An Accurate Estimation of T2* Mapping for Fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose Quantitative T2* mapping is promising due to its clinical applicability and has been employed for the assessment of cartilage repair procedures of the knee. Generally, the under-sampling k-space technique was applied to accelerate T2* mapping which is considerable time-consuming with traditional sequences. However, the under-sampling k-space technique may be impractical for acquiring reliable sampling of the T2* decay. In order to improve the corresponding accuracy of T2* mapping with under-sampled k-space technique, a new method has been proposed of deep learning (DL) based under-sampling MR images reconstruction. Methods In this work, we employed a residual network with 3 layers to explore latent functions between fully-sampled and under-sampled MR images and then applied these functions to regularize the MR images reconstruction from under-sampling k-space data. The proposed method includes three steps. Firstly, the regridding reconstruction and ESPIRiT reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct MR images from fully sampling and under-sampling k-space data, respectively. Then, 12 MR images at different echo time (TE=0.2/0.5/0.8/2/3.3/5.5/8/11/15/20/25/30ms) derived from under-sampling k-space data were fed into the proposed network. Ultimately, the optimized MR images were utilized to calculate T2* values. Results The T2* values derived from the proposed method were more accurate than that from the regridding reconstruction or ESPIRiT reconstruction in four tissues. For instance, when the acceleration ratio (ACC) was set at 4, the T2* values (mean ± standard deviation) of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) were 7.97±0.40ms in regridding constructed reference image, the T2* values derived from the regridding reconstruction of 7.34±1.04ms fluctuated wildly, while the T2* values from the proposed method were restored to 7.84±1.39ms which were closer to the reference T2* values. Additionally, the T2* values of PCL were 6.99±9.47ms in ESPIRiT reconstructed reference image, the T2* values derived from the ESPIRiT reconstruction of 5.32±8.44ms fluctuated wildly, while the T2* values from the proposed method were restored to 6.64±11.73ms.The similar phenomenon can be seen in other three ROIs with ACC = 4 or 2. Conclusion T2* mapping optimized by the proposed DL-based method resembles the reference qualitatively and quantitatively. In conclusion, the proposed method has great promise on improving the accuracy of T2* mapping based on under-sampling k-space technique for fast magnetic resonance imaging.

[1]  Yongxian Qian,et al.  Assessing degeneration of human articular cartilage with ultra-short echo time (UTE) T2* mapping. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  Sean C L Deoni,et al.  Quantitative Relaxometry of the Brain , 2010, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[3]  T. Mosher,et al.  Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Model-based MR parameter mapping with sparsity constraint , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[5]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Model‐based nonlinear inverse reconstruction for T2 mapping using highly undersampled spin‐echo MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  A. Majumdar,et al.  An algorithm for sparse MRI reconstruction by Schatten p-norm minimization. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Klaus A Siebenrock,et al.  Feasibility of T  2* mapping for the evaluation of hip joint cartilage at 1.5T using a three‐dimensional (3D), gradient‐echo (GRE) sequence: A prospective study , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  G. Bydder,et al.  Ultrashort echo time spectroscopic imaging (UTESI): an efficient method for quantifying bound and free water , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[10]  Razvan Pascanu,et al.  Learned-Norm Pooling for Deep Feedforward and Recurrent Neural Networks , 2013, ECML/PKDD.

[11]  Yaoqin Xie,et al.  A Sparse-View CT Reconstruction Method Based on Combination of DenseNet and Deconvolution , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  R Krauspe,et al.  T2* mapping of hip joint cartilage in various histological grades of degeneration. , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Repair of the Knee ? : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reliable in Predicting Clinical Outcome After Articular Cartilage , 2013 .

[14]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Standardized T2* map of normal human heart in vivo to correct T2* segmental artefacts , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  Simon J. Doran,et al.  Stacked Autoencoders for Unsupervised Feature Learning and Multiple Organ Detection in a Pilot Study Using 4D Patient Data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  J. Sijbers,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of signal amplitude and noise variance from MR data , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  H. Potter,et al.  Morphologic and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage for the assessment of post‐traumatic osteoarthritis , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Low-Rank Modeling of Local $k$-Space Neighborhoods (LORAKS) for Constrained MRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  G. Antoch,et al.  T2* mapping and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cartilage (dGEMRIC) of humeral articular cartilage--a histologically controlled study. , 2015, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[21]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[22]  J. D. O'Sullivan,et al.  A Fast Sinc Function Gridding Algorithm for Fourier Inversion in Computer Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  O. Bieri,et al.  Bi-exponential T2* analysis of healthy and diseased Achilles tendons: an in vivo preliminary magnetic resonance study and correlation with clinical score , 2013, European Radiology.

[24]  Yajun Ma,et al.  Measurement of bound and pore water T1 relaxation times in cortical bone using three‐dimensional ultrashort echo time cones sequences , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Enhong Chen,et al.  Image Denoising and Inpainting with Deep Neural Networks , 2012, NIPS.

[26]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Radial Fast Spin-Echo MRI , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Yajun Ma,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones (3D UTE-Cones) magnetic resonance imaging of entheses and tendons. , 2018, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  Koichi Masuda,et al.  Ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with bi-component analysis: bound and free water evaluation of bovine cortical bone subject to sequential drying. , 2012, Bone.

[29]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  P M Jakob,et al.  VD‐AUTO‐SMASH imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  K. Siebenrock,et al.  Evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using T2* mapping at different time points at 3.0 Tesla MRI: a feasibility study , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[34]  S. Trattnig,et al.  Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[35]  Won C Bae,et al.  Single‐ and Bi‐component T2* analysis of tendon before and during tensile loading, using UTE sequences , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Rüdiger Krauspe,et al.  T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment: principles, current applications, and future prospects , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[37]  E. Chang,et al.  Dual inversion recovery ultrashort echo time (DIR-UTE) imaging and quantification of the zone of calcified cartilage (ZCC). , 2013, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[38]  Mathews Jacob,et al.  Accelerated Dynamic MRI Exploiting Sparsity and Low-Rank Structure: k-t SLR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[40]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[41]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.

[42]  M. Lustig,et al.  Compressed Sensing MRI , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[43]  Ce Liu,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Image Deconvolution , 2014, NIPS.

[44]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: How to Choose the Optimal Method , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[45]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  The appeal of parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[46]  Michael Elad,et al.  ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets GRAPPA , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[48]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) for Nuclei Detection on Breast Cancer Histopathology Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  Qing Lyu,et al.  Quantitative MRI: Absolute T1, T2 and Proton Density Parameters from Deep Learning , 2018 .

[50]  D. Pennell,et al.  304 An non subjective method for myocardial T2* curve fitting in thalassemia , 2008 .

[51]  Y. Qian,et al.  Multicomponent T2* mapping of knee cartilage: Technical feasibility ex vivo , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[52]  G. Antoch,et al.  Zonal T2* and T1Gd assessment of knee joint cartilage in various histological grades of cartilage degeneration: an observational in vitro study , 2015, BMJ Open.

[53]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  T2 star relaxation times for assessment of articular cartilage at 3 T: a feasibility study , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[54]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Natural Image Denoising with Convolutional Networks , 2008, NIPS.