The steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine during once daily and twice daily dosing in HIV-1-infected individuals

ObjectiveTo investigate and to compare the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in a dosing regimen of 400 mg once daily versus 200 mg twice daily in HIV-1-infected individuals. DesignOpen-label, randomized, cross-over study. MethodsTwenty HIV-1-infected individuals who already used nevirapine as part of their antiretroviral regimen were randomized to continue their current regimen (200 mg twice daily) or to switch to the alternate regimen (400 mg once daily). The steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nevirapine were assessed after 2 weeks during a 24-h period. Subsequently, patients were switched to the alternate regimen and the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine were assessed again after 2 weeks. Non-compartmental methods were used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC[24h]), and the maximal (Cmax) and minimal plasma concentration (Cmin), the time to Cmax (tmax), the plasma elimination half-life (t1/2), the apparent oral clearance (Cl/ F) and the apparent volume of distribution (V/ F). Differences in these pharmacokinetic parameters for the two dosing regimens were tested using ANOVA. ResultsThe exposure to nevirapine, as measured by the AUC[24h], was not significantly different between the 400 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily dosing regimen (P  = 0.60). Furthermore, the values for tmax, t1/2Cl/ F and V/ F were not significantly different between the two dosing regimens (P  ⩾ 0.08). However, Cmax and Cmin were higher and lower, respectively, when nevirapine was used in the once daily regimen as compared with the twice daily regimen. The median values for Cmax and Cmin as measured for the once daily and twice daily regimens were 6.69 and 5.74 μg/ml, respectively (P  = 0.03), and 2.88 and 3.73 μg/ml, respectively (P  < 0.01). ConclusionThese data show that the daily exposure to nevirapine, as measured by the plasma AUC[24h], is not different between a 400 mg once daily and a 200 mg twice daily dosing regimen. However, Cmax and Cmin are higher and lower, respectively, for the once daily regimen as compared with the twice daily regimen. The clinical implications of these differences remain to be established.

[1]  D Johnson,et al.  The value of patient-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in predicting virologic and immunologic response. California Collaborative Treatment Group. , 1999, AIDS.

[2]  A. Telenti,et al.  Why is highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) not prescribed or discontinued? Swiss HIV Cohort Study. , 1999, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[3]  Julio S. G. Montaner,et al.  Suppression of plasma viral load below 20 copies/ml is required to achieve a long‐term response to therapy , 1998, AIDS.

[4]  J. Beijnen,et al.  Rapid determination of nevirapine in human plasma by ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[5]  V. M. Shadle,et al.  Self-reported antiretroviral therapy in injection drug users. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  B. Bruguerolle,et al.  Chronopharmacokinetics , 1998, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[7]  W. Dolmans,et al.  Low Plasma Concentrations of Indinavir are Related to Virological Treatment Failure in HIV-1-Infected Patients on Indinavir-Containing Triple Therapy , 1998, Antiviral therapy.

[8]  J. Montaner,et al.  A randomized, double-blind trial comparing combinations of nevirapine, didanosine, and zidovudine for HIV-infected patients: the INCAS Trial. Italy, The Netherlands, Canada and Australia Study. , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  P. Krogstad,et al.  Combination treatment with zidovudine, didanosine, and nevirapine in infants with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Moroni,et al.  High-dose nevirapine in previously untreated human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected persons does not result in sustained suppression of viral replication. , 1997, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  T. Greenough,et al.  High-dose nevirapine: safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral effect in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. , 1995, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  J L Sullivan,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine: initial single-rising-dose study in humans , 1993, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  R S Woodward,et al.  The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  J. Montaner,et al.  Drug Evaluations Anti-infectives: Nevirapine: A review of its development, pharmacological profile and potential for clinical use , 1996 .