Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Future Coronary Events.

Importance Recurrent coronary events in patients with recent myocardial infarction remain a major clinical problem. Noninvasive measures of coronary atherosclerotic disease activity have the potential to identify individuals at greatest risk. Objective To assess whether coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity as assessed by noninvasive imaging is associated with recurrent coronary events in patients with myocardial infarction. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, longitudinal, international multicenter cohort study recruited participants aged 50 years or older with multivessel coronary artery disease and recent (within 21 days) myocardial infarction between September 2015 and February 2020, with a minimum 2 years' follow-up. Intervention Coronary 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography and coronary computed tomography angiography. Main Outcomes and Measures Total coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity was assessed by 18F-sodium fluoride uptake. The primary end point was cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction but was expanded during study conduct to include unscheduled coronary revascularization due to lower than anticipated primary event rates. Results Among 2684 patients screened, 995 were eligible, 712 attended for imaging, and 704 completed an interpretable scan and comprised the study population. The mean (SD) age of participants was 63.8 (8.2) years, and most were male (601 [85%]). Total coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity was identified in 421 participants (60%). After a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR, 3-5 years), 141 participants (20%) experienced the primary end point: 9 had cardiac death, 49 had nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 83 had unscheduled coronary revascularizations. Increased coronary plaque activity was not associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.89-1.76; P = .20) or unscheduled revascularization (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.64-1.49; P = .91) but was associated with the secondary end point of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (47 of 421 patients with high plaque activity [11.2%] vs 19 of 283 with low plaque activity [6.7%]; HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.07-3.10; P = .03) and all-cause mortality (30 of 421 patients with high plaque activity [7.1%] vs 9 of 283 with low plaque activity [3.2%]; HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.15-5.12; P = .02). After adjustment for differences in baseline clinical characteristics, coronary angiography findings, and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score, high coronary plaque activity was associated with cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.00-3.10; P = .05) but not with all-cause mortality (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.90-4.49; P = .09). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with recent myocardial infarction, coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity was not associated with the primary composite end point. The findings suggest that risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in patients with elevated plaque activity warrants further research to explore its incremental prognostic implications.

[1]  M. Hacker,et al.  In Vivo Coronary 18F-Sodium Fluoride Activity: Correlations With Coronary Plaque Histological Vulnerability and Physiological Environment. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain. , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Peper,et al.  External validation of the GRACE risk score and the risk–treatment paradox in patients with acute coronary syndrome , 2022, Open Heart.

[4]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Thoracic Aortic 18F-Sodium Fluoride Activity and Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  G. Hillis,et al.  Coronary 18F-sodium fluoride PET detects high-risk plaque features on optical coherence tomography and CT-angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome. , 2020, Atherosclerosis.

[6]  G. Watts,et al.  18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography Activity Predicts the Development of New Coronary Artery Calcifications , 2020, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[7]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary 18F-Fluoride Uptake and Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Ex vivo 18F-fluoride uptake and hydroxyapatite deposition in human coronary atherosclerosis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[10]  D. Dey,et al.  Respiration-averaged CT versus standard CT attenuation map for correction of 18F-sodium fluoride uptake in coronary atherosclerotic lesions on hybrid PET/CT , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  D. Dey,et al.  Observer repeatability and interscan reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride coronary microcalcification activity , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  D. Newby,et al.  Clinical endpoint adjudication , 2020, The Lancet.

[13]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary 18F-Sodium Fluoride Uptake Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Dey,et al.  Whole-vessel coronary 18F-sodium fluoride PET for assessment of the global coronary microcalcification burden , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  F. Lin,et al.  18F-NaF PET/CT in Ex Vivo Human Coronary Arteries With Histological Correlation. , 2019, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[16]  Habib Samady,et al.  Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study , 2019, The Lancet.

[17]  V. Fuster,et al.  From Detecting the Vulnerable Plaque to Managing the Vulnerable Patient: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Joshua D. Hutcheson,et al.  18F-Fluoride Signal Amplification Identifies Microcalcifications Associated With Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability in Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Images , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  D. Dey,et al.  Feasibility of Coronary 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron-Emission Tomography Assessment With the Utilization of Previously Acquired Computed Tomography Angiography , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[21]  D. Dey,et al.  Optimization of reconstruction and quantification of motion-corrected coronary PET-CT , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[22]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Clinical Relevance of 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron-Emission Tomography in Noninvasive Identification of High-Risk Plaque in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[23]  W. Ouwehand,et al.  Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [18F]FDG PET Imaging , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  Damini Dey,et al.  Motion Correction of 18F-NaF PET for Imaging Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  E. Warburton,et al.  Identifying active vascular microcalcification by 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography , 2015, Nature Communications.

[27]  M. Dweck,et al.  18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[28]  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  TIMI, GRACE and alternative risk scores in Acute Coronary Syndromes: a meta-analysis of 40 derivation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies on 31,625 patients. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.

[29]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  G. Raff,et al.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[31]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study). , 2010, European heart journal.

[33]  Michael G. Stabin,et al.  SNM Practice Guideline for Sodium 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans 1.0* , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[36]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging.

[37]  K. Murugiah,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of recurrent acute myocardial infarction in China , 2020, Heart.

[38]  D. Dey,et al.  Predictors of 18F-sodium fluoride uptake in patients with stable coronary artery disease and adverse plaque features on computed tomography angiography. , 2019, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[39]  T. Ichida,et al.  World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki , 2008, Gastroenterologia Japonica.