Parkinson's prevalence estimated by a state registry

A solid understanding of the descriptive epidemiology of a disease is essential in etiologic investigations; this includes prevalence and incidence, as well as groups within the larger community who may have noticeably lower or higher rates. We ascertained the usefulness of a non‐traditional registry in describing Parkinson's disease (PD) patterns in a community. A passive surveillance PD registry in Nebraska began data collection on 1 January 1997. All physicians were required to report PD diagnosis, pharmacists reported new prescriptions of anti‐PD drugs (PD cases were confirmed later with the prescribing physician), and there was a patient self‐report mechanism. The overlap of reporting by the sources allowed estimation of the number not reported by any source, using the statistical technique “capture–recapture.” As of January 2000, the Nebraska PD Registry had reports of 5,062 PD patients. The number not reported by any Registry reporting source was calculated to be 117, leading to an estimated total of 5,179 cases and a prevalence of 329.3 per 100,000 population. Tabulations of age‐ and gender‐specific prevalence rates, as well as county‐level estimates, allow examination of areas of elevated or lowered prevalence. The combination of a passive surveillance system and capture–recapture technique presents a useful method for epidemiologic description, and more traditional survey methods could benefit by including capture–recapture capability. © 2003 Movement Disorder Society

[1]  L. Svenson,et al.  Geographic Variations in the Prevalence Rates of Parkinson’s Disease in Alberta , 1993, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[2]  J. Meara,et al.  Parkinson's disease epidemiology in the Northampton District, England, 1992 , 1995, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. Pedro-Cuesta Parkinson's disease occurrence in Europe , 1991 .

[4]  G. Seber The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[5]  Dallas W. Anderson,et al.  Prevalence surveys of neurologic disorders: methodologic implications of the Copiah County Study. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  R E LaPorte,et al.  Ascertainment corrected rates: applications of capture-recapture methods. , 1993, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  W. Rocca,et al.  Problems and Issues with Door-To-Door, Two-Phase Surveys: An Illustration from Central Spain , 2001, Neuroepidemiology.

[8]  M. Weatherall,et al.  Is the prevalence of Parkinson's disease in New Zealand really changing? , 1992, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[9]  T. Riise,et al.  The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease in the county of Rogaland, Norway , 1995, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[10]  K. Marder,et al.  A population-based investigation of Parkinson's disease with and without dementia. Relationship to age and gender. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[11]  W. Rocca,et al.  Prevalence of Parkinson's disease and other types of parkinsonism , 1992, Neurology.

[12]  A. Maguire,et al.  Use of capture-recapture to estimate the prevalence of opiate addiction in Barcelona, Spain, 1989. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  R. Cormack Log-linear models for capture-recapture , 1989 .

[14]  B. Jeune,et al.  High prevalence of Parkinson's disease in the Faroe Islands , 1997, Neurology.

[15]  E. Hook,et al.  Use of capture-recapture analyses in fetal alcohol syndrome surveillance in Alaska. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  C. Hertzman,et al.  A community survey of Parkinson's disease. , 1989, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[17]  Dallas W. Anderson,et al.  Prevalence of Parkinson's disease in the biracial population of Copiah County, Mississippi , 1985, Neurology.