Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience
暂无分享,去创建一个
Elisabeth M. Bik | Arturo Casadevall | Roger J. Davis | Ferric C. Fang | Amy L. Kullas | A. Casadevall | E. Bik | F. Fang | Amy L. Kullas | R. Davis
[1] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications , 2018, Science and Engineering Ethics.
[2] J. Beall,et al. RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record , 2018, Research Integrity and Peer Review.
[3] D. Butler. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers , 2018, Nature.
[4] D. Moher,et al. A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals , 2017, BMJ Open.
[5] Amy L. Kullas,et al. Setting the (Scientific) Record Straight: Molecular and Cellular Biology Responds to Postpublication Review , 2017, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[6] R. Gemayel,et al. Avoiding common pitfalls of manuscript and figure preparation , 2017, The FEBS journal.
[7] A. Casadevall,et al. Why do scientists fabricate and falsify data? A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications , 2017, bioRxiv.
[8] D. Taylor. Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[9] D. Taylor. JOURNAL CLUB: Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[10] J. Lykkesfeldt. Strategies for Using Plagiarism Software in the Screening of Incoming Journal Manuscripts: Recommendations Based on a Recent Literature Survey , 2016, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.
[11] A. Casadevall,et al. ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites , 2016, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
[12] A. Casadevall,et al. ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites , 2016, mBio.
[13] Elisabeth M. Bik,et al. The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications , 2016, mBio.
[14] L. Looi,et al. Response: Scientific misconduct encountered by APAME journals: insight? , 2016, The Malaysian journal of pathology.
[15] L. Looi,et al. Scientific misconduct encountered by APAME journals: an online survey. , 2015, The Malaysian journal of pathology.
[16] Paul Knoepfler,et al. Reviewing post-publication peer review. , 2015, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[17] Kenneth M. Yamada,et al. Reproducibility and cell biology , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.
[18] A. Casadevall,et al. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[19] O. Babalola,et al. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication. , 2012, Clinics in dermatology.
[20] A. Casadevall,et al. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index , 2011, Infection and Immunity.
[21] L. Bonetta. The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud , 2006, Cell.
[22] Mike Rossner. Figure manipulation , 2002, The Journal of Cell Biology.
[23] D. Kronick. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. , 1990, JAMA.