Residual force enhancement in myofibrils and sarcomeres

Residual force enhancement has been observed following active stretch of skeletal muscles and single fibres. However, there has been intense debate whether force enhancement is a sarcomeric property, or is associated with sarcomere length instability and the associated development of non-uniformities. Here, we studied force enhancement for the first time in isolated myofibrils (n=18) that, owing to the strict in series arrangement, allowed for evaluation of this property in individual sarcomeres (n=79). We found consistent force enhancement following stretch in all myofibrils and each sarcomere, and forces in the enhanced state typically exceeded the isometric forces on the plateau of the force–length relationship. Measurements were made on the plateau and the descending limb of the force–length relationship and revealed gross sarcomere length non-uniformities prior to and following active myofibril stretching, but in contrast to previous accounts, revealed that sarcomere lengths were perfectly stable under these experimental conditions. We conclude that force enhancement is a sarcomeric property that does not depend on sarcomere length instability, that force enhancement varies greatly for different sarcomeres within the same myofibril and that sarcomeres with vastly different amounts of actin–myosin overlap produce the same isometric steady-state forces. This last finding was not explained by differences in the amount of contractile proteins within sarcomeres, vastly different passive properties of individual sarcomeres or (half-) sarcomere length instabilities, suggesting that the basic mechanical properties of muscles, such as force enhancement, force depression and creep, which have traditionally been associated with sarcomere instabilities and the corresponding dynamic redistribution of sarcomere lengths, are not caused by such instabilities, but rather seem to be inherent properties of the mechanisms of contraction.

[1]  D. Morgan New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[2]  W Herzog,et al.  Residual force enhancement in skeletal muscle , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[4]  M. Bartoo,et al.  Active tension generation in isolated skeletal myofibrils , 1993, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[5]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Stretch-induced, steady-state force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibers exceeds the isometric force at optimum fiber length. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  A. Huxley,et al.  Proposed Mechanism of Force Generation in Striated Muscle , 1971, Nature.

[7]  Yiming Wu,et al.  Calcium-dependent molecular spring elements in the giant protein titin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  B. C. Abbott,et al.  ABSTRACTS OF MEMOIRS RECORDING WORK DONE AT THE PLYMOUTH LABORATORY THE FORCE EXERTED BY ACTIVE STRIATED MUSCLE DURING AND AFTER CHANGE OF LENGTH , 2022 .

[9]  A. Hill The mechanics of active muscle , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[10]  W. Herzog,et al.  Reply from Walter Herzog (on behalf of the authors) and Tim Leonard , 2007 .

[11]  M. Noble,et al.  Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  W. Herzog,et al.  New insights into the passive force enhancement in skeletal muscles. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  E. Homsher,et al.  Regulation of the cross-bridge transition from a weakly to strongly bound state in skinned rabbit muscle fibers. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Huxley,et al.  Structural Changes in Muscle During Contraction: Interference Microscopy of Living Muscle Fibres , 1954, Nature.

[15]  P. Geiger,et al.  Non-cross-bridge calcium-dependent stiffness in frog muscle fibers. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[16]  U. Proske,et al.  Can all residual force enhancement be explained by sarcomere non‐uniformities? , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  H. Huxley,et al.  FILAMENT LENGTHS IN STRIATED MUSCLE , 1963, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  K W Ranatunga,et al.  Crossbridge and non‐crossbridge contributions to tension in lengthening rat muscle: force‐induced reversal of the power stroke , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  M. Noble,et al.  Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers , 1982, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  H. Granzier,et al.  Cardiac titin isoforms are coexpressed in the half-sarcomere and extend independently. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[21]  W. Herzog,et al.  The role of passive structures in force enhancement of skeletal muscles following active stretch. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  W Herzog,et al.  Myofilament lengths of cat skeletal muscle: theoretical considerations and functional implications. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  D. Jones,et al.  The force‐velocity relationship of human adductor pollicis muscle during stretch and the effects of fatigue , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  The structural basis of the increase in isometric force production with temperature in frog skeletal muscle , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Dynamics of individual sarcomeres during and after stretch in activated single myofibrils , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  H. Huxley,et al.  Changes in the Cross-Striations of Muscle during Contraction and Stretch and their Structural Interpretation , 1954, Nature.

[27]  W. Herzog,et al.  Passive force enhancement in single myofibrils , 2007, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

[28]  D L Morgan An explanation for residual increased tension in striated muscle after stretch during contraction , 1994, Experimental physiology.

[29]  M. Bartoo,et al.  Basis of passive tension and stiffness in isolated rabbit myofibrils. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[30]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Effect of 2,3-butanedione monoxime on myosin and myofibrillar ATPases. An example of an uncompetitive inhibitor. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[31]  W. Herzog,et al.  HISTORY DEPENDENCE OF SKELETAL MUSCLE FORCE PRODUCTION: A FORGOTTEN PROPERTY , 2002 .

[32]  A. Huxley,et al.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  T. Tsuchiya,et al.  Stiffness changes during enhancement and deficit of isometric force by slow length changes in frog skeletal muscle fibres. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  K. Ranatunga,et al.  Temperature‐dependent transitions in isometric contractions of rat muscle. , 1983, Journal of Physiology.

[35]  W. Herzog,et al.  Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle: a new mechanism. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  V Lombardi,et al.  Effect of temperature on the working stroke of muscle myosin. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  B. Colombini,et al.  A non-cross-bridge stiffness in activated frog muscle fibers. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Walter Herzog,et al.  History-dependence of isometric muscle force: effect of prior stretch or shortening amplitude. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  J. Telleria [Mechanism of muscular contraction]. , 1951, Medicina.

[40]  U Proske,et al.  Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Force enhancement following muscle stretch of electrically stimulated and voluntarily activated human adductor pollicis , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  K W Ranatunga,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of half‐sarcomeres during and after stretch in activated rabbit psoas myofibrils: sarcomere asymmetry but no ‘sarcomere popping’ , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  Wolfgang A. Linke,et al.  Gigantic variety: expression patterns of titin isoforms in striated muscles and consequences for myofibrillar passive stiffness , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[44]  R A Milligan,et al.  Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. , 1993, Science.