance Calculating Between Moving Cars , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[6]  R. Sivanandan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION MODEL FOR HETEROGENEOUS TRAFFIC USING OBJECT ORIENTED APPROACH , 2008 .

[7]  C. Greco.  Real-Time Forward Urban Environment Perception for an Autonomous Ground Vehicle Using Computer Vision and LIDAR , 2008 .

[8]  Santokh Singh,et al.  Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey , 2015 .

[9]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[10]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Determinants of following headway in congested traffic , 2009 .

[11]  Alexei Makarenko,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle in an Urban Environment , 2007, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[12]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014 .

[13]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Microscopic Simulation of Congested Traffic , 2000 .

[14]  A Touran,et al.  A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Dayi Qu,et al.  Modeling of Car-Following Required Safe Distance Based on Molecular Dynamics , 2014 .

[16]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.

[17]  Alberto Broggi,et al.  Extensive Tests of Autonomous Driving Technologies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Venkatesan Kanagaraj,et al.  Object-oriented methodology for intersection simulation model under heterogeneous traffic conditions , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[19]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  New Car-Following Model considering Impacts of Multiple Lead Vehicle Types , 2013 .