Seeking Guidelines through an Evolutionary Approach: Style Revisited among the ! Kung San (Ju/'hoansi) of the 1990s

This paper will seek to situate style as a means of communication in a fundamental human cognitive process identified in social psychology: the establishment of positive personal and social identities via social comparison and the projection of these to others. First, identification by comparison and its link to stylistic communication will be discussed. Second, how this cognitive process came to be in our evolutionary history, and the evolutionary developments through which style might have arisen will be identified. Third, the implications of this process for formulating stylistic questions and guiding analysis will be developed. The focus will be on diachronic rather than synchronic stylistic analysis, namely, on analysis of the changing relations between the individual and society and how history is drawn on selectively in creating or transforming identities. Finally, the utility of the approach will be tested in a follow-up case study of stylistic change in projectile points and beadwork among the !Kung San (Ju/'hoansi) of Botswana and Namibia.

[1]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[2]  P. Wiessner.  Reconsidering the Behavioral Basis for Style: A Case Study among the Kalahari San , 1984 .

[3]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  The Need to be Informed , 1981 .

[4]  J. Marshall.  The Need to Be Informed: A Reply to the Collective Letter , 1996 .

[5]  Gérard Lemaine.  Social differentiation and social originality , 1974 .

[6]  P. Wiessner.  Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points , 1983, American Antiquity.

[7]  Keith F. Otterbein,et al.  Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution [and Comments and Replies] , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[8]  G. Clark,et al.  Art as information: Explaining Upper Palaeolithic art in western Europe , 1994 .

[9]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[10]  Christopher Carr,et al.  A Unified Middle-Range Theory of Artifact Design , 1995 .

[11]  H. Fromkin.  Feelings of interpersonal undistinctiveness: An unpleasant affective state. , 1972 .

[12]  P. Wiessner.  Measuring the impact of social ties on nutritional status among the !kung San , 1981 .

[13]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup behaviour , 1974 .

[14]  James M. Skibo,et al.  The Explanation of Artifact Variability , 1997, American Antiquity.

[15]  P. Wiessner,et al.  Hxaro: a regional system of reciprocity for reducing risk among the !Kung San , 1977 .

[16]  John Tooby,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I: Theoretical considerations , 1989 .

[17]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Egalitarian Behavior and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy [and Comments and Reply] , 1993, Current Anthropology.

[18]  Clive Gamble,et al.  Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society , 1982 .

[19]  J. Sackett.  Approaches to style in lithic archaeology , 1982 .

[20]  F. Neiman.  Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages , 1995, American Antiquity.