Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities.

Increased use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) raises concerns about their environmental impacts, but the effects of metal oxide ENPs on environmental processes and the organisms that carry them out remain largely unknown. This study evaluated the impacts of TiO2 and ZnO ENPs on soil bacterial communities. Soils collected from a California grassland were exposed to different doses of nanoparticulate TiO2 (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg g(-1) soil) and ZnO (0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 mg g(-1) soil) in microcosms over 60 days. The effects on soil microbial biomass were assessed by substrate induced respiration (SIR) and total extractable soil DNA. The effects on bacterial community composition were evaluated by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Total soil respiration indicated impacts on overall microbial activity. We found that both nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO reduced both microbial biomass (as indicated by declines in both SIR and DNA) and diversity (by T-RFLP). Both types of nanoparticles also altered the composition of the soil bacterial community. The effect of nano-ZnO was stronger than that of nano-TiO2, as reflected by lower DNA and stronger shifts in bacterial community composition for nano-ZnO at the same exposure concentration (0.5 mg g(-1) soil). Thus, nanoparticulate metal oxides may measurably and negatively impact soil bacterial communities.

[1]  G. Sparling,et al.  Modifications to the substrate-induced respiration method to permit measurement of microbial biomass in soils of differing water contents , 1986 .

[2]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand,et al.  Effects of C60 fullerene nanoparticles on soil bacteria and protozoans , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[4]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  V. Colvin.  The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  E. Delong,et al.  The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles , 2008, Science.

[7]  J. Niemeyer,et al.  Determination of free DNA in soils , 2002 .

[8]  E. Witter,et al.  Extractable dsDNA and product formation as measures of microbial growth in soil upon substrate addition , 1999 .

[9]  Loring Nies,et al.  Impact of fullerene (C60) on a soil microbial community. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  J. Schimel,et al.  Drying and rewetting effects on C and N mineralization and microbial activity in surface and subsurface California grassland soils , 2008 .

[11]  Pedro J J Alvarez,et al.  Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO water suspensions. , 2006, Water research.

[12]  Patricia A Holden,et al.  Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Mark Crane,et al.  The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[14]  Anne Kahru,et al.  Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[15]  H. O N G T A O W A N G,et al.  Stability and Aggregation of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Natural Aqueous Matrices , 2010 .

[16]  Noah Fierer,et al.  Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles , 2003 .

[17]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[18]  G. Lowry,et al.  Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[19]  Lawrence O. Ticknor,et al.  Phylogenetic Specificity and Reproducibility and New Method for Analysis of Terminal Restriction Fragment Profiles of 16S rRNA Genes from Bacterial Communities , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  A. Ramette.  Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[21]  Murray Wolinsky,et al.  Response to Comment by Volkov et al. on "Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil" , 2006, Science.

[22]  M. Benedetti,et al.  Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. , 2006, Nano letters.

[23]  Richard D Handy,et al.  Impact of silver nanoparticle contamination on the genetic diversity of natural bacterial assemblages in estuarine sediments. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  T. Lueders,et al.  Evaluation of PCR Amplification Bias by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Small-Subunit rRNA and mcrA Genes by Using Defined Template Mixtures of Methanogenic Pure Cultures and Soil DNA Extracts , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  Y. Matsumiya,et al.  Evaluation of soil bacterial biomass using environmental DNA extracted by slow-stirring method , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[26]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[28]  T. Anderson,et al.  Quantitative Isolation of Microbial DNA from Different Types of Soils of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems , 2003, Microbiology.

[29]  P. Holden,et al.  Extracellular DNA in Single- and Multiple-Species Unsaturated Biofilms , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  Arturo A Keller,et al.  Impacts of metal oxide nanoparticles on marine phytoplankton. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  J. Prosser,et al.  Growth of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in soil microcosms is inhibited by acetylene. , 2009, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[32]  Guodong Yuan,et al.  Nanoparticles in the Soil Environment , 2008 .

[33]  Eugene L. Madsen,et al.  Identifying microorganisms responsible for ecologically significant biogeochemical processes , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[34]  X. Guan,et al.  Relationship between dsDNA, chloroform labile C and ergosterol in soils of different organic matter contents and pH. , 2000 .

[35]  J. P. E. AND-N.  A PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SOILS , 2022 .

[36]  Jamie R Lead,et al.  Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[37]  W. Whitman,et al.  Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[39]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids) , 2007 .

[40]  Michael A. Wilson,et al.  Nanomaterials in soils , 2008 .