The Bulleye: A Systems Approach to Modeling Family Firms

The purpose of this article is to develop a model of family business that accounts for the unique characteristics and diversity of family businesses and addresses the dynamics among family business subsystems. An open-systems approach serves as the conceptual foundation of the model. The distinctive features of the proposed model are the multiple levels of analysis and the dynamics and interdependencies among the subsystems, allowing the integration of mainstream theories. The model can serve to discover and explore a relevant research question in the context of family business, which may help researchers advance theory building on family business. Furthermore, the model may help family business practitioners better understand the particularities of family firms.

[1]  Robert Dahlstrom,et al.  Social networks and the adverse selection problem in agency relationships , 2003 .

[2]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[3]  Frank Hoy,et al.  Emerging Business, Emerging Field: Entrepreneurship and the Family Firm , 1994 .

[4]  Kosmas X. Smyrnios,et al.  Handbook of Research on Family Business , 2008 .

[5]  P. Davis,et al.  Realizing the potential of the family business , 1983 .

[6]  C. Salvato,et al.  Self–Serving or Self–Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence” , 2004 .

[7]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Extending the Theoretical Horizons of Family Business Research , 2003 .

[8]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Group dynamics, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[9]  Ronald C. Anderson,et al.  Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2003 .

[10]  Pramodita Sharma,et al.  An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future , 2004 .

[11]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[12]  Alex Stewart,et al.  Help One Another, Use One Another: Toward an Anthropology of Family Business* , 2003 .

[13]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  An Exploratory Comparison of the Behavioral Dynamics of Top Management Teams in Family and Nonfamily New Ventures: Cohesion, Conflict, Potency, and Consensus , 2005 .

[14]  Greg Mccann.  Where Do We Go from Here? Strategic Answers for University-Based Family Business Programs , 2003 .

[15]  M. Neubert,et al.  Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence , 2004 .

[16]  D. Olson,et al.  Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families , 1989 .

[17]  George P. Huber,et al.  The Systems Paradigm in Organization Theory: Correcting the Record and Suggesting the Future , 1987 .

[18]  R. Ackoff,et al.  Mechanisms, organisms and social systems , 1984 .

[19]  D. Kertzer.  Household History and Sociological Theory , 1991 .

[20]  John L. Ward,et al.  Keeping The Family Business Healthy , 1986 .

[21]  D. Garland.  Book Review: Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families , 1992 .

[22]  Diane A. Riordan,et al.  Field Theory: An Alternative to Systems Theories in Understanding the Small Family Business , 1993 .

[23]  Sabine Klein,et al.  The F–PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for Theory , 2005 .

[24]  Sabine B. Klein,et al.  The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses , 2007 .

[25]  Douglas J. Lincoln,et al.  Systems theory approach to conducting industrial marketing research , 1989 .

[26]  E. Kepner,et al.  The Family and the Firm: A Coevolutionary Perspective , 1991 .

[27]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[28]  S. Zahra,et al.  Family Business Research: A Strategic Reflection , 2004 .

[29]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  The Effects of Parental Altruism on the Governance of Family-Managed Firms , 2005 .

[30]  F. Brown,et al.  Drawbacks of a Dual Systems Approach to Family Firms: Can We Expand Our Thinking? , 1991 .

[31]  Reginald A. Litz,et al.  A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: an extension and integration , 2003 .

[32]  P. Davis,et al.  Adaptation, Survival, and Growth of the Family Business: An Integrated Systems Perspective , 1981 .

[33]  S. Zahra.  Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research , 2007 .

[34]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm , 2005 .

[35]  A. Woodside.  Advancing systems thinking and building microworlds in business and industrial marketing , 2006 .

[36]  Richard Beckhard,et al.  Managing continuity in the family-owned business , 1983 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[38]  T. Habbershon,et al.  Enterprising Families Domain: Family-Influenced Ownership Groups in Pursuit of Transgenerational Wealth , 2002 .

[39]  Mattei Dogan,et al.  The Hybridization of Social Science Knowledge , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[40]  John L. Ward,et al.  The family business : its governance for sustainability , 1998 .

[41]  Reiko Kishida,et al.  Does the Family Business Interaction Factor Represent a Resource or a Cost? , 2004 .

[42]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[43]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Assessment of Technology In Organizations: Closed versus Open Systems Approach , 1979 .

[44]  Friederike Welter,et al.  Exploring the Role of Trust in Entrepreneurial Activity , 2006 .

[45]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[46]  Danny Miller,et al.  Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities , 2006 .

[47]  Teresa J. Rothausen.  ‘Family’ in organizational research: a review and comparison of definitions and measures , 1999 .

[48]  Randel S. Carlock,et al.  Strategic Planning for The Family Business: Parallel Planning to Unify the Family and Business , 2001 .

[49]  S. Danes,et al.  Family FIRO Model: An Application to Family Business , 2002 .

[50]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[51]  Rik Donckels,et al.  Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOS , 1991 .

[52]  M. Wortman.  Theoretical Foundations for Family-Owned Business: A Conceptual and Research-Based Paradigm , 1994 .

[53]  James E. Rosenzweig,et al.  System Concepts: Pervasiveness and Potential , 1992 .

[54]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[55]  I. MacMillan,et al.  A unified systems perspective of family firm performance , 2003 .

[56]  John Leaptrott.  An Institutional Theory View of the Family Business , 2005 .

[57]  Louis B. Barnes,et al.  Transferring Power in the Family Business , 1989 .

[58]  Boris W. Becker,et al.  Values and the Organization: Suggestions for Research , 1975 .

[59]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[60]  P. Wright.  The Social Psychology of Organizations, (2nd Ed): Daniel Katz and Robert L. Kahn New York: Wiley, 1978, 838 pp. , 1979 .

[61]  Ivan Lansberg,et al.  The Succession Conspiracy , 1988 .

[62]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[63]  J. H. Davis,et al.  TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[64]  N. Elman,et al.  Family-Owned Businesses: An Emerging Field of Inquiry , 1988 .

[65]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Family vs. Non–Family Firms: A Resource–Based Analysis of the Effect of Organizational Culture , 2004 .

[66]  J. Astrachan,et al.  The Importance of Integrated Goal Setting: The Application of Cost-of-Capital Concepts to Private Firms , 2004 .

[67]  John A. Davis,et al.  Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business , 1997 .

[68]  J. Astrachan,et al.  Commentary on the Special Issue: The Emergence of a Field , 2003 .

[69]  William S. Schulze,et al.  Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion Among The Directors of Private Family Firms , 2003 .

[70]  J. G. Miller.  Living systems. , 1972, Currents in modern biology.

[71]  J. Ward.  Creating Effective Boards for Private Enterprises: Meeting the Challenges of Continuity and Competition , 1991 .

[72]  Ivan Lansberg.  Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap , 1983 .

[73]  John A. Davis,et al.  Bivalent Attributes of the Family Firm , 1996 .

[74]  T. Habbershon,et al.  A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms , 1999 .

[75]  Martin Larraza-Kintana,et al.  THE DETERMINANTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IN FAMILY-CONTROLLED PUBLIC CORPORATIONS , 2003 .

[76]  Neil C. Churchill,et al.  Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses , 1987 .

[77]  Alan Fowler,et al.  Systems modelling, simulation, and the dynamics of strategy , 2003 .

[78]  Kosmas X. Smyrnios,et al.  The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: A Proposal for Solving the Family Business Definition Problem1 , 2002 .

[79]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .

[80]  K. Stafford,et al.  A Research Model of Sustainable Family Businesses , 1999 .

[81]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations , 2001 .