The principles, procedures and pitfalls in identifying archaeological and historical wood samples.

BACKGROUND The science of wood anatomy has evolved in recent decades to add archaeological and historical wood to its repertoire of documenting and characterizing modern and fossil woods. The increasing use of online wood anatomy databases and atlases has fostered the adoption of an international consensus regarding terminology, largely through the work of the International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA). SCOPE AND CONCLUSIONS This review presents an overview for the general reader of the current state of principles and procedures involved in the study of the wood anatomy of archaeological and historical specimens, some of which may be preserved through charring, waterlogging, desiccation or mineral replacement. By means of selected case studies, the review evaluates to what extent varying preservation of wood anatomical characteristics limits the level of identification to taxon. It assesses the role played by increasingly accessible scanning electron microscopes and complex optical microscopes, and whether these, on the one hand, provide exceptional opportunities for high-quality imaging and analysis of difficult samples, but, on the other hand, might be misleading the novice into thinking that advanced technology can be a substitute for specialized botanical training in wood anatomy.

[1]  F. Schweingruber,et al.  Woods of the Sahara and the Sahel : an anatomical atlas , 2000 .

[2]  Peter Gasson,et al.  IAWA list of microscopic features for softwood identification , 2004 .

[3]  Prof. Dr. Sherwin Carlquist,et al.  Comparative Wood Anatomy , 2001, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[4]  R. Cowling,et al.  Fossil wood charcoal assemblages from Elands Bay Cave, South Africa: implications for Late Quaternary vegetation and climates in the winter‐rainfall fynbos biome , 1999 .

[5]  D. M. Wilson.  The Collections of the British Museum , 1989 .

[6]  Elisabeth A. Wheeler,et al.  Inside Wood – A Web resource for hardwood anatomy , 2011 .

[7]  C. Cartwright.  Cedrus Libani under the microscope; the anatomy of modern and ancient Cedar of Lebanon wood , 2001 .

[8]  C. Cartwright,et al.  An Aboriginal shield collected in 1770 at Kamay Botany Bay: an indicator of pre-colonial exchange systems in south-eastern Australia , 2014, Antiquity.

[9]  C. Ramsey,et al.  Birdmen, cemís and duhos: material studies and AMS 14C dating of Pre-Hispanic Caribbean wood sculptures in the British Museum , 2013 .

[10]  C. Cartwright.  Identifying the woody resources of Diepkloof Rock Shelter (South Africa) using scanning electron microscopy of the MSA wood charcoal assemblages , 2013 .

[11]  J. Sheldon.  Microscopic wood anatomy. Structural variability of stems and twigs in recent and subfossil woods from central Europe: By Fritz H. Schweingruber. 1978. 226 pp. Birmensdorf: Swiss Federal Institute of Forestry Research. 28 Sw.Fr , 1979 .

[12]  J. Parkington,et al.  The Wood Charcoal Assemblages from Elands Bay Cave, Southwestern Cape: Principles, Procedures and Preliminary Interpretation , 1997 .

[13]  C. Cartwright.  The Bronze Age Wooden Tomb Furniture from Jericho: The Microscopical Reconstruction of a Distinctive Carpentry Tradition , 2005 .

[14]  C. Cartwright,et al.  Portrait mummies from Roman Egypt: ongoing collaborative research on wood identification , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Gasson,et al.  IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Hardwood Identification by an IAWA Committee , 1989 .