Tests for sex‐biased dispersal using bi‐parentally inherited genetic markers

Understanding why dispersal is sex‐biased in many taxa is still a major concern in evolutionary ecology. Dispersal tends to be male‐biased in mammals and female‐biased in birds, but counter‐examples exist and little is known about sex bias in other taxa. Obtaining accurate measures of dispersal in the field remains a problem. Here we describe and compare several methods for detecting sex‐biased dispersal using bi‐parentally inherited, codominant genetic markers. If gene flow is restricted among populations, then the genotype of an individual tells something about its origin. Provided that dispersal occurs at the juvenile stage and that sampling is carried out on adults, genotypes sampled from the dispersing sex should on average be less likely (compared to genotypes from the philopatric sex) in the population in which they were sampled. The dispersing sex should be less genetically structured and should present a larger heterozygote deficit. In this study we use computer simulations and a permutation test on four statistics to investigate the conditions under which sex‐biased dispersal can be detected. Two tests emerge as fairly powerful. We present results concerning the optimal sampling strategy (varying number of samples, individuals, loci per individual and level of polymorphism) under different amounts of dispersal for each sex. These tests for biases in dispersal are also appropriate for any attribute (e.g. size, colour, status) suspected to influence the probability of dispersal. A windows program carrying out these tests can be freely downloaded from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html

[1]  C. Johnson,et al.  Sex-biased philopatry and dispersal in mammals , 1986, Oecologia.

[2]  M. Clout,et al.  Sex‐biased dispersal and a density‐independent mating system in the Australian brushtail possum, as revealed by minisatellite DNA profiling , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[3]  F. Balloux.  EASYPOP (version 1.7): a computer program for population genetics simulations. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[4]  M. Gardner,et al.  The impact of habitat fragmentation on dispersal of Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami): evidence from allelic and genotypic analyses of microsatellites , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[5]  F. Balloux,et al.  SEX-BIASED DISPERSAL IN A MIGRATORY BAT: A CHARACTERIZATION USING SEX-SPECIFIC DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS , 2001 .

[6]  F. Balloux,et al.  SEX‐BIASED DISPERSAL IN A MIGRATORY BAT: A CHARACTERIZATION USING SEX‐SPECIFIC DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  M. Hurles,et al.  Patterns of inter- and intra-group genetic diversity in the Vlax Roma as revealed by Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA lineages , 2001, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[8]  J. Goudet,et al.  Inbreeding, kinship, and the evolution of natal dispersal , 2001 .

[9]  K. Hobson,et al.  Limited differentiation in microsatellite DNA variation among northern populations of the yellow warbler: evidence for male‐biased gene flow? , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[10]  F. Balloux,et al.  MICROSATELLITES CAN BE MISLEADING: AN EMPIRICAL AND SIMULATION STUDY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[12]  N. Perrin,et al.  Local Competition, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex‐Biased Dispersal , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[13]  G Luikart,et al.  New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. , 1999, Genetics.

[14]  G. Turner,et al.  Evidence for male‐biased dispersal in Lake Malawi cichlids from microsatellites , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[15]  N. Perrin,et al.  Dispersal and Inbreeding Avoidance , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[16]  P. Waser,et al.  Genetic detection of sex‐biased dispersal , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[17]  J. Long,et al.  Autosomal, mitochondrial, and Y chromosome DNA variation in Finland: evidence for a male-specific bottleneck. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  G. Hewitt,et al.  Fine‐scale genetic structuring in a natural population of European wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[19]  J. Plissner,et al.  Sex Biases in Avian Natal Dispersal: An Extension of the Mammalian Model , 1998 .

[20]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Gene flow between insular, coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[21]  F. Balloux,et al.  BREEDING SYSTEM AND GENETIC VARIANCE IN THE MONOGAMOUS, SEMI‐SOCIAL SHREW, CROCIDURA RUSSULA , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Dispersal, philopatry, and genetic relatedness in a social carnivore: comparing males and females , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[23]  F. Barroux.  Breeding system and genetic variance in the monogamous, semi-social shrew , 1998 .

[24]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1997 .

[25]  B. Sæther,et al.  Sex Biases in Avian Dispersal: A Reappraisal , 1997 .

[26]  B. Rannala,et al.  Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Tautz,et al.  The microevolution of the Galápagos marine iguana Amblyrhynchus cristatus assessed by nuclear and mitochondrial genetic analyses , 1997 .

[28]  F. Balloux,et al.  Female-biased dispersal in the monogamous mammal Crocidura russula: evidence from field data and microsatellite patterns. , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  T. Saitoh,et al.  Sex‐related spatial kin structure in a spring population of grey‐sided voles Clethrionomys rufocanus as revealed by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA analyses , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[30]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Launching microsatelites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference , 1997 .

[31]  R. Denno,et al.  Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[32]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  M Raymond,et al.  Testing differentiation in diploid populations. , 1996, Genetics.

[34]  P. Jarne,et al.  Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  L. Keller,et al.  Joint Influence of Gene Flow and Selection on a Reproductively Important Genetic Polymorphism in the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Geoffrey R. Geupel,et al.  Correcting Biased Estimates of Dispersal and Survival Due to Limited Study Area: Theory and an Application Using Wrentits , 1995 .

[37]  I. Stirling,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[38]  T. Pärt.  The importance of local familiarity and search costs for age- and sex-biased philopatry in the collared flycatcher , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  J. O. Wolff.  More on Juvenile Dispersal in Mammals , 1994 .

[40]  G. Burghardt,et al.  Sex-biased dispersal in a polygynous lizard, Uta stansburiana , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[42]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals , 1989, Nature.

[44]  A. Pusey.  Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[46]  G. McCracken,et al.  ON ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  M. Kawata.  Sex differences in the spatial distribution of genotypes in the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae , 1985 .

[48]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients. , 1984, Genetics.

[50]  F. Dobson,et al.  Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[52]  P. Greenwood.  Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals , 1980, Animal Behaviour.