Knowledge Management Research & Practice (2009) 7, 192–195. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2009.20 This special issue on Knowledge Management and e-Research Technologies aims to provide a distinctive perspective on the role of technology in knowledge work. We begin with the assumption that today’s knowledge work and research practice is increasingly mediated by a diversity of tools which may not traditionally be labelled as knowledge management technologies (Hendriks, 2001; Butler, 2002), but which are embedded within knowledge work practices. Although many have criticised the idea of formal knowledge management technology (Swan et al., 1999; Galliers & Newell, 2001; Hislop, 2002), it is highly apparent that contemporary knowledge work is facilitated using information and communications technologies (ICTs) of various types from the ‘macro’ knowledge management systems that have been heavily criticised to the more ‘micro’ emerging technologies that we may not traditionally associate with the term knowledge management technology. This special issue, therefore, returns to the debate on the role of technology within knowledge creation, dissemination and use, but explores this with a specific focus on the how new, flexible ICTs are emerging, which blur the boundary between technology and social knowledge practices. Within knowledge management theory, it is possible to observe two broad and enduring perspectives towards technology (elaborated persuasively and famously by Hansen et al. (1999) but also by Alavi & Leidner (2001); Schultze & Stabell (2004)) between those who seek to catalogue and capture knowledge within computer systems, believing knowledge as capable of objective representation and is therefore capable of codification (Schultze, 1998), and those who believe knowledge to be inherently tacit and social, and who argue technology’s role is to support collaboration (Schultze, 1998). Both perspectives seem much evident in literature on Knowledge Management Systems, which frequently adopts a view of ‘knowledge management’ through the management of either catalogued, codified, data or of collaborative, social relationships. These two perspectives of codification or collaboration have, however, created, in our opinion, an unhelpful dichotomy and instrumentalisation of ‘knowledge management technology’ (Mitev & Venters, 2009) leading to polarised literature of either codification technology or collaborative systems. This special issue thus seeks to present articles that will stimulate the debate on the interrelationship and connection between technology aiming to codify knowledge and that aimed at collaboration. Our argument is founded on the observation that human action is mediated by tools, in a myriad of forms, which have a materiality to us and form part of our ongoing practice (Orlikowski, 2007; Orlikowski & Scott, 2008). That knowledge is socially constructed through social interaction is Knowledge Management Research & Practice (2009) 7, 192–195 & 2009 Operational Research Society. All rights reserved 1477–8238/09
[1]
Susan Leigh Star,et al.
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
,
1999
.
[2]
C. P. Goodman,et al.
The Tacit Dimension
,
2003
.
[3]
Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.
The entanglement of technology and work in organizations
,
2008
.
[4]
W. Orlikowski.
Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work
,
2007
.
[5]
Lars Mathiassen,et al.
Towards a theory of organizational information services
,
2008,
J. Inf. Technol..
[6]
Ulrike Schultze,et al.
Knowing What You Don't Know? Discourses and Contradictions in Knowledge Management Research
,
2004
.
[7]
Nathalie N. Mitev,et al.
Self-reflexive evaluation of an academic-industry management research collaboration: instrumentalisation in developing knowledge management technology
,
2007
.
[8]
Sue Newell,et al.
Back to the Future: From Knowledge Management to Data Management
,
2001,
ECIS.
[9]
Vladimir Iordanskii,et al.
Servants of Power
,
1999
.
[10]
Donald Hislop,et al.
Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology
,
2002,
J. Inf. Technol..
[11]
Robert M. Mason,et al.
The Critical Role of the Librarian/Information Officer as Boundary Spanner Across Cultures
,
2007
.
[12]
Richard Hull.
“The Great Lie: Markets, Freedom and Knowledge”
,
2006
.
[13]
Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.
Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues
,
2001,
MIS Q..
[14]
野中 郁次郎,et al.
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How
,
1995
.
[15]
Mary Bradley,et al.
Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know
,
2000
.
[16]
Morten T. Hansen,et al.
What's your strategy for managing knowledge?
,
1999,
Harvard business review.
[17]
E. L. Cox,et al.
Investigating The Contradictions In Knowledge Management
,
1998
.
[18]
Tim O'Reilly,et al.
What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
,
2007
.
[19]
H. D. Thomas,et al.
SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
,
1998
.
[20]
Will Venters,et al.
Reflexive Evaluation of an Academic–Industry Research Collaboration: Can Mode 2 Management Research Be Achieved?
,
2009
.
[21]
Jacky Swan,et al.
Knowledge Management - The Next Fad to Forget People?
,
1999,
ECIS.
[22]
Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.
Many rivers to cross: from ICT to knowledge management systems
,
2001,
J. Inf. Technol..
[23]
David Bawden,et al.
Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology
,
2007,
J. Documentation.
[24]
J. Overhage,et al.
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
,
2001,
Annals of Internal Medicine.
[25]
Exploring the Reality of Knowledge Management Systems : A Case Study
,
2002
.