Bristles reduce the force required to ‘fling’ wings apart in the smallest insects

ABSTRACT The smallest flying insects commonly possess wings with long bristles. Little quantitative information is available on the morphology of these bristles, and their functional importance remains a mystery. In this study, we (1) collected morphological data on the bristles of 23 species of Mymaridae by analyzing high-resolution photographs and (2) used the immersed boundary method to determine via numerical simulation whether bristled wings reduced the force required to fling the wings apart while still maintaining lift. The effects of Reynolds number, angle of attack, bristle spacing and wing–wing interactions were investigated. In the morphological study, we found that as the body length of Mymaridae decreases, the diameter and gap between bristles decreases and the percentage of the wing area covered by bristles increases. In the numerical study, we found that a bristled wing experiences less force than a solid wing. The decrease in force with increasing gap to diameter ratio is greater at higher angles of attack than at lower angles of attack, suggesting that bristled wings may act more like solid wings at lower angles of attack than they do at higher angles of attack. In wing–wing interactions, bristled wings significantly decrease the drag required to fling two wings apart compared with solid wings, especially at lower Reynolds numbers. These results support the idea that bristles may offer an aerodynamic benefit during clap and fling in tiny insects. Highlighted Article: Long bristles on the wings of the smallest insects reduce the force required to ‘fling’ the wings apart while still maintaining lift.

[1]  C. Brennen,et al.  Swimming and Flying in Nature , 1975, Springer US.

[2]  R. Piedrahita,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics of Fish Gill Rakers During Crossflow Filtration , 2012, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[4]  J. Huber,et al.  The Australian Genera of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) , 2007, Zootaxa.

[5]  A. Robichon,et al.  Nano-architecture of gustatory chemosensory bristles and trachea in Drosophila wings , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  T. Maxworthy Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’ , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Hank Childs,et al.  VisIt: An End-User Tool for Visualizing and Analyzing Very Large Data , 2011 .

[8]  S. Sunada,et al.  Fluid-dynamic characteristics of a bristled wing. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  M. Lighthill On the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional numerical simulations of the clap–fling–sweep of hovering insects , 2010 .

[11]  T. Weis-Fogh Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals , 1973 .

[12]  T. Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the fling , 2007 .

[13]  A. Y. Cheer,et al.  Paddles and rakes: Fluid flow through bristled appendages of small organisms* , 1987 .

[14]  Daniel Weihs,et al.  Creeping flow around a finite row of slender bodies in close proximity , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Hiroyuki Ai,et al.  Vibration receptive sensilla on the wing margins of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori. , 2010, Journal of insect physiology.

[16]  G. Spedding,et al.  The generation of circulation and lift in a rigid two-dimensional fling , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  D. Weihs,et al.  Comb Wings for Flapping Flight at Extremely Low Reynolds Numbers , 2008 .

[19]  C. Peskin,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics of `clap and fling' in the smallest insects , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  P. Gorham Ballooning Spiders: The Case for Electrostatic Flight , 2013, 1309.4731.

[21]  Knut Schmidt-Nielsen Swimming and flying , 1984 .

[22]  J. Huber,et al.  The genus Mymaromella (Hymenoptera: Mymarommatidae) in North America, with a key to described extant species , 2008 .

[23]  C. Ellington,et al.  Wing mechanics and take-off preparation of Thrips (Thysanoptera). , 1980 .

[24]  WHEN DOES MOTION RELATIVE TO NEIGHBORING SURFACES ALTER THE FLOW THROUGH ARRAYS OF HAIRS? , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Nicholas A. Battista,et al.  A Mathematical Model and MATLAB Code for Muscle-Fluid-Structure Simulations. , 2015, Integrative and comparative biology.

[26]  J. Huber,et al.  REVIEW OF EUSTOCHUS, A RARELY COLLECTED GENUS OF MYMARIDAE (HYMENOPTERA) , 2007 .

[27]  F. Lehmann,et al.  The aerodynamic benefit of wing–wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  - 1-A COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS STUDY OF ‘ CLAP AND FLING ’ IN THE SMALLEST INSECTS , 2004 .

[29]  Arvind Santhanakrishnan,et al.  Clap and fling mechanism with interacting porous wings in tiny insect flight , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  J. Huber,et al.  Two new Australian species of Stethynium (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), larval parasitoids of Ophelimus maskelli (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on Eucalyptus , 2006 .

[31]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The aerodynamic effects of wing–wing interaction in flapping insect wings , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  Hiroyuki Ai,et al.  Sensors and Sensory Processing for Airborne Vibrations in Silk Moths and Honeybees , 2013, Sensors.

[33]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element version of the immersed boundary method , 2012 .

[34]  John T. Huber,et al.  A new genus and species of fairyfly, Tinkerbella nana (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), with comments on its sister genus Kikiki, and discussion on small size limits in arthropods , 2013 .

[35]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[36]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Vorticity generation during the clap–fling–sweep of some hovering insects , 2010 .

[37]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Validation of a simple method for representing spheres and slender bodies in an immersed boundary method for Stokes flow on an unbounded domain , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[38]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[39]  D. Weihs,et al.  Flow Around a Comb Wing in Low-Reynolds-Number Flow , 2012 .

[40]  Shannon K Jones,et al.  A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Smallest Flying Insects , 2016 .

[41]  C. Peskin,et al.  Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  E. Barta Motion of slender bodies in unsteady Stokes flow , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[43]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.