Entropy and Energy in Characterizing the Organization of Concept Maps in Learning Science

Knowledge structures are often represented in the form of networks or maps of concepts. The coherence and connectivity of such knowledge representations is known to be closely related to knowledge production, acquisition and processing. In this study we use network theory in making the clustering and cohesion of concept maps measurable, and show how the distribution of these properties can be interpreted through the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) method. This approach allows to introduce new concepts of the “energy of cognitive load” and the “entropy of knowledge organization” to describe the organization of knowledge in the concept maps.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  I. Kinchin,et al.  How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development , 2000 .

[3]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Complexity Analysis of Ontology Integration Methodologies: A Comparative Study , 2009, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[4]  A. Cañas,et al.  Concept Maps: Experiments on Dynamic Thinking. , 2007 .

[5]  A. Cañas,et al.  Concept Maps: a Theoretical Note on Concepts and the Need for Cyclic Concept Maps , 2003 .

[6]  Bruce J. West,et al.  Fractal physiology , 1994, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[7]  H. Suen,et al.  Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality , 1999 .

[8]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Topological phase transitions of random networks , 2003, cond-mat/0306170.

[9]  P. Kosso,et al.  Reading the book of nature , 1992 .

[10]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Network Data , 2009 .

[11]  I. Koponen,et al.  Coherent Knowledge Structures of Physics Represented as Concept Networks in Teacher Education , 2010 .

[12]  Werner Horsthemke.  Time's Arrow: The Origins of Thermodynamic Behavior, Michael C. Mackey. Springer, Boca Raton, FL (1992), $49.00 (cloth), 172 pp , 1994 .

[13]  E. Jaynes.  Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[14]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing , 2002 .

[15]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[16]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[17]  Steven M. Goodreau,et al.  Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models applied to a large social network , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[18]  Steven Skiena,et al.  Computational Discrete Mathematics: Combinatorics and Graph Theory with Mathematica ® , 2009 .

[19]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[20]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[21]  Michael C. Mackey,et al.  Time's Arrow: The Origins of Thermodynamic Behavior , 1991 .

[22]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[24]  Stanley A. Mulaik,et al.  Linear Causal Modeling with Structural Equations , 2009 .

[25]  Peng Wang,et al.  Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[26]  Carlos M. Parra,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of knowledge , 2006, Complex..

[27]  Deborah G. Mayo,et al.  Error Statistics and Learning from Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity , 1997, Philosophy of Science.

[28]  R. Giere.  Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach , 1991 .

[29]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[30]  T. Gog,et al.  Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning , 2009 .

[31]  Aris Spanos,et al.  Curve Fitting, the Reliability of Inductive Inference, and the Error‐Statistical Approach , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[32]  Robert M. Leve,et al.  Informational acquisition and cognitive models , 2003, Complex..

[33]  J. A. Rodríguez-Velázquez,et al.  Subgraph centrality in complex networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  R. Baierlein.  Probability Theory: The Logic of Science , 2004 .

[35]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[36]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  K. Lehrer.  Theory Of Knowledge , 1990 .

[38]  F. Suppe.  The Structure of Scientific Theories. , 1975 .

[39]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[40]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[41]  Charles Kemp,et al.  The discovery of structural form , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners , 2002 .

[43]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Bayesian Special Section Learning Overhypotheses with Hierarchical Bayesian Models , 2022 .