Final Results of a Prospective Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Interim Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07).

PURPOSE Our main objective was to prospectively determine the prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after two cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone given every 14 days (R-CHOP-14) under standardized treatment and PET evaluation criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with any stage of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were treated with six cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by two cycles of rituximab. PET/CT examinations were performed at baseline, after two cycles (and after four cycles if the patient was PET-positive after two cycles), and at the end of treatment. PET/CT examinations were evaluated locally and by central review. The primary end point was event-free survival at 2 years (2-year EFS). RESULTS Median age of the 138 evaluable patients was 58.5 years with a WHO performance status of 0, 1, or 2 in 56%, 36%, or 8% of the patients, respectively. By local assessment, 83 PET/CT scans (60%) were reported as positive and 55 (40%) as negative after two cycles of R-CHOP-14. Two-year EFS was significantly shorter for PET-positive compared with PET-negative patients (48% v 74%; P = .004). Overall survival at 2 years was not significantly different, with 88% for PET-positive versus 91% for PET-negative patients (P = .46). By using central review and the Deauville criteria, 2-year EFS was 41% versus 76% (P < .001) for patients who had interim PET/CT scans after two cycles of R-CHOP-14 and 24% versus 72% (P < .001) for patients who had PET/CT scans at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION Our results confirmed that an interim PET/CT scan has limited prognostic value in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma homogeneously treated with six cycles of R-CHOP-14 in a large prospective trial. At this point, interim PET/CT scanning is not ready for clinical use to guide treatment decisions in individual patients.

[1]  Bruce D Cheson,et al.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  H. Tilly,et al.  An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  Comparison of various criteria in interpreting end of therapy F-18 labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma , 2013, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[4]  S. Ferrero,et al.  Interim 18-FDG-PET/CT failed to predict the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated at the diagnosis with rituximab-CHOP. , 2012, Blood.

[5]  C. Copie-Bergman,et al.  Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  B. Coiffier,et al.  SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Blood.

[7]  Bruce D Cheson,et al.  Role of functional imaging in the management of lymphoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  C. Bodet-Milin,et al.  Prognostic value of interim FDG PET/CT in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients treated with interim response-adapted strategy: comparison of International Harmonization Project (IHP), Gallamini and London criteria , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Kai Fu,et al.  Immunohistochemical methods for predicting cell of origin and survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Haioun,et al.  Report on the Second International Workshop on interim positron emission tomography in lymphoma held in Menton, France, 8–9 April 2010 , 2010, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[11]  N. Schmitz,et al.  Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  Risk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in Advanced-stage diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  R. Advani,et al.  Interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study. , 2010, Blood.

[14]  C. Haioun,et al.  Interim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: qualitative or quantitative interpretation – where do we stand? , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[15]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for interim response assessment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  S. Goodman,et al.  Phase II study of risk-adapted therapy of newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on midtreatment FDG-PET scanning. , 2009, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[18]  I. Lossos,et al.  High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  L. Staudt,et al.  Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Markus Loeffler,et al.  Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[21]  John P Klein,et al.  Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.

[25]  謙 大間知 CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.Coiffier B,et al.N Engl J Med 2002;346(4):235-42--CHOP+リツキシマブ併用療法は、CHOP療法を上回る治療法であり、DLBCLの治療動向に大きなimpactを与えた , 2004 .

[26]  B. E. C. Oiffier,et al.  CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab Compared with CHOP Alone in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma , 2002 .

[27]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Emili Montserrat,et al.  A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.