Managing relationships to improve performance: a case study in the global aerospace industry

Organizations wishing to succeed in the competitive climate of the contemporary marketplace will need to differentiate themselves from competitors. World-class product development is considered the key to competitive advantage and, to compete effectively in global markets, organizations need to be proficient at this core activity. The knowledge-intensive process of product development will benefit from strategic alliances with customers based on trust and mutual benefit. This paper reports on research which developed a managerial tool that allows manufacturing organizations to understand the impacts of relationships at the boundaries of their internal and external activities. It focuses upon the importance of collaboration to forming and maintaining productive relationships within and between organizations. Such an approach will help organizations, and the individuals within them, to identify appropriate internal and inter-organizational network development strategies. An important assumption that underlies its development is that the model will improve project and product development performance by improving communication flows through enhanced networked relationships between team members, and hence improve the overall performance of the organization. This paper sets the research context and presents results of action research with a team of engineers from a large organization in the aerospace industry. It reveals the crucial importance of trust in underpinning successful internal and inter-organizational relationships. It is suggested that the tool provides a convenient methodology for measuring and benchmarking relational network performance.

[1]  L. Prusak,et al.  How to invest in social capital. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[2]  L. Zucker Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[3]  Naomi J. Brookes,et al.  A boundary-based view of product development—a feasibility study , 2002 .

[4]  Fiona Lettice,et al.  Structuring product development in the 21st century: boundary management in the motor industry , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).

[5]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[6]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[7]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[8]  F. Frost,et al.  The use of strategic tools by small and medium-sized enterprises: an Australasian study , 2003 .

[9]  Fiona Lettice,et al.  Working the boundaries in the motor industry , 2000 .

[10]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[11]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1962 .

[12]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Susan McClure Do you read me? , 1994 .

[14]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[15]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  A TAXONOMY OF RELATIONSHIP APPROACHES DURING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED, INDUSTRIAL MARKETS , 1999 .

[16]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation , 1997 .

[17]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Organigraphs: drawing how companies really work. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[18]  Magnus Sverke,et al.  The Consequences of Job Insecurity for Employers and Unions: Exit, Voice and Loyalty , 2003 .

[19]  R. Kanter Leadership and the psychology of turnarounds. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[20]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  Concurrent engineering: The manufacturing philosophy for the 90's , 1991 .

[21]  Daniel J. Brass Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[22]  S. Read Applications of Case Study Research , 2003 .

[23]  Isabelle Bouty Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[24]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[25]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[26]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Concurrent engineering : what's working where , 1997 .

[27]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[28]  D. Chauvel,et al.  Chapter 11 – Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[29]  Sandro Castaldo,et al.  The Value of Trust , 2007 .

[30]  K. Newton Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy , 2001 .

[31]  M. Pagel,et al.  Social networks: we get by with (and in spite of) a little help from our friends. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[33]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[34]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  C. Anumba,et al.  Supply chain implications of concurrent engineering , 2000 .

[36]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[37]  V. Herzog,et al.  2000 International Student Paper Award Winner: Trust Building on Corporate Collaborative Project Teams , 2001 .

[38]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Managing innovation in the information age , 1994 .

[39]  J. Dingle Project Management, Orientation for Decision Makers , 1997 .

[40]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  The Generative Cycle: Linking Knowledge and Relationships , 1997 .

[41]  Roderick M. Kramer Social Uncertainty and Collective Paranoia in Knowledge Communities: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt , 1999 .

[42]  John Stark,et al.  Competing by Design: Creating Value and Market Advantage in New Product Development , 1994 .

[43]  J. Swan,et al.  Trust and inter-organizational networking , 2000 .

[44]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[45]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[46]  Susan Carlson Skalak An Introduction to Concurrent Engineering , 2002 .

[47]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: Text with Cases , 1995 .

[48]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  The Product Development Challenge: Competing Through Speed, Quality, and Creativity (A Harvard Business Review Book) (Проблема создания новых продуктов: конкурируя посредством скорости, качества и креативности) , 1995 .

[49]  Joanne Roberts From Know-how to Show-how? Questioning the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[50]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[51]  O. Williamson Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization , 1993, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[52]  C. Syan Introduction to concurrent engineering , 1994 .

[53]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness , 1962 .

[54]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[55]  Guido Möllering Ideal-types of Trust and The Role of Suspension , 2003 .

[56]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[57]  F. Lyon Trust, Networks and Norms: The Creation of Social Capital in Agricultural Economies in Ghana , 2000 .