The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals

Digital preservation of scientific papers enables their wider accessibility, but also provides a valuable source of information that can be used in a longitudinal scientometric study. The Electronic Library of the Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (eLib) digitizes the most prominent mathematical journals printed in Serbia. In this paper, we study a co-authorship network which represents collaborations among authors who published their papers in the eLib journals in an 80 year period (from 1932 to 2011). Such study enables us to identify patterns and long-term trends in scientific collaborations that are characteristic for a community which mainly consists of Serbian (Yugoslav) mathematicians. Analysis of connected components of the network reveals a topological diversity in the network structure: the network contains a large number of components whose sizes obey a power-law, the majority of components are isolated authors or small trivial components, but there is also a small number of relatively large, non-trivial components of connected authors. Our evolutionary analysis shows that the evolution of the network can be divided into six periods that are characterized by different intensity and type of collaborative behavior among eLib authors. Analysis of author metrics shows that betweenness centrality is a better indicator of author productivity and long-term presence in the eLib journals than degree centrality. Moreover, the strength of correlation between productivity metrics and betweenness centrality increases as the network evolves suggesting that even more stronger correlation can be expected in the future.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[2]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[5]  Reinhard C. Laubenbacher,et al.  Evolutionary events in a mathematical sciences research collaboration network , 2012, Scientometrics.

[6]  Zoran Ognjanovic,et al.  Digitization of Mathematical Editions in Serbia , 2010, Math. Comput. Sci..

[7]  Johan Bollen,et al.  An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers , 2006, CIKM '08.

[8]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Mining a digital library for influential authors , 2007, JCDL '07.

[9]  Jörg Sander,et al.  Analysis of SIGMOD's co-authorship graph , 2003, SGMD.

[10]  T. S. Evans,et al.  Complex networks , 2004 .

[11]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of Information Retrieval , 1998 .

[13]  Miranda Lee Pao.  An empirical examination of Lotka's Law , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Dragan Ivanovic,et al.  Journal evaluation based on bibliometric indicators and the CERIF data model , 2012, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing , 1963 .

[16]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Some analyses of Erdős collaboration graph , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[17]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[18]  Jasna Dravec Braun.  Effects of war on scientific production: mathematics in Croatia from 1968 to 2008 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[19]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  A portion of the well-known collaboration graph , 1995 .

[20]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[21]  Yordan Kalmukov.  Describing papers and reviewers' competences by taxonomy of keywords , 2012, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[23]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[24]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[25]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Ranking authors in digital libraries , 2011, JCDL '11.

[26]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Luís M. A. Bettencourt,et al.  Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[28]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph , 2002 .

[30]  M. Newman.  1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[31]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[34]  Henry Voos.  Lotka and information science , 1974, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  Authorship patterns in information systems , 1997, Scientometrics.

[36]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Paul J. Campbell,et al.  Patterns of Collaboration in Mathematical Research (Book) , 2003 .

[39]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Growth and structure of Slovenia's scientific collaboration network , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[40]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Accessibility of Cities in the Digital Economy , 2004, cond-mat/0412004.

[41]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .