A kinematic and dynamic comparison of surface and underwater displacement in high level monofin swimming.

Fin swimming performance can be divided into underwater and surface water races. World records are about 10% faster for underwater swimming vs. surface swimming, but little is known about the advantage of underwater swimming for monofin swimming. Some authors reported that the air-water interface influences the kinematics and leads to a narrow vertical amplitude of the fin. On the one hand, surface swimming is expected to affect drag parameters (cross-sectional area (S) and active drag (AD)) when compared to underwater swimming. On the other hand, the surface swimming technique may also affect efficiency (eta(F)). The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate and compare drag parameters and efficiency during underwater and surface swimming. To this end, 12 international level monofin swimmers were measured during both underwater and surface swimming. Kinematic parameters (both dimensional and non-dimensional), eta(F) (calculated according to the Elongated-Body Theory), and AD (computed with Velocity Perturbation Method) were calculated for an underwater and a surface fin swimming trial, performed at maximal speed. As expected, results showed significantly lower velocities during surface swimming vs. underwater V(1,under) =2.5ms(-1) vs. V(1,surf) =2.36ms(-1), p<.01). Velocities during underwater and surface swimming were strongly correlated (r=.97, p<.01). Underwater swimming was also associated with higher vertical amplitudes of the fin compared to surface swimming (V(under) =0.55mvs. V(surf) )=0.46m, p<.01). Length-specific amplitudes (A(under)/L(b)) were in the order of 20% during underwater swimming as for undulating fish, and significantly higher than during surface swimming (A(surf)/L(b)=17%, p<.01). Efficiency for surface swimming was about 6% lower than for underwater swimming (eta(F,under) =0.79 vs. eta(F,surf) =0.74, p<.01). This decrease could be associated with an increase in swimming frequency for surface swimming (f (surf)=2.15Hz vs. f (under)=2.08Hz, p<.01). Active drag during surface swimming was about 7% higher than for underwater swimming (AD(under) =78.9N vs. AD(surf) =84.7N, p<.01). A significantly smaller cross-sectional area for surface swimming (S(under) =0.053m(2) vs. S(surf) =0.044m(2), p<.01) and higher drag coefficient for surface swimming (C(d,under) =0.47 vs. C(d,surf) =0.69, p<.01) were measured. Finally, correlation between cross-sectional area and vertical amplitude of the fin was reported for both underwater and surface swimming. These results suggest that the performance improvement during underwater swimming is not only linked to a wave drag reduction effect but also to a specific swimming technique due to the free surface.

[1]  D. Weihs.  The hydrodynamics of dolphin drafting , 2004, Journal of biology.

[2]  C. Kennewell,et al.  Perth, Western Australia , 2008 .

[3]  Huub M. Toussaint,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of peak performance in human swimming , 2005 .

[4]  P. Zamparo,et al.  Energy cost of front-crawl swimming at supra-maximal speeds and underwater torque in young swimmers , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[5]  Daniel Daly,et al.  What dolphins tell us about hydrodynamics , 1998 .

[6]  R. Thukral,et al.  KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF SURFACE AND UNDERWATER FIN-SWIMMING , 1999 .

[7]  Alberto E. Minetti,et al.  Economy and efficiency of swimming at the surface with fins of different size and stiffness , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[8]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject. , 1959, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  A comparison of the kinematics of the dolphin kick in humans and cetaceans. , 2009, Human Movement Science.

[10]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  The Speed of Swimming of Fish as Related to Size and to the Frequency and Amplitude of the Tail Beat , 1958 .

[11]  B. Wilson,et al.  Wave drag on human swimmers. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A. E. Minetti,et al.  An energy balance of front crawl , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  D G Lloyd,et al.  Net forces during tethered simulation of underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques of the freestyle turn , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  Huub M Toussaint,et al.  The determination of drag in front crawl swimming. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  T. Hung.  Life in Moving Fluids—The physical biology of flow , 1988 .

[16]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII , 1996 .

[17]  van,et al.  HYDRODYNAMIC RESISTANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF HUMANS, DOLPHINS AND SHIP FORMS , 1988 .

[18]  R. McNeill Alexander,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of animal locomotion , 1977 .

[19]  Huub M. Toussaint,et al.  WAVE DRAG IN FRONT CRAWL SWIMMING , 2002 .

[20]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of depth and velocity on drag during the streamlined guide. , 2000 .

[21]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  J. Chatard,et al.  Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX , 2003 .

[23]  B. Watier,et al.  A kinematic study of finswimming at surface. , 2004, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[24]  Ross Sanders,et al.  Validity of the use of a fixed point for intracycle velocity calculations in swimming. , 2009, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[25]  S. Vogel.  Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[26]  Marek Rejman,et al.  Searching for criteria in evaluating the monofin swimming turn from the perspective of coaching and improving technique. , 2008, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[27]  P Zamparo,et al.  How fins affect the economy and efficiency of human swimming. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  Eric Berton,et al.  How are Strouhal number, drag, and efficiency adjusted in high level underwater monofin-swimming? , 2007, Human movement science.

[29]  M. V. Lomonosov,et al.  ACTIVE DRAG, USEFUL MECHANICAL POWER OUTPUT AND HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE COEFFICIENT IN DIFFERENT SWIMMING STROKES AT MAXIMAL VELOCITY , 1992 .